On Milo and Free Speech

[bodecea]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

If it is homosexuals who lack these boundaries....why are 1 in 4 girls sexually abused before they reach 18 by heterosexual men........many their own family members?????

 

[koshergrl]

No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.

Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

 

[teapartysamurai]

And he said he believed in the age of consent.

Thirteen years old??????

 

[koshergrl]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

If it is homosexuals who lack these boundaries....why are 1 in 4 girls sexually abused before they reach 18 by heterosexual men........many their own family members?????

You need to get a different porn site, bodey.

 

[bodecea]

And he said he believed in the age of consent.

Thirteen years old??????

You are now replying to a vapid Milo devotee.....defending him to the ends of the earth.

 

[Blackrook]

And guno, don't gloat. We know that you and your fellow liberals tolerate perversion among yourselves, and many of you are openly practicing perverts. That is because you have turned your backs to God, so he has cursed you with homosexuality, as Paul said to the Romans.

 

[Mac1958]

No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.

Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

Yep. There's just no way to know if that kind of statement is denial, dishonesty or delusion.
.

 

[bodecea]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

If it is homosexuals who lack these boundaries....why are 1 in 4 girls sexually abused before they reach 18 by heterosexual men........many their own family members?????

You need to get a different porn site, bodey.

I don't do porn. I'm guessing you know all about it, eh?

 

[tinydancer]

The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age.

READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia

 

[koshergrl]

No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.

Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

Yep. There's just no way to know if that kind of statement is denial, dishonesty or delusion.
.

It doesn't matter what causes it, the important thing is to eliminate the fools who engage in it.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

You're right that IF Milo was liberal he would get away with it. Look at Lena Dunham admitting she molested her sister!

However, if that's a double standard, it's one I can live with. I have no desire to tolerate that kind of thing on the right side of the aisle.

 

[bodecea]

And guno, don't gloat. We know that you and your fellow liberals tolerate perversion among yourselves, and many of you are openly practicing perverts. That is because you have turned your backs to God, so he has cursed you with homosexuality, as Paul said to the Romans.

And yet...the RW held Milo up as some kind of champion until yesterday AND....make a pedophile the Speaker of the House....2 steps away from the Presidency...just recently.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”
READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia


Been real busy lately and haven't been able to participate.

Since then, something has happened I feel I need to talk about.

I said to Pillars that I was not a Milo fan and I'm not.

Be that as it may I still feel the man had a right to give his speech. Free speech works.

All the "protesters" (aka rioters) did was lionize the man and make him a martyr.

If a bad person is a bad person, they will hang themselves with their own words and Milo certainly did.

As usual with anyone who gets caught with his foot in his mouth, Milo claimed he was taken out of context but I read the transcript and the words are indefensible, context or no.

The idea that pedophilia is limited to ONLY children under the age of puberty and once puberty happens it's open season is just indefensible.

I, as a mother, am disgusted by it.

Last word, free speech, not trying to shut up people, works.

Let 'em talk if you think they are wrong.

Remember the old saying, "Give 'em enough rope and the will hang themselves."

Milo, certainly did.

He can spew his garbage all he wants. CPAC, Berkeley, et al. have a right to tell him to spew it somewhere else. And they did.
And it's so funny that the far right dickheads took so long to see that this goon is nothing but a bomb-throwing nazi. Hahahahha

 

[Tommy Tainant]

If you make your living abusing people then you can expect some reaction to that.

I am struggling to see this youngster as a victim of any kind.

I dont agree with burning cars and smashing windows but the people who were out there had just as much right to put their opinion forward as he did.

He had to cancel one talk but he still had multiple avenues to get his dreary thoughts "out there".

Where was he silenced ?

 

[bodecea]

Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”
READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia


Been real busy lately and haven't been able to participate.

Since then, something has happened I feel I need to talk about.

I said to Pillars that I was not a Milo fan and I'm not.

Be that as it may I still feel the man had a right to give his speech. Free speech works.

All the "protesters" (aka rioters) did was lionize the man and make him a martyr.

If a bad person is a bad person, they will hang themselves with their own words and Milo certainly did.

As usual with anyone who gets caught with his foot in his mouth, Milo claimed he was taken out of context but I read the transcript and the words are indefensible, context or no.

The idea that pedophilia is limited to ONLY children under the age of puberty and once puberty happens it's open season is just indefensible.

I, as a mother, am disgusted by it.

Last word, free speech, not trying to shut up people, works.

Let 'em talk if you think they are wrong.

Remember the old saying, "Give 'em enough rope and the will hang themselves."

Milo, certainly did.

He can spew his garbage all he wants. CPAC, Berkeley, et al. have a right to tell him to spew it somewhere else. And they did.
And it's so funny that the far right dickheads took so long to see that this goon is nothing but a bomb-throwing nazi. Hahahahha

Some STILL don't see it.

 

[Blackrook]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

If it is homosexuals who lack these boundaries....why are 1 in 4 girls sexually abused before they reach 18 by heterosexual men........many their own family members?????

You need to get a different porn site, bodey.

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

If it is homosexuals who lack these boundaries....why are 1 in 4 girls sexually abused before they reach 18 by heterosexual men........many their own family members?????

You need to get a different porn site, bodey.

Homosexuals commit proportionally far more acts of sexual abuse on minors:
Family Research Council

 

[teapartysamurai]

The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age.

READ: Transcript of Milo Yiannopoulos Video on Pedophilia

Look no one made him say 13 year olds are sexually mature. It came right out of his mouth.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

And guno, don't gloat. We know that you and your fellow liberals tolerate perversion among yourselves, and many of you are openly practicing perverts. That is because you have turned your backs to God, so he has cursed you with homosexuality, as Paul said to the Romans.

And yet...the RW held Milo up as some kind of champion until yesterday AND....make a pedophile the Speaker of the House....2 steps away from the Presidency...just recently.

He was a Breitbart/Steve Bannon darling. Just goes to show how fucked up the right wing really is.

 

[bodecea]

Most heterosexual men instinctively know that is wrong to have sex, or even be attracted to, girls below the age of consent.

Homosexuals, I think, lack these boundaries, so they are more likely to get involved in sex with boys below the age of consent.

Milo has made it clear that he does not know the difference between what is appropriate and what is inappropriate when it comes to sexual attraction to underaged boys. He has made it clear that he sees nothing wrong with having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

If he was a Democratic Senator or a Hollywood liberal, he would get away with it.

But he is a conservative, so he will not get away with it.

And that is because conservatives don't tolerate perverts to associate with us.

And that is a good thing, I think.

You're right that IF Milo was liberal he would get away with it. Look at Lena Dunham admitting she molested her sister!

However, if that's a double standard, it's one I can live with. I have no desire to tolerate that kind of thing on the right side of the aisle.

We won't know if that's true or not, will we? Milo was a RW darling thru and thru.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No one infringed on Milo's freedom of speech.

Sure they did. He was paid and scheduled to speak.
And they prevented him.

That's infringing freedom of speech.

You mentally ill commies don't understand it, you never will. It's beyond the ability of your teeny, tiny, brainwashed brainpans to understand elevated concepts like law, and freedom, and human rights.

No it's not. Not even close.