Outsourcing

[rtwngAvngr]

RWA, your continual misguided use of the word fascist is growing tiresome, please lift up the content of your posts in order to make the board a better place.

I have not advocated complete deregulation, I have advocated that further government interference in private business be kept to a bare minimum such as is the case with Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart should be left to run their business as they see fit, if they were running a "slave" factory as some claim then they would find it hard to find employees but that currently isn't the case, a new Wal-Mart store usually has on average of 3,000 applicants for work.

I also advocate a revisiting of labor laws to see if some deregulation would be wise which I believe it could be.

TODAY'S busineses are caring and can be trusted to police theirselves, its sad that you have no faith in Americans.

For someone who doesn't work......wait, I was gonna say you know alot.......but you don't, we will just chalk it up to job place inexperience..

You've said businesses should be allowed to police themselves. That's hilarious.

I'm not advocating MORE regulation. I'm saying let's not rollback what we have, which you think MIGHT be wise.

Walmart doesn't run the slave shops, china does. The liberals are misguided in attacking walmart; they should focus their energy on embargoing nations which use slave labor and are totalitarians.

You personal insults only highlight your own lowly nature and desperation.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

TODAY'S busineses are caring and can be trusted to police theirselves,

:rotflmao:

its sad that you have no faith in Americans.

You're the one saying we don't deserve border enforcement because we're too lazy.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Maybe the mods don't feel the need to stop personal attacks against someone who 85% of the time subsists purely on them. Just a hunch. Either that or the jews are paying them off.

Oh please. My posts are mostly chock full of meaningful content, with amusing little jabs as a spicy bit of entertainment. You're completely misrepresenting the situation. Mostly is the mods are having their previous worldviews shattered, their neocon glasses ripped from their pointed heads brusquely, and like true little beaten authoritarian followers, they circle the wagons to repel the threatening reality with which they cannot cope. This is the real truth.

 

[Mr.Conley]

Conley, 19,000 some odd people out of 200,000,000 some odd million.......hardly a problem more like a few, very few bad apples. No, America actually doesn't have a slavery problem that needs to be addressed.

Wrong again. Let's review.

And slavery is not just a worry in the third world—it is is increasingly an American problem. In the past five years alone, the press has reported 131 cases of forced labor in the United States involving 19,254 men, women, and children from a wide range of ethnic and racial groups. The victims are both foreign nationals and U.S. citizens, and about half of the cases involve prostitution. Estimates from government documents suggest that 50,000 people are trafficked into the U.S. every year for forced labor. The organization ECPAT-USA (End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography, and Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes) has calculated that 300,000 American children are “at risk” of being forced into the sex trade. Incidents of child sexual exploitation, including child pornography, child prostitution, online enticement of children, and child sex tourism have increased 750 percent in five years.

The 19,254 is just the number of people who have been discovered and saved. A far greater number are enslaved every year. Over the past decade, we've probably acquired 500,000 new slaves. That isn't a minor problem. An additional, "300,000 American children are 'at risk' of being forced into the sex trade." That is a huge number.

Besides, despite the fact that I've shown you that tens of thousands of people are known to be illegally used as slaves, you are advocating that instead of allowing the decades old laws that prohibit child labor, 16 hour works weeks, fair pay, etc. from at least making what is happening to these people illegal, you want to repeal them. That way the slavers will have no fear of government interference. They can kidnap even more slaves, and since you have legalized what these people are doing, they will never be brought to justice. If we repealed all the laws you propose, slavers could parade their captives down Main Street every morning and no one would be able to do anything. That's wrong.

 

[5stringJeff]

Oh please. My posts are mostly chock full of meaningful content, with amusing little jabs as a spicy bit of entertainment. You're completely misrepresenting the situation. Mostly is the mods are having their previous worldviews shattered, their neocon glasses ripped from their pointed heads brusquely, and like true little beaten authoritarian followers, they circle the wagons to repel the threatening reality with which they cannot cope. This is the real truth.

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

Oh yes. The truth puts me on cloud nine.:halo:

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Oh please. My posts are mostly chock full of meaningful content, with amusing little jabs as a spicy bit of entertainment. You're completely misrepresenting the situation. Mostly is the mods are having their previous worldviews shattered, their neocon glasses ripped from their pointed heads brusquely, and like true little beaten authoritarian followers, they circle the wagons to repel the threatening reality with which they cannot cope. This is the real truth.

Keep on banging that book into your forehead.

Can you still see the Pyramids?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Keep on banging that book into your forehead.

Can you still see the Pyramids?

Your desperate comments only prove the veracity of my scenario.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Your desperate comments only prove the veracity of my scenario.

Your defense mechanisms render pretty much ANYTHING that I say as support of your opinions... in your head, at least.

It's either:

He agrees with me, I'm right!

or

He disagrees with me, so it must be because he's jealous that I'm right!

Again I ask, when was the last time someone proved you wrong about something here?



The fact is, you bitching about personal attacks is about as hypocritical as you can get. Maybe OCA should just claim that his insults at you are amusing little jabs serving as a spicy bit of entertainment. It seems to make it ok for you to do it, at least. Aren't you against moral equivocation?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Your defense mechanisms render pretty much ANYTHING that I say as support of your opinions... in your head, at least.

It's either:

He agrees with me, I'm right!

or

He disagrees with me, so it must be because he's jealous that I'm right!

Again I ask, when was the last time someone proved you wrong about something here?



The fact is, you bitching about personal attacks is about as hypocritical as you can get. Maybe OCA should just claim that his insults at you are amusing little jabs serving as a spicy bit of entertainment. It seems to make it ok for you to do it, at least. Aren't you against moral equivocation?

That would be fine. But then he wants to ban me for calling him cindy, or something like that.

And it's true, I'm rarely proven wrong. ANd yes, I used to be a big globalist, now I'm not. Shall I be crucified?

 

[dilloduck]

That would be fine. But then he wants to ban me for calling him cindy, or something like that.

And it's true, I'm rarely proven wrong. ANd yes, I used to be a big globalist, now I'm not. Shall I be crucified?

yes--maybe then everyone would stop spending so damn much time trying to trap you instead of addressing your arguments.

 

[5stringJeff]

yes--maybe then everyone would stop spending so damn much time trying to trap you instead of addressing your arguments.

He's only got one argument: everyone should hate the Jews like he does.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

He's only got one argument: everyone should hate the Jews like he does.

This thread in particular is about international trade and our dependance on slave labor, jeff. WHat is your position on that?

 

[dilloduck]

He's only got one argument: everyone should hate the Jews like he does.

I see it differently--I don't even think he hates jews. I think he is questioning things that are being done in the name of Judaism, the wisdom of the UNs decision to partition Palestine the way it did, and the actions of American Jews who have different standards for America than the do for thier "homeland" .

 

[The ClayTaurus]

yes--maybe then everyone would stop spending so damn much time trying to trap you instead of addressing your arguments.

Oh please. We've addressed his arguments a LONG time ago. You claiming that it's somehow our fault that rational discussion with RWA rarely happens is absurd.

 

[dilloduck]

Oh please. We've addressed his arguments a LONG time ago. You claiming that it's somehow our fault that rational discussion with RWA rarely happens is absurd.

takes 2 to tango

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Oh please. We've addressed his arguments a LONG time ago. You claiming that it's somehow our fault that rational discussion with RWA rarely happens is absurd.

Calling me a liar in a fit of hysterics is not "addressing" an argument.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Calling me a liar in a fit of hysterics is not "addressing" an argument.

What's that? Misrepresentation of actual events? Couldn't be.


Prove where I called you a liar or was in a fit of hysterics. I'll take either or; you don't even have to prove both simultaneously, though you would get bonus points and a peanut butter cookie if you do.



Wait wait, lemme guess:

"I don't feel like it"

Am I right?

 

[The ClayTaurus]

takes 2 to tango

And it only takes one to jerk off, which is pretty much the equivalent to his contributions over the last half year: entirely self-serving.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

What's that? Misrepresentation of actual events? Couldn't be.


Prove where I called you a liar or was in a fit of hysterics. I'll take either or; you don't even have to prove both simultaneously, though you would get bonus points and a peanut butter cookie if you do.



Wait wait, lemme guess:

"I don't feel like it"

Am I right?

I've never been successfully refuted. Nor have my arguments been addressed. You show me my isses being addressed and I'll show you hysterical namecalling. (I'm certain they'll be the same posts.)