Off-duty LAPD officer fatally shot while house-hunting with girlfriend

[M14 Shooter]

For the third time today, more guns gun nut.

Yes, yes, I know - you can't tell us how/why CA's draconian "common sense" gun laws did not prevent this.
We got it.
Thanks.

 

[Captain Caveman]

So... you can't tell us why insulting others makes you feel better.
This doesn't bother you?

You should know, I just do what you guys do.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Yes, yes, I know - you can't tell us how/why CA's draconian "common sense" gun laws did not prevent this.
We got it.
Thanks.

More guns needed.

 

[marvin martian]

Unfortunately, life doesn't work like that. Law abiding people can go un-law abiding. Criminals is a small statistic with the gun issue.

Sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

The shooting unfolded Monday evening in the 1700 block of East 87th Street in unincorporated Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, which is leading the investigation, said.

Los Angeles Police Department Chief Michel Moore told members of the Board of Police Commissioners Tuesday that Arroyos was killed during a gunfight with 3 men who tried to rob him.

The police officer had been looking at a home to buy with his girlfriend when the couple was approached by the alleged robbers, two of whom opened fire, detectives told NBC Los Angeles.

Arroyos told his girlfriend to run and exchanged gunfire with the suspects, but was struck, they said.

Moore told board members the officer had a "bright future" that was "taken away" in a street robbery.

Off-duty LAPD officer fatally shot while house-hunting with girlfriend, police say

Fernando Arroyos, 27, died Monday. Four people have been arrested, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said.

www.nbcnews.com

Like a lot of these stories, there's not a lot of details.

Is it better to give crooks your money or to try to shoot it out with them?

If you're using a gun for self-defense?

Even the worst shot can occasionally hit someone right between the eyes.

RIP

It's all situational. You have to think in tactical terms:

Nearest cover to me, nearest cover to them.

How many assailants?

Are they armed?

Do they look like they can handle themselves?

Sometimes the odds just are in your favor a giving them your billfold is the best bet.

If it looks like they're going to kill you anyway, then there is only one thing do.

Three armed robbers? I'm going to throw them my billfold at them and hopefully they leave.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Cos you guys need more guns so this incident wouldn't have happened

That's right. More armed citizens means these three goofballs might have been smoked a long time ago. But, instead, they meet little to no resistance and operate with near impunity.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

So, citizens should be disarmed and let the police protect them.

But police should just submit to the criminals....

At times, I don't think you fascists have our best interests in mind.....

Ya think?...lol

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

"More guns" is the answer from the gun nuts. They feel that to resolve the gun problem, you to increase the thing that's the problem.

If you're gonna use the word Nazi, at least insert a fucking brain so you know what you're on about, you fucking retard.

There is no "gun problem". We have a criminal problem. A problem that has been exacerbated by Left wing politicians and their stupid anti-cop policies.

 

[whitehall]

He wasn't shot while "house hunting". He was shot and killed in a robbery attempt. How does this incident qualify as a 2nd Amendment issue?

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

He wasn't shot while "house hunting". He was shot and killed in a robbery attempt. How does this incident qualify as a 2nd Amendment issue?

A robbery, while he was house hunting.

 

[bodecea]

LA (and all of California) is a lawless shithole because of people like you.

We know you couldn't make it in California....jelly.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

We know you couldn't make it in California....jelly.

Wouldn't wanna try...lol

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The off-duty cop wasn't unarmed. He took a risk, and it didn't pan out.

You could almost say that if he didn't have a gun, he'd be alive today, maybe $50 pooer.

It sure sounds like the trash opened fire first.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Unfortunately, life doesn't work like that. Law abiding people can go un-law abiding. Criminals is a small statistic with the gun issue.

Criminals are about ninety percent of the gun problem, most of the rest is suicide. Law abiding citizens are one or two percent. So criminals aren’t “a small statistic with the gun issue”

 

[M14 Shooter]

More guns needed.

There's no need for you to further surrender the point.
We got it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You should know, I just do what you guys do.

You still haven't answered the question:
Why does insulting people make you feel better?

 

[braalian]

Too bad there’s a moratorium on executions in California.

 

[theHawk]

ou could almost say that if he didn't have a gun, he'd be alive today, maybe $50 pooer.

Or he’d be dead anyway and his gf raped and/or murdered.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Murder during a robbery used to get you the death penalty.

Now, they'll all get bailed out by Kamala

 

[braalian]

Murder during a robbery used to get you the death penalty.

Now, they'll all get bailed out by Kamala

If you kill someone during a robbery, and it’s proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, you should be shot in the back of the head execution-style within hours of the guilty verdict. Serve as a deterrent to armed robbery plus save the taxpayers some money.

And if you commit armed robbery but don’t hurt anyone it should still be an automatic life sentence. Zero tolerance and the thugs will be too terrified to even attempt an armed robbery.