- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,163
- 140,692
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #21
Your campaigns were full of rhetoric and bumper sticker slogans. Now that you have actually been elected it is time to put some meat on those bones.
Its easy to say "cut spending" "eliminate waste" "end earmarks"....now you have to actually do it. What are you going to cut? What will be the impact of those cuts? What will happen if they cut the Social Security, Medicare ?
How does a Tea Party candidate get things done in Washington? it is still the same old city.
I think they are in for a rude awakening and will be the same old Washington insiders they campaigned so hard against
Me Personally. I'd work on fair labor laws. Union's out of Government completely. When Government Workers swear Allegiance to the Union, it would be so nice that they were referring to the USA, let's remove the temptation. Unions are obsolete, at least their legal activity and function.
Government Salaries and hours worked per week is questionable. Extended vacation time. Waste Waste Waste.
You seem to put so much faith in Tea Party Members that hold office, how many do you think there are? Or are you just being silly? I thought so.
I'm looking at the opportunity to see the various levels of Government, start applying some real Federalism, where things are experimented with, tried, and refined at the State levels, rather than one size fits all Centralized Legislation that does not adapt to concern or need. Governing isn't always about what is convenient for the Governing Body Itself. It gets lazy and sloppy that way. Governing is about maintaining and applying proper remedy. It is Government that is supposed to adapt to circumstance and correctly apply through reason, not expect reality to bend to it's will without question.
Me Personally. I'd work on fair labor laws. Union's out of Government completely. When Government Workers swear Allegiance to the Union, it would be so nice that they were referring to the USA, let's remove the temptation. Unions are obsolete, at least their legal activity and function
I think you overestimate the strength of Federal Government Unions. From personal experience they have very little strength. Government salaries are set by law and are not subject to negotiation. The pay structure and promotion guidelines are also established by law.Government employees are prohibited by law from striking so they have no bargaining chips in negotiation. The only thing Government unions can negotiate are working conditions.
Government Salaries and hours worked per week is questionable. Extended vacation time. Waste Waste Waste.
Government salaries and annual pay increases are established by a formula set by Congress. As in most things government, it is very slow to react to changes in prevailing wages. Generally, when wages skyrocket, government salaries and the ability to hire competitively suffer. When the economy crashes, government wages and ability to hire highly qualified employess increase.
Vacation time is the same that it has been for over 50 years
You seem to put so much faith in Tea Party Members that hold office, how many do you think there are? Or are you just being silly? I thought so.
The point is that I do not have much faith. I think they are in for a rude awakening on what it takes to get things done in Washington. I don't think cutting that budget is as easy as they think
Me Personally. I'd work on fair labor laws. Union's out of Government completely. When Government Workers swear Allegiance to the Union, it would be so nice that they were referring to the USA, let's remove the temptation. Unions are obsolete, at least their legal activity and function
As I stated above, Government Unions (AFGE and NFFE) are a sham and have little influence. Unions as a whole in this country are weak. In a booming economy, unions have power. In a recession, they give back benefits to save jobs.