OH, NOOOOS!..Even Joy Reid Skeptical of McClatchy Report on Michael Cohen's Cell Phone Near Prague

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
As I said previously the FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ can make anything electronically happen!!! A FAKE NEWS story so pathetically lame that even Trump hating Joy Reid won't buy into it.

For the past couple of years, Trump-Russia collusion has been the holy grail for liberals desperate to find a way to remove President Donald Trump from office. Unfortunately for them, any actual proof of such collusion has yet to emerge.

What gave them hope that finally, FINALLY proof had been produced demonstrating Trump-Russia collusion came in the form of a Thursday piece from McClatchy correspondents Peter Stone and Greg Gordon that signaled from Michael Cohen's cell phone had been detected near Prague in the summer of 2016 despite a denial by him.

This report gave great joy to liberals who have thus far been bereft of any actual collusion proof. Unfortunately for them, this "proof" quickly proved to be so third party lame that even resolutely anti-Trump lefty and MSNBC host Joy Reid was skeptical of it. However, first let us see the McClatchy report, "Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting," which gave no indication of just how incredibly weak it was:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
 
As I said previously the FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ can make anything electronically happen!!! A FAKE NEWS story so pathetically lame that even Trump hating Joy Reid won't buy into it.

For the past couple of years, Trump-Russia collusion has been the holy grail for liberals desperate to find a way to remove President Donald Trump from office. Unfortunately for them, any actual proof of such collusion has yet to emerge.

What gave them hope that finally, FINALLY proof had been produced demonstrating Trump-Russia collusion came in the form of a Thursday piece from McClatchy correspondents Peter Stone and Greg Gordon that signaled from Michael Cohen's cell phone had been detected near Prague in the summer of 2016 despite a denial by him.

This report gave great joy to liberals who have thus far been bereft of any actual collusion proof. Unfortunately for them, this "proof" quickly proved to be so third party lame that even resolutely anti-Trump lefty and MSNBC host Joy Reid was skeptical of it. However, first let us see the McClatchy report, "Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting," which gave no indication of just how incredibly weak it was:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


Yes...this story is another fake news story brought to us by left wing TDS sufferers..........hating Trump melts your brain...

Remember when the standard was at least two sources...and the reporter actually had to see the information before reporting on it....?

Michael Cohen Report Is Based On Third-Hand Information, Reporter Reveals

The reporters who broke a potentially bombshell story claiming evidence that Michael Cohen visited Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign did not see for themselves some of the underlying intelligence cited in their report, one of the journalists who wrote the story revealed Thursday.

In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016.

Gordon also suggested that the four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their articlealso did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the report is based on third-hand information.

“Is there anything that you were able to physically see for yourselves?” MSNBC host Joy Reid asked Gordon.

“I wish we had. We held out for a while for that, and it came a time when we thought we had a critical mass. It is a competitive business,” Gordon said.

“Some of the sources have government sources, and some of the sources are people who have told us that they have trusted intelligence-type sources that they get information from. We don’t know the specifics, but we have used these sources on many subjects, and they have been very accurate,” Gordon added.

When asked if he has seen the intercepts, Gordon responded, “No.”
 
Apparently the United States hating, leftist bedwetting progressives want nothing to do with this fake news story...

Fake-News-Trump-Ad.jpg
 
As I said previously the FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ can make anything electronically happen!!! A FAKE NEWS story so pathetically lame that even Trump hating Joy Reid won't buy into it.

For the past couple of years, Trump-Russia collusion has been the holy grail for liberals desperate to find a way to remove President Donald Trump from office. Unfortunately for them, any actual proof of such collusion has yet to emerge.

What gave them hope that finally, FINALLY proof had been produced demonstrating Trump-Russia collusion came in the form of a Thursday piece from McClatchy correspondents Peter Stone and Greg Gordon that signaled from Michael Cohen's cell phone had been detected near Prague in the summer of 2016 despite a denial by him.

This report gave great joy to liberals who have thus far been bereft of any actual collusion proof. Unfortunately for them, this "proof" quickly proved to be so third party lame that even resolutely anti-Trump lefty and MSNBC host Joy Reid was skeptical of it. However, first let us see the McClatchy report, "Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting," which gave no indication of just how incredibly weak it was:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Uhh... Hold on a sec, McClatchy isn't done with this.

Deranged: McClatchy Comes Up With New Fake News to Rescue Its Old Fake News

Months ago, McClatchy, citing anonymous sources (of course), claimed that Michael Cohen actually was in Prague -- they claimed that his cell phone hand pinged a tower in Prague.

Now, the Mueller report says (again) that Michael Cohen was never in Prague. Never.

But don't worry: McClatchy has an answer to that.

Sure, they now say, maybe Michael Cohen was not in Prague -- but what about his treasonous phone itself?

From McClatchy:

"The Mueller report states Mr. Cohen was not in Prague. It makes no statement on whether the investigation ever had evidence that Mr. Cohen's phone pinged in or near Prague, as McClatchy reported," said Kristin Roberts, McClatchy's East Region Editor.

McClatchy's Dec. 2018 reporting was based on information from five individuals with foreign intelligence connections, who all requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information shared and concerns about sources and methods. Each obtained their information independently from each other. McClatchy stands by the reporting.​

What a bunch!
 
Michael Cohen was never in Prague. His passport says he was never in Prague. There is no other evidence, hotel or credit card receipts that puts him in Prague. The phone is wrong or lied about.
 
Michael Cohen was never in Prague. His passport says he was never in Prague. There is no other evidence, hotel or credit card receipts that puts him in Prague. The phone is wrong or lied about.
They Were All Lying

Raul Ilargi Meijer

During and since the 2016 US presidential campaign, the media, both in the US and abroad, started making up accusations against Trump from scratch. This included the collusion with Russia accusation that led to the Mueller probe.

There was never any proof of the accusation, which is why the conclusion of the probe was No Collusion. The accusation was clear, and so was the conclusion.

US media published over half a million articles on the topic, and not one of them was based on any proof. If that proof had existed, Mueller would have found and used it.

Axios report[ed] that since May 2017, exactly 533,074 web articles have been published about Russia and Trump-Mueller, which in turn have generated “245 million interactions – including likes, comments and shares – on Twitter and Facebook.” “From January 20, 2017 (Inauguration Day) through March 21, 2019 (the last night before special counsel Robert Mueller sent his report to the attorney general), the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts produced a combined 2,284 minutes of ‘collusion’ coverage, most of it (1,909 minutes) following Mueller’s appointment on May 17, 2017,” MRC reports

What the Mueller report says is that 500,000 articles about collusion, and 245 million social media interactions in their wake, were written without any proof whatsoever (or Mueller would have used that proof). That doesn’t mean they may not have been true, or that they can’t be found to be true in the future, it means there was no proof when they were published. They Were All Lying.

The same goes for the Steele dossier. It holds zero proof of collusion between Trump’s team and Russia. Or Mueller would have used that proof. New York Times, Washington Post, Guardian, CNN: they all had zero proof when they published, not a thing. Or Mueller would have used that proof. Rachel Maddow’s near nightly collusion rants: no proof. Or Mueller would have used that proof.

That there is no proof also means there has never been any proof.
 

Forum List

Back
Top