Once again, another active shooter.

Shall they pass useless laws?

You consider Universal background checks to be "useless?

Consider this. we have more guns than people...but only 1/3 of the households own ANY guns.

This is about a pretty small minority of gun fetishesists

Apparently Sassy is one of those

Yeah because convicted felons go to gun shops to buy guns. Lol.

Let me help you out, if someone is hell bent on getting a gun they will. Especially in Chicago....right out of the trunk of a car.

Fat lot of good a universal check would do, huh?
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!
---------------------------------------- sure , if Free Americans want to buy them Bode !!
 
Yeah because convicted felons go to gun shops to buy guns. Lol.

No they go to gun shows where background checks aren't required


wrong, doofus....... research shows that criminals don't get their guns from gun shows.....you moron.... they get them from other criminals who used straw buyers or stole them....

And guess what doofus.......... if a straw buyer can pass a background check, they can pass a universal background check for a private sale.......
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!
---------------------------------------- sure , if Free Americans want to buy them Bode !!
And even more guns...that's the ONLY solution.
 
A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

There was a gun-free zone sign on the door.
And here we see rightwing stupidity on full display.

Just because a business owner prohibits guns on his property doesn’t mean there are no guns on his property; a patron can carry a concealed firearm without the business owner knowing.

Hence the myth of ‘gun free zones.’
 
Yeah because convicted felons go to gun shops to buy guns. Lol.

No they go to gun shows where background checks aren't required
------------------------------------- you don't know what you talk about Lesh . Sadly 'gun shows' are regulated and the gun vendors follow the laws or they lose their ability to sell and are arrested if caught selling illegally Lesh .
 
A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

There was a gun-free zone sign on the door.
And here we see rightwing stupidity on full display.

Just because a business owner prohibits guns on his property doesn’t mean there are no guns on his property; a patron can carry a concealed firearm without the business owner knowing.

Hence the myth of ‘gun free zones.’

^^^^ Stupidity on full display.
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!

Read my thread called "Good Guy With A Gun".
‘Good guy with a gun’ – another ridiculous rightwing myth.

Study: Concealed Handgun Permits Don't Affect Crime Rate
 
I believe every citizen should be legally forced to own at least 3 guns per household -- that is the only way we can guarantee that our country would be safe from mass shooters.
If you filth would stop letting them out of prison we would be safe from them. Say hello to Sheriff Israel and his cowards.
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!

More laws! We need more laws!
Now it’s time for libertarian stupidity on full display.

Necessary, proper, and Constitutional laws such as UBCs do not a ‘totalitarian state’ make.
 
A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

There was a gun-free zone sign on the door.
And here we see rightwing stupidity on full display.

Just because a business owner prohibits guns on his property doesn’t mean there are no guns on his property; a patron can carry a concealed firearm without the business owner knowing.

Hence the myth of ‘gun free zones.’


Wrong......it is a crime....so law abiding people tend not to carry their guns into gun free zones......it means, moron, that this business is more likely, not less likely to have guns present on site........ relying on law abiding people to risk a criminal conviction to carry their gun into a gun free zone is a stupid thing to depend on for protection...
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!

More laws! We need more laws!
Now it’s time for libertarian stupidity on full display.

Necessary, proper, and Constitutional laws such as UBCs do not a ‘totalitarian state’ make.

More police. More laws. More walls. Only government can save us!
 
So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.
Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....
Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.
Nope, it was to prevent abuse of government power.

Stop lying.

Firearm Owners Protection Act - Wikipedia
 
I believe every citizen should be legally forced to own at least 3 guns per household -- that is the only way we can guarantee that our country would be safe from mass shooters.
If you filth would stop letting them out of prison we would be safe from them. Say hello to Sheriff Israel and his cowards.
Especially when you let criminals off the hook and let them head up gun lobbies...but hey, as long as he was responsible for slaughtering brown people, that's ok...just ask his buddy Elliot Abrams.....by the way, when you idiots were cheering Trump for talking about prison and sentencing reform, that was just bullshit huh? Figured...
Borowitz-OliverNorth.jpg
 
So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING
More guns! We need more guns!

Read my thread called "Good Guy With A Gun".
‘Good guy with a gun’ – another ridiculous rightwing myth.

Study: Concealed Handgun Permits Don't Affect Crime Rate


And law abiding owning and carrying guns doesn't increase the gun crime rate........meaning gun control focused on law abiding gun owners is stupid....

Meanwhile...more research that shows that law abiding gun owners carrying guns does effect the gun crime rate...especially for the victim of a violent crime who has a gun...

Do Right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime? - Crime Prevention Research Center


Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Journal of Legal Studies, 1997

The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)

The Concealed‐Handgun Debate, John R. Lott, Jr., Journal of Legal Studies, January 1998

Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns by Stephen Bronars and John R. Lott, Jr., American Economic Review, May 1998

The Impact of Gun Laws on Police Deaths by David Mustard, published in the Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

Privately Produced General Deterrence By BRUCE L. BENSON AND BRENT D. MAST, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness By CARLISLE E. MOODY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001

Safe-Storage Gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime By JOHN R. LOTT, JR., AND JOHN E. WHITLEY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001 — see Table 3 on page 679

Confirming More Guns, Less Crime by Florenz Plassmann and John Whitley, published in the Stanford Law Review, 2003

Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data by John R. Lott, Jr. and John Whitley, published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, June 2003, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185-198

Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime” by Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok, published in Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4 (1): Article 1, 2004

Abortion and Crime: Unwanted children and out-of-wedlock births, John R. Lott, Jr and John Whitley, October 2006.– page 14, Table 2.

The Impact of Banning Juvenile Gun Possession By Thomas B. Marvell, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001 — page 707, fn. 29

Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement By John R. Lott, Jr. and William Landes, published in The Bias Against Guns

More Readers of Gun Magazines, But Not More Crimes by Florenz Plassmann and John R. Lott, Jr. — many places in the text.

“More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott, Jr. (University of Chicago Press, 2010, 3rd edition).

“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody, Thomas B. Marvell, Paul R Zimmerman, and Fasil Alemante published in Review of Economics & Finance, 2014

“An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates” by Mark Giusa published in Applied Economics Letters, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2014

“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..

“The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 6, Number 2 May 2009

“Did John Lott Provide Bad Data to the NRC? A Note on Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang” by Carlisle e. Moody, John R Lott, Jr, and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2013

“On the Choice of Control Variables in the Crime Equation” by Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 5, pages 696–715, October 2010.

“The Impact of Right-to-Carry Laws: A Critique of the 2014 Version of Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang,” Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Econ Journal Watch, January 2018: 51-66.

More Guns, Less Crime: A Response to Ayres and Donohue’s 1999 book review in the American Law and Economics Review by John R. Lott, Jr.

Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime Revisited: Clustering, Measurement Error, and State-by-State Break downs by John R. Lott, Jr.
 

Forum List

Back
Top