- Thread starter
- #41
I just read somewhere else that he was an ISIS supporter but I dont consider the source credible. I think the rumor mill is working overtime.This case is interesting. It took a long time for the name to come out. It makes me wonder if stuff got scrubbed.
I think the govt.wiped this guy's digital footprint clean.
Obviously that would aid your premise so why wouldn't you believe that?
Wouldn't, I think you mean. And I'm okay with that. This was just a response thread to Synthaholic's propaganda. I do think there's a cover-up the more I look at it.
Authorities went out of their way to delay the release of the guy's name; and they made an abnormally big deal of guiding the media into not using his name as well.
This guy seemed to have a lot of downtime and presumably spent a lot of time online; yet, it all looks very scrubbed. Little bits are left to make to make people talk in all directions that don't even make sense when you put them all together.
My statement is perfectly understandable and grammatically correct. I don't care what excuses you come up with for your own post. You are looking to needle in a narraitive to all this that matches your preconceived ideas.
The truth appears to be that this guy most likely doesn't fall along a single political spectrum. He's mixed raced, possibly a libertarian, has his own ideas of religion, his mom is a nut case, he shouldn't have owned guns.
1. He killed only whites.
2. He killed anybody who said they were Christians and spared the others.
I was speaking of the far reaching profile points that are amiss.