On Milo and Free Speech

100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.
 
Freedom of speech is not a requirement to listen.

He can speak all he wants about whatever he wants.

His problem is that people have decided that they don't want to listen. Simple.

Being prevented to speak to the people that invited you by an outside agency is NOT the people deciding they don't want to hear.

It would be like the NAACP inviting Obama to speak at Berkely and the KKK burned down the campus to prevent it.

In this case a campus conservative organization invited Milo to speak and outside agitators and rioters burned down the campus to prevent it.

That's NOT people saying they don't want to listen, that's people preventing those who invited Milo from hearing him.

Full meltdown mode now.

No, that would be you idiots who still can't accept Trump won, as evidenced by your sig. :lmao:
 
No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.
Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

Freedom of speech, you idiot, is not extended into private entities or enterprises. THEY have a right to deny a voice to anyone if it's on THEIR property or time and place.
I can't believe how so many understand so little about what the laws of the land mean.

HE WAS INVITED TO SPEAK AND OUTSIDE AGENCIES BURNED DOWN THE CAMPUS TO STOP IT.

Come on, even you, a low information, (paid SOROS) hack can see that as obvious.

If Barack Obama was invited to speak on a campus and the KKK came and burned down the campus to stop it, you guys would be screaming about free speech and the "right" (even though the KKK were always Democrats) intimidating free speech.

Stop pretending you can't see it.

And what if they'd simply turned him away in the first place? He has no constitutional entitlement to schedule a speaking engagement at any university whether they want him or not.
 
The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age.

READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia

Look no one made him say 13 year olds are sexually mature. It came right out of his mouth.

Past puberty. Able to reproduce. It's clinical. Now emotional maturity to handle a sexual relationship in my humble opinion doesn't even come around these days till past the age of consent laws in many states.

And I don't like the Romeo and Juliet laws that would allow for sex between a 15 and a 14 year old.

I'm sorry I can't agree.

I think his statements are indefensible.
 
100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.

The question is, was/is the Right's enthusiastic embrace of the gay Milo a tacit concession by conservatives that they have lost their war against gay rights?
 
Liberals have no right to gloat here, because they would tolerate someone like Milo in their numbers without batting an eyelash. Look at how they have tolerated Bill Clinton, a man who seduced his 21-year-old intern and got oral sex from her while he was making phone calls in the Oval Office. Liberals, you are disgusting degenerates, and you should be ashamed that you think you have any right to condemn Milo for what he did. This is an issue that only conservatives have a say on. Liberals, you have lost all credibility on any sexual scandal, and you should shut the fuck up.

Oh please. Monica L was of age and very proud of her affair with Clinton, that's why she bragged about it to Linda Tripp. Comparing that affair to M.Y. is a reach so far up your ass I bet you never get your head pulled out. We'll send flowers.
No, you're wrong. Monica was a simple-minded girl who was young enough to be Bill's daughter. My professor friend told me that if he did the same exact thing with a 21-year-old student, he would be stripped of tenure, fired from his position, and never hired at any other university. Why does Bill get away with something that a professor is not allowed to do? You are a disgusting man to think Bill was at all justified in doing this, and you should be worried about the fate of your soul.
 
No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.
Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

Freedom of speech, you idiot, is not extended into private entities or enterprises. THEY have a right to deny a voice to anyone if it's on THEIR property or time and place.
I can't believe how so many understand so little about what the laws of the land mean.

HE WAS INVITED TO SPEAK AND OUTSIDE AGENCIES BURNED DOWN THE CAMPUS TO STOP IT.

Come on, even you, a low information, (paid SOROS) hack can see that as obvious.

If Barack Obama was invited to speak on a campus and the KKK came and burned down the campus to stop it, you guys would be screaming about free speech and the "right" (even though the KKK were always Democrats) intimidating free speech.

Stop pretending you can't see it.

And what if they'd simply turned him away in the first place? He has no constitutional entitlement to schedule a speaking engagement at any university whether they want him or not.

What if? Now you are dealing with hypothesis because you don't have the facts.

They didn't turn him away. Those that invited Milo wanted to hear him and they were prevented by outside agencies who rioted.

Simon and Schuster for example have a perfect right to cancel Milo's book. That's not preventing free speech. They have every right to decide who they will and will not publish.
 
100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.

The question is, was/is the Right's enthusiastic embrace of the gay Milo a tacit concession by conservatives that they have lost their war against gay rights?
I never embraced MIlo, I thought he was a disgusting man when he boasted about having a black man's penis in his mouth. People should not talk like that at a political discussion, it brutalizes the society we live in.
 
Liberals have no right to gloat here, because they would tolerate someone like Milo in their numbers without batting an eyelash. Look at how they have tolerated Bill Clinton, a man who seduced his 21-year-old intern and got oral sex from her while he was making phone calls in the Oval Office. Liberals, you are disgusting degenerates, and you should be ashamed that you think you have any right to condemn Milo for what he did. This is an issue that only conservatives have a say on. Liberals, you have lost all credibility on any sexual scandal, and you should shut the fuck up.

Oh please. Monica L was of age and very proud of her affair with Clinton, that's why she bragged about it to Linda Tripp. Comparing that affair to M.Y. is a reach so far up your ass I bet you never get your head pulled out. We'll send flowers.

Um, this is stupid. That sounds pretty consistent. We don't like older men preying on the young. Whether they are 13 or 21.

You defeated your own argument.
 
100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.
What makes you think we are becoming a more liberal country? The results of the last election? Just to clue you in, the Democratic Party has lost more than 1000 seats at the state and local level in the last eight years.
 
Liberals have no right to gloat here, because they would tolerate someone like Milo in their numbers without batting an eyelash. Look at how they have tolerated Bill Clinton, a man who seduced his 21-year-old intern and got oral sex from her while he was making phone calls in the Oval Office. Liberals, you are disgusting degenerates, and you should be ashamed that you think you have any right to condemn Milo for what he did. This is an issue that only conservatives have a say on. Liberals, you have lost all credibility on any sexual scandal, and you should shut the fuck up.

Oh please. Monica L was of age and very proud of her affair with Clinton, that's why she bragged about it to Linda Tripp. Comparing that affair to M.Y. is a reach so far up your ass I bet you never get your head pulled out. We'll send flowers.

Um, this is stupid. That sounds pretty consistent. We don't like older men preying on the young. Whether they are 13 or 21.

You defeated your own argument.

Trump dumped TWO wives for younger women. I suppose where you people draw the line is just short of Trump's behavior.
 
As long as liberals defend rapist, assaulter, and seducer Bill Clinton, and his wife who enabled him, they have no right to talk about Milo.
 
The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age.

READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia

Look no one made him say 13 year olds are sexually mature. It came right out of his mouth.

Sexually mature is a biological term. It means you are physically able to procreate.
 
100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.
What makes you think we are becoming a more liberal country? The results of the last election? Just to clue you in, the Democratic Party has lost more than 1000 seats at the state and local level in the last eight years.

And in the meantime gay rights, a conservative nemesis, made unprecedented gains. That is how conservatism is losing.
 
100 years ago girls as young as 14 were getting married and having children. But standards have changed, and the age of majority is now above that. In Nevada, the age of consent is 16. In some states, it is higher.

What that means is that if an adult has a sexual encounter with a 13-year-old, he or she is guilty of a crime. We have to set the boundaries somewhere, and those of us who are parents have decided that we don't want adult predators to have sex with children and get away with it.

If anything, our society has become less tolerant of this kind of thing over the years as evidence has mounted that sexual encounters at a too early age are psychologically harmful to young people.
Yes...as we become a more liberal country......we are becoming more intolerant with underage sexual encounters.
What makes you think we are becoming a more liberal country? The results of the last election? Just to clue you in, the Democratic Party has lost more than 1000 seats at the state and local level in the last eight years.

And in the meantime gay rights, a conservative nemesis, made unprecedented gains. That is how conservatism is losing.
Same-sex marriage lost in every state where the people were allowed to vote on it, even in deep blue states like California.

Same-sex marriage was IMPOSED on the American people by an unelected Supreme Court, just like abortion was IMPOSED.

You have gained nothing.
 
The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age.

READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia

Look no one made him say 13 year olds are sexually mature. It came right out of his mouth.

Sexually mature is a biological term. It means you are physically able to procreate.
Are they mentally and legally able to consent. If not, why not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top