Okay Progressives, What does raising taxes on the Rich and Corporations do for you?

[ESay]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

 

[Orangecat]

Orangecat, you post to establish or to confirm that you’re a fool?

My reasons are different from yours, solipsist.

 

[danielpalos]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

What if we goad Capitalists into automating for their bottom line? Supply, supply supply is what supply-side economics is about.

 

[danielpalos]

Orangecat, you post to establish or to confirm that you’re a fool?

My reasons are different from yours, solipsist.

Appeals to ignorance over reason is solipsist.

 

[Orangecat]

Appeals to ignorance

No one is appealing to you. Stop whining and get a job, kid.

 

[ESay]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

What if we goad Capitalists into automating for their bottom line? Supply, supply supply is what supply-side economics is about.

What do you mean? What you mean by bottom line and 'goad'?

 

[danielpalos]

Appeals to ignorance

No one is appealing to you. Stop whining and get a job, kid.

Parler misses you.

 

[danielpalos]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

What if we goad Capitalists into automating for their bottom line? Supply, supply supply is what supply-side economics is about.

What do you mean? What you mean by bottom line and 'goad'?

I thought you understood economics?

 

[Orangecat]

Parler misses you.

Say parler again, you autistic fuck.
It's become your personal version of a white flag.

 

[danielpalos]

Parler misses you.

Say parler again, you autistic fuck.
It's become your personal version of a white flag.

Ad hominems are worthless. Do you have any valid arguments or not?

 

[Orangecat]

Ad hominems are worthless. Do you have any valid arguments or not?

As if "Parler misses you" is a valid argument. Lulz.
Nonsensical word salads are worthless. Do you have any valid arguments or not?

 

[danielpalos]

Ad hominems are worthless. Do you have any valid arguments or not?

As if "Parler misses you" is a valid argument. Lulz.
Nonsensical word salads are worthless. Do you have any valid arguments or not?

Yes, I do. Why don't you?

 

[ESay]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

What if we goad Capitalists into automating for their bottom line? Supply, supply supply is what supply-side economics is about.

What do you mean? What you mean by bottom line and 'goad'?

I thought you understood economics?

I hope I do. But I am far from an expert in it.

 

[danielpalos]

I am for raising the minimum wage as a more market friendly manner for raising tax revenue.

DanielPalos, to the extent of its purchasing power, the federal minimum wage rate reduces incidences and extents of poverty among the working-poor.
I’m among the firm proponents for increasing and retaining its purchasing power. The federal minimum wage rate is not, (actually or in effect) a tax and it doesn’t increase tax revenues.
Respectfully, Supposn

I agree with you that Labor must be able to afford our first world economy.

Squeezing tax money from Capitalists should happen to merely promote the general welfare. We need an Institutional upward pressure on wages not any form of, race to the bottom in any first world economy. Capitalists leaving for cheaper wages should be excised the difference to eliminate it as a rational choice in our first world economy.

If you squeeze money from 'capitalists', they can answer with two possible steps - raising the price of their production and reducing investments in their factories.

What if we goad Capitalists into automating for their bottom line? Supply, supply supply is what supply-side economics is about.

What do you mean? What you mean by bottom line and 'goad'?

I thought you understood economics?

I hope I do. But I am far from an expert in it.

Ok. We should goad Capitalists to automate for their bottom line, their profit motive.

Go ahead and automate my good Capitalists, I goad thee, I goad thee, I goad thee.

 

[Orangecat]

Yes, I do.

Parler misses you.

 

[Orangecat]

Go ahead and automate my good Capitalists, I goad thee, I goad thee, I goad thee.

Were you retarded at birth or just failed to develop?

 

[danielpalos]

If right wingers could not resort to fallacy, they would have no arguments at all.

 

[Orangecat]

If right wingers could not resort to fallacy, they would have no arguments at all.

Okay, one-trick-ponyboy.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.

Parler misses you.