Okay Progressives, What does raising taxes on the Rich and Corporations do for you?

Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor? Please enlighten US about those policies....
You simply appeal to ignorance of the law, like usual when it concerns the Poor and repetitions.

It is about equal protection of at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation.
The fact is that DP is for Open Borders which lowers wages and yet wants an artificially high MW.
So DP, where is this money coming from?
In right wing fantasy, you can make up any Hoax you want.

Raise the minimum wage.
No...eliminate Trespassers and Business Visas.
Free market Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time there is a market based opportunity.
It has it’s up and downs but what do you do with the fact that everyone wants to move here?
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens
True we have the richest "poor" people in the world.

We are the wealthiest nation on earth and you brag about not being Third World?

And our so called "poor" have it pretty good.

TVs, Cable, cell phones, etc etc etc not to mention we have the fattest poor people on the planet so we know they are getting more than enough to eat.

What more do you think "poor" people need to be given by the rest of us?

Weight is not an indicator of wealth
It is more of an indicator of a poor diet high in fats and carbs

It is an indicator that they have more than enough to eat.
 
It's important to remember that the wealthy would not be so if the government had not bailed them out in 2008 and 2020 while both times the poor were left with austerity programs and the middle class shrank. Anyone who simps for the rich anymore is a disgrace to this country.

Untitled drawing (80).png
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens
True we have the richest "poor" people in the world.

We are the wealthiest nation on earth and you brag about not being Third World?

And our so called "poor" have it pretty good.

TVs, Cable, cell phones, etc etc etc not to mention we have the fattest poor people on the planet so we know they are getting more than enough to eat.

What more do you think "poor" people need to be given by the rest of us?

Weight is not an indicator of wealth
It is more of an indicator of a poor diet high in fats and carbs

It is an indicator that they have more than enough to eat.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens
True we have the richest "poor" people in the world.

We are the wealthiest nation on earth and you brag about not being Third World?

And our so called "poor" have it pretty good.

TVs, Cable, cell phones, etc etc etc not to mention we have the fattest poor people on the planet so we know they are getting more than enough to eat.

What more do you think "poor" people need to be given by the rest of us?

Weight is not an indicator of wealth
It is more of an indicator of a poor diet high in fats and carbs

It is an indicator that they have more than enough to eat.

Poor diet
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
Programs for the poor are stupid like the libbers who create them.
My problem is not with helping those who cannot provide for themselves, such as the sick or handicapped, and not with providing temporary help until someone can get back on their feet, like with with Unemployment Insurance. My problem lies with those who CAN work and who have access to jobs but choose NOT to work, yet expect society to pay them for it.
Employment is at the will of either even in Right to Work States.

Employers simply choose to be lazy and not hire labor for a better wage. There is no unemployment under Capitalism only underpayment on a for-profit basis.
You're not talking about employment, because that's not what you want. You're using employment verbage when you really mean welfare.
Of course...the "poor" are entitled to everything you have worked for.
Nobody is making a wage-slave out of you according to the right wing; just quit on an at-will basis, right wingers. Complaining only means you don't have the morals you allege and are just Hoaxsters about right wing morality.
Is it morally right when men with tits compete in women's sports?
Is it morally right when a man puts his dick in another man's ass?
Is it morally right when BLM/ANTIFA, go and burn down minority Businesses?
Is it morally right when a black thug face punches an old lady minding her own business?

You throw the word Morals out there ,but do you know what it means?
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
Programs for the poor are stupid like the libbers who create them.
My problem is not with helping those who cannot provide for themselves, such as the sick or handicapped, and not with providing temporary help until someone can get back on their feet, like with with Unemployment Insurance. My problem lies with those who CAN work and who have access to jobs but choose NOT to work, yet expect society to pay them for it.
Employment is at the will of either even in Right to Work States.

Employers simply choose to be lazy and not hire labor for a better wage. There is no unemployment under Capitalism only underpayment on a for-profit basis.
You're not talking about employment, because that's not what you want. You're using employment verbage when you really mean welfare.
Nope. Means testing is both necessary and proper when merely solving for a simple lack of Capital, may not be enough.
Very good, you may be learning something. Are we to take from this that you have decided that simply refusing to work should not entitle you to welfare payments?
 
It's important to remember that the wealthy would not be so if the government had not bailed them out in 2008 and 2020 while both times the poor were left with austerity programs and the middle class shrank. Anyone who simps for the rich anymore is a disgrace to this country.

View attachment 415250
So when Bill Gates(flaming liberal), Warren Buffet(flaming liberal), Jeff Bezos(flaming liberal), Steve Jobs(flaming liberal) got their bail outs, why didnt you do something about Joe Biden since he was in charge of the bailout money?

 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor? Please enlighten US about those policies....
You simply appeal to ignorance of the law, like usual when it concerns the Poor and repetitions.

It is about equal protection of at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation.
You have to translate Daniel-speak. What he is saying here is he wants those who choose not to work and who have never held a job to be treated just like those who have worked for decades and have been laid off through no fault of their own. He somehow thinks the law isn't fair because one group gets paid while the other doesn't.
Being legal to the law, what a concept.
We are. The law is very clear. If you get laid off through no fault of your own, you can receive unemployment compensation. What is unclear about that?
Equality and equal protection of the law is even more clear than that. What part of at the will of either party is unclear?
None at all. The law is applied equally as designed. There is no unfairness at all. It doesn't matter what your skin color is or what your genitals look like or whose poster you have up on your wall, if you get laid off through no fault of your own, you can collect Unemployment Compensation. If you simply refuse to work or quit because you don't want to work you can't. We have equal protection under the law. You keep saying we don't, but have never established your case because all you do is just repeat that one thing over and over, as if it's significant. It's not.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens

Wars on the other side of the globe do not
The War on Poverty sustains the poor but doesn't help them become not poor.
Raise the minimum wage so even the Poor can help generate more tax revenue.
You want to take more from those who earn it (business owners) so you can give it to those who do not (unskilled workers) so you can take more from them. Is that about the size of it?
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
I take care of my family and 3 children, why should i have to pay for others welfare when they dont pay for mine? How much taxes do pan handlers pay in, for making 30,000 dollars of free money? SHouldnt they be paying their fair share?
Employment is at the will of either party. Don't work hard if you are only going to develop a bad attitude for it. You should be grateful for being able to be richer than the Poor.
Of course it's at will. If you don't make money for your boss he can let you go. If you don't want to work for your boss, you can quit. No one is forced to hire you and you are not forced to work. What you don't get, though is to be paid when you can but refuse to work.
How is that, at the will of either party?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
This is where you reveal vast stupidity. Employment at the will of either party means either you or the employer can terminate your employment by him. That's all it means. You seem to think it means that either one of you can force you to be employed by said employer. It does not mean that, and until you understand that simple reality you will never advance.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens

Wars on the other side of the globe do not
The War on Poverty sustains the poor but doesn't help them become not poor.
Raise the minimum wage so even the Poor can help generate more tax revenue.
And the businesses will lay off workers, dumbass.
There is a terminal stupidity that apparently believes businesses will not react when conditions change, that the government can simply dictate wages and the companies will simply pay more. Dumb, I know.
 
So here we go one more time....What does raising the taxes on the Wealthy and Corporations do for you Progressives personally?
It helps slow deficit spending if not balance the budget.
Are you fucking mentally ill? Again you wont answer my question, what does raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations do for YOU?

no, it doesnt slow deficit spending and wont balance the budget because the Progs always spend more...

For every dollar brought in, the progs spend 3 times that amount. Why else does Nan From San Fransicko, want to pass another 3 trillion dollar relief package?
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor? Please enlighten US about those policies....
You simply appeal to ignorance of the law, like usual when it concerns the Poor and repetitions.

It is about equal protection of at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation.
The fact is that DP is for Open Borders which lowers wages and yet wants an artificially high MW.
So DP, where is this money coming from?
In right wing fantasy, you can make up any Hoax you want.

Raise the minimum wage.
No...eliminate Trespassers and Business Visas.
Free market Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time there is a market based opportunity.
It has it’s up and downs but what do you do with the fact that everyone wants to move here?
I always like to tell people who trash the US to apply the gates test. In a though experiment, put a wall around the entire country. No one can move either in or out. Then open gates in that wall and watch which way people go.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens

Wars on the other side of the globe do not
The War on Poverty sustains the poor but doesn't help them become not poor.
Raise the minimum wage so even the Poor can help generate more tax revenue.
And the businesses will lay off workers, dumbass.
Doesnt happen as long as there is a market for your service or product.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
The "right wing" did not create all the welfare programs that have cost trillions and done nothing to eliminate poverty. IOW, you're complaining about the left wing's approach to the problem. Did you realize that, or were you on the bong at the time and oblivious?
The right wing is wasting money on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. There is no general warfare clause in our federal Constitution. We do have an express general welfare clause that right wingers love to complain about.
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history.


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288

Our War on Poverty helps AMERICAN Citizens
True we have the richest "poor" people in the world.

We are the wealthiest nation on earth and you brag about not being Third World?

And our so called "poor" have it pretty good.

TVs, Cable, cell phones, etc etc etc not to mention we have the fattest poor people on the planet so we know they are getting more than enough to eat.

What more do you think "poor" people need to be given by the rest of us?

Weight is not an indicator of wealth
It is more of an indicator of a poor diet high in fats and carbs

It is an indicator that they have more than enough to eat.

Poor diet

Nope overeating.

You don't become obese by eating 1500 calories a day.
 
Very good, you may be learning something. Are we to take from this that you have decided that simply refusing to work should not entitle you to welfare payments?
Unemployment compensation is a distinct policy. It is more market friendly and efficient at automatically stabilizing our economy, on an at-will basis. More expensive means testing is for those for whom, merely solving for a lack of capital under our form of Capitalism, may not be enough.
 
Very good, you may be learning something. Are we to take from this that you have decided that simply refusing to work should not entitle you to welfare payments?
Unemployment compensation is a distinct policy. It is more market friendly and efficient at automatically stabilizing our economy, on an at-will basis. More expensive means testing is for those for whom, merely solving for a lack of capital under our form of Capitalism, may not be enough.
UC serves a very specific purpose. Leave it alone. If you want to be paid to stay in the basement smoking pot, try to get your legislators to create a program to do it, but stop trying to hijack UC and pretend it somehow should cover you if only people would pretend words mean different things.
 
Abolish your right wing, general warfare spending on our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want to be taxed for them.
Oh by the way dannyboy....Some facts that you seem to be missing..


The War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion -- three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
The War on Poverty Has Cost $22 Trillion - NCPA
ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?article_id=25288


Up to 2019 there was 23 trillion dollars of debt until Joe Biden working with China released the Kung Flu upon US. But notice how that war on poverty never got rid of poverty and such waste because when you pay people not to work, they wont. Take that 1 trillion away and soon everyone is working....
Only because right wingers have nothing but bigotry not faithfulness to our Constitution. We could have literally solved simple poverty in a more automatically stabilizing method than we do now, yesterday; but for right wing bigotry and nothing but Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor.
Repeal of public policies that actually benefit the Poor? Please enlighten US about those policies....
You simply appeal to ignorance of the law, like usual when it concerns the Poor and repetitions.

It is about equal protection of at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation.
You have to translate Daniel-speak. What he is saying here is he wants those who choose not to work and who have never held a job to be treated just like those who have worked for decades and have been laid off through no fault of their own. He somehow thinks the law isn't fair because one group gets paid while the other doesn't.
Being legal to the law, what a concept.
We are. The law is very clear. If you get laid off through no fault of your own, you can receive unemployment compensation. What is unclear about that?
Equality and equal protection of the law is even more clear than that. What part of at the will of either party is unclear?
None at all. The law is applied equally as designed. There is no unfairness at all. It doesn't matter what your skin color is or what your genitals look like or whose poster you have up on your wall, if you get laid off through no fault of your own, you can collect Unemployment Compensation. If you simply refuse to work or quit because you don't want to work you can't. We have equal protection under the law. You keep saying we don't, but have never established your case because all you do is just repeat that one thing over and over, as if it's significant. It's not.
At-will means for both parties. Requiring a work ethic from Labor as the least wealthy in our republic is not equal protection of the laws. There should be no moral prejudice at law involved. Labor must be able to enjoy equal protection of the law in an at-will employment State for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in an at-will employment State. Only right wingers have a problem with free market Capitalism, especially when it involves the Poor as the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism. Only right wingers are willing to Hoax around because they may believe the Poor actually are worth-less under Capitalism.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top