Outsourcing

dilloduck said:
Thanks---and heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeee'sss

RWA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

karnak2.jpg


The Answers are

1. An ape

2. A retard

3. And an arthritic Nun.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Again. Calling me names is not addressing my arguments. SHow me where I've been SUCCESSFULLY refuted.

Go back through this thread for that answer.

Your OPINIONS are not fact, that is the whole point of the argument.

Also, again, your whole m.o. is the ad hominem attack, would you like me to post about 500 posts of yours that irrefuteably prove this?
 
Oh wait....I just need to show 1 deleted post in the Mass. Gay thread that shows you exactly as a frothing at the mouth lib wingnut, that will also be irrefuteable.
 
OCA said:
Go back through this thread for that answer.

Your OPINIONS are not fact, that is the whole point of the argument.

Also, again, your whole m.o. is the ad hominem attack, would you like me to post about 500 posts of yours that irrefuteably prove this?

No. You just keep making the assertion that businesses are inherently moral, which is assinine, considering the actual history of the labor movement, which achieved the good worker conditions we have now, which you spuriously claim are naturally occuring.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
No. You just keep making the assertion that businesses are inherently moral, which is assinine, considering the actual history of the labor movement, which achieved the good worker conditions we have now, which you spuriously claim are naturally occuring.

Since you claim that all labor laws are still needed because businesses are inherently evil then you must believe now that we still need affirmative action because busineses thar are evil are run by individuals and that would make individuals inherently evil and you believe that we need government intervention to ward off the evil.

Its ok, you can now come out for A.A.
 
OCA said:
Since you claim that all labor laws are still needed because businesses are inherently evil then you must believe now that we still need affirmative action because busineses thar are evil are run by individuals and that would make individuals inherently evil and you believe that we need government intervention to ward off the evil.

Its ok, you can now come out for A.A.

Peyote for breakfast?
 
OCA said:
Guess I cornered you.......and your pattern continues. Thanks for proving me right.


But I'm against affirmative action. And I don't believe business is inherently evil. It's like anything else, it depends on the moral parameters we put on it, as a society.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
But I'm against affirmative action. And I don't believe business is inherently evil. It's like anything else, it depends on the moral parameters we put on it, as a society.

Then they are inherently moral, its one way or another.
 
OCA said:
Then they are inherently moral, its one way or another.

No. business is amoral. meaning business in the abstract is neither good or bad. It's morality is determined the parameters we put on it, as a society.

It's like fire, it can be used to heat a house or burn it down.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
This thread in particular is about international trade and our dependance on slave labor, jeff. WHat is your position on that?

It's hilarious to see you try to keep a thread on track. But OK, I'll play your little game.

My position on international trade is that we should trade freely with as many nations as possible, without protectionist tariffs or embargos except in extreme cases.

My position on slave labor is that we got rid of it in 1865, and we should keep it that way.
 
5stringJeff said:
It's hilarious to see you try to keep a thread on track. But OK, I'll play your little game.

My position on international trade is that we should trade freely with as many nations as possible, without protectionist tariffs or embargos except in extreme cases.

My position on slave labor is that we got rid of it in 1865, and we should keep it that way.

How about trading with countries that use slave labor?
 
rtwngAvngr said:
No. I'm not a hypocrite, I've CHANGED. Do you understand the difference?
I believe we should study WHY company's outsource instead of just blindly passing laws against outsourcing. Cheap slave labor overseas is one cause of outsourcing.


Please don't go all "monkey-rage" on me, kay, bro?

Lazy American laborers is another.

Using words such as slave and fascist reveals your weak argument on economics. Fascists nationalize everything and slaves don't earn wages.
See how conservatives view trump supporters? Jobs went overseas because you guys are lazy.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
This thread in particular is about international trade and our dependance on slave labor, jeff. WHat is your position on that?

It's hilarious to see you try to keep a thread on track. But OK, I'll play your little game.

My position on international trade is that we should trade freely with as many nations as possible, without protectionist tariffs or embargos except in extreme cases.

My position on slave labor is that we got rid of it in 1865, and we should keep it that way.
Is this guy a conservative? Doesn't sound at all like trump.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
There was a time with this was the reality of work in america. Worker organization stopped it. And I say it was a good thing. And we shouldn't backslide to this state of things, which is fully possible if laws were changed. I believe the "prosperity" component of the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership (http://www.spp.gov) will attempt to do just this, rolling back our worker protections, justifying it in the name of "prosperity". What say you?

More inane laughter?

I say you are off your rocker, it will not happen. Too bad you don't have faith in capitalism. Go back to studying Che Guevara and Jimmy Hoffa, fucking Democrat socialist,

Why do you hate America so much?
Yet today Republican nominee says he wants to tariff? I don't believe him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top