Oooops

[Godboy]

Then how do you explain the NBA, NFL and Olympic runners mostly being black?

What about it needs explanation?

Dumbest response EVER.

/thread

So, you didn't know what you meant when you posed the question?

We both know what I meant. ......

Not until you explain it we don't. What are you afraid of?

You're either playing dumb or you really are this dumb. Either way, its dumb.

 

[impuretrash]

Then how do you explain the NBA, NFL and Olympic runners mostly being black?

What about it needs explanation?

Dumbest response EVER.

/thread

So, you didn't know what you meant when you posed the question?

We both know what I meant. ......

Not until you explain it we don't. What are you afraid of?

Let's immigrate millions of uneducated migrants from 3rd world socialist nations, what's the worst that could possibly happen?

 

[Unkotare]

What about it needs explanation?

Dumbest response EVER.

/thread

So, you didn't know what you meant when you posed the question?

We both know what I meant. ......

Not until you explain it we don't. What are you afraid of?

Let's immigrate millions of uneducated migrants from 3rd world socialist nations, what's the worst that could possibly happen?

It worked out the last few times we did.

 

[JoeMoma]

View attachment 184048
View attachment 184051

No difference

Obviously (insert sarcasm here) the is no scientific basis for race.

Having said that, I beleive that Morton who was referenced in the OP’s link was wrong about many things concerning race.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

 

[Unkotare]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

 

[impuretrash]

Dumbest response EVER.

/thread

So, you didn't know what you meant when you posed the question?

We both know what I meant. ......

Not until you explain it we don't. What are you afraid of?

Let's immigrate millions of uneducated migrants from 3rd world socialist nations, what's the worst that could possibly happen?

It worked out the last few times we did.

You are so naive.

American immigration has always been primarily from European nations, very stable countries with low crime rates. nowadays, the majority of immigrants come from Mexico, one of the most violent countries on earth. And let's not forget that people of the 1800s and early 1900s were made of sterner stuff than today's people.

Report: More than half of immigrants on welfare

 

[Godboy]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Yes, I read both..the female twins are nothing more than an expression of dominant and recessive phenotype. No different than multicolored flowers of the same breed. The other article talks about Morton's outdated classification system and how modern science has improved on that classification while raising new questions regarding the human genome (as one would expect) and history.
However, instead of getting lost in the woods of high science it is always a good bet to look at the world around you. As I wrote, we can place whatever name we want on anything, the facts remain the same.
Whether an ancient European was dark skinned or light skinned or purple skinned is BESIDE the point.
The uneducated get too caught up on the genetic expressions (phenotype) of nature. Look at the contributions.

 

[Unkotare]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

 

[harmonica]

the blacks are much more obsessed with race than whites
you must be referring to the racist blacks

 

[Godboy]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

 

[Unkotare]

the blacks are much more obsessed with race than whites
.......

"obsessed with race"........ ^^^^^^^

 

[Unkotare]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

The failure of logic here is breathtaking.

 

[impuretrash]

the blacks are much more obsessed with race than whites
.......

"obsessed with race"........ ^^^^^^^

LOL a persecution complex is an important part of nearly every black person's identity, without whitey to blame for all their problems they might have to look within.

 

[Godboy]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

The failure of logic here is breathtaking.

Agreed. You didn't use any logic at all to rebut my post. You simply gave up, which is the smartest thing you've done since you started this thread.

 

[impuretrash]

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

The failure of logic here is breathtaking.

Agreed. You didn't use any logic at all to rebut my post.

Who needs logic when you have snark?

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

Kinda...but not really.
Populations are the results of hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection. Any animal population you see on Earth is the result of this natural
selection process. There are a combination of factors which affect genetic trait propagation.
The most important of which is environment, the second most important is sexual success as a result of a species successful adaptation to that environment. So...yes the Kenyan tends to be able run farther than the Inuit, for example.
However, it's not just because he is long and lean, but because he is the result of many millennia of people who successfully adapted to a particular environment. As with color, we tend to look at a particular genetic expression, based upon the environmental factors of today. However, this too is a form of adaptation as people who tend to have certain genetic advantages out compete other groups who do not have desired traits.
Therein lies the problem with modern progressive thought. The intentionally obtuse idea that hundreds of thousands of years of evolution have resulted in everyone being equal. It goes against logic, it goes against reason and it would be an intense laugh...if no one believed it...unfortunately.

 

[Godboy]

Race...or whatever you want to call it is not a social construct. If the 'races', peoples...groups..cultures of the world were equal then we would see equality across the board. We do not. There is no equality in nature.

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

Kinda...but not really.
Populations are the results of hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection. Any animal population you see on Earth is the result of this natural
selection process. There are a combination of factors which affect genetic trait propagation.
The most important of which is environment, the second most important is sexual success as a result of a species successful adaptation to that environment. So...yes the Kenyan tends to be able run farther than the Inuit, for example.
However, it's not just because he is long and lean, but because he is the result of many millennia of people who successfully adapted to a particular environment. As with color, we tend to look at a particular genetic expression, based upon the environmental factors of today. However, this too is a form of adaptation as people who tend to have certain genetic advantages out compete other groups who do not have desired traits.
Therein lies the problem with modern progressive thought. The intentionally obtuse idea that hundreds of thousands of years of evolution have resulted in everyone being equal. It goes against logic, it goes against reason and it would be an intense laugh...if no one believed it...unfortunately.

How would you explain the higher IQ of black Americans over their counterparts in Africa? Its only been a couple hundred years since theyve been here.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Did you read the article?

Why would it be necessary, unless the title lied about the what's in the article?

So you didn't. You should.

I definitely read it, but it doesnt make a good case for its title at all. It's basically saying "since we all started from the same place, we are the same race", but humans evolved into different groups based on their locations... and cultures too.

For example, why are farm boys known for being big and strong? Because generations of them worked hard on those farms, which caused their frames to grow.

Why are blacks phenomenal athletes in the US? Because generations of them were used for all sorts of manual labor when they were slaves.

Kenyans make the best long distance runners because they are tall, thin and they can go a lot longer without water since they live in a hot environment.

Asians have the highest IQs because they value education and therefore exercise their brains more than other races.

White people aren't the smartest or the most athletic, but they have a good balance of both. White Americans in particular produce the most successful people because, we put so much emphasis on success. We produce the most billionaires and created the greatest inventions in the history of mankind.

The failure of logic here is breathtaking.

Agreed. You didn't use any logic at all to rebut my post. You simply gave up, which is the smartest thing you've done since you started this thread.

He posts like that...he doesn't debate. He posits a thought, grunts out a few 'answers' and then goes away. Very surly type.