Occupiers Achieved Goals

[Uncensored2008]

Occupy has accomplished exactly nothing.

No policy changes.

No new laws.

No regulatory investigations.

Nada.

Zip.

Zilch.

Yeah, but the sales of soap have suffered tremendously!

 

[Nosmo King]

It must be wonderful to be so self assured that everything you believe is right. That there is nothing wrong with your policies. That everyone who questions or criticizes those immaculate polices is either stupid or criminal or both.

And what a disappointment it must be when those policies cause more harm than good. When those policies are dismissed as failures and the reason for hardship.

I sure hope the most self assure, and therefore the stupidest, among you are prepared for something other than a soft landing.

Please cite all the OWS policies that have not created violence or caused harm.

Which OWS policies have directly resulted in violence and bloodshed?

 

[saveliberty]

It must be wonderful to be so self assured that everything you believe is right. That there is nothing wrong with your policies. That everyone who questions or criticizes those immaculate polices is either stupid or criminal or both.

And what a disappointment it must be when those policies cause more harm than good. When those policies are dismissed as failures and the reason for hardship.

I sure hope the most self assure, and therefore the stupidest, among you are prepared for something other than a soft landing.

Please cite all the OWS policies that have not created violence or caused harm.

Which OWS policies have directly resulted in violence and bloodshed?

I admit it, it was a trick question. OWS has no policies. Yet, they still cause harm and bloodshed. In the end, that is what people will remember.

 

[Nosmo King]

Please cite all the OWS policies that have not created violence or caused harm.

Which OWS policies have directly resulted in violence and bloodshed?

I admit it, it was a trick question. OWS has no policies. Yet, they still cause harm and bloodshed. In the end, that is what people will remember.

The cops in Chicago in 1968 caused blood in the street too. Are they villified or venerated?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I love it when people show their true colors so clearly.

You shitters are not popular. The awareness you raised among Americans is that y'all are despicable scum.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Occupiers Achieved Goals

LOL!

"goals."

Hey, the Shitters had goals:

Get laid
Get fed
Get high

 

[The Rabbi]

Which OWS policies have directly resulted in violence and bloodshed?

I admit it, it was a trick question. OWS has no policies. Yet, they still cause harm and bloodshed. In the end, that is what people will remember.

The cops in Chicago in 1968 caused blood in the street too. Are they villified or venerated?

Vilified. Why do you ask?

 

[CaughtInTheMid]

if the only thing they did was raise awareness of the fact that Congress can inside trade and we go to jail for the same thing, then it was worth it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

More than a bit of a stretch there. Or, you anticipate "violence in the streets" and are making a pre=emptive swipe at the OWS folks, in spite of the facts.

I don't think there will be violence.

The Shitters aren't motivated enough to get violent.

 

[Nosmo King]

I admit it, it was a trick question. OWS has no policies. Yet, they still cause harm and bloodshed. In the end, that is what people will remember.

The cops in Chicago in 1968 caused blood in the street too. Are they villified or venerated?

Vilified. Why do you ask?

I am just looking for consistency. If blood is shed on the streets and the OWS is pre-emptively blmed for it, I wanted to know if all those who cause blood to be shed are similarly blamed.

 

[Uncensored2008]

They raised awareness of what it means to be over-privileged in our society: sit around all day fornicating and doing drugs.

Works for me.

We noticed.

Make sure to wear your name tag today, one more writeup and Micky D's is going to fire you....

 

[The Rabbi]

The cops in Chicago in 1968 caused blood in the street too. Are they villified or venerated?

Vilified. Why do you ask?

I am just looking for consistency. If blood is shed on the streets and the OWS is pre-emptively blmed for it, I wanted to know if all those who cause blood to be shed are similarly blamed.

Rioters in LA. Rioters in Detroit c.1969. Chicago police at the 1968 Dem convention, acting under Democratic Mayor Daley. Demonstrators at Kent State throwing stones at National Guardsmen.
Yup, Americans don't like fomenters of violence. OWS fits right in with that.

 

[Nosmo King]

Vilified. Why do you ask?

I am just looking for consistency. If blood is shed on the streets and the OWS is pre-emptively blmed for it, I wanted to know if all those who cause blood to be shed are similarly blamed.

Rioters in LA. Rioters in Detroit c.1969. Chicago police at the 1968 Dem convention, acting under Democratic Mayor Daley. Demonstrators at Kent State throwing stones at National Guardsmen.
Yup, Americans don't like fomenters of violence. OWS fits right in with that.

I wonder what the Los Angeles rioters were doing in Detroit? I wonder if the National Guardsmen who fired live ammunition at college students at Kent State were also held in contempt?

 

[Uncensored2008]

if the only thing they did was raise awareness of the fact that Congress can inside trade and we go to jail for the same thing, then it was worth it.

The Tea Party brought that up 4 years ago, the leftists defended the practice or ignored it.

 

[Nosmo King]

if the only thing they did was raise awareness of the fact that Congress can inside trade and we go to jail for the same thing, then it was worth it.

The Tea Party brought that up 4 years ago, the leftists defended the practice or ignored it.

There was no Tea Party in February 2008. They didn't come along until that Muslim/Marxist/Socialist/Kenyan-born/unAmerican radical was sworn in. At least they are consistent. They would never organize under a Republican administration, no matter how badly that administration fouled up.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There was no Tea Party in February 2008.

The Tea party began in 2006 as a reaction to the McCain - Bush amnesty plan.

They didn't come along until that Muslim/Marxist/Socialist/Kenyan-born/unAmerican radical was sworn in. At least they are consistent. They would never organize under a Republican administration, no matter how badly that administration fouled up.

You again prove, the lower the IQ, the further to the left.

 

[Nosmo King]

There was no Tea Party in February 2008.

The Tea party began in 2006 as a reaction to the McCain - Bush amnesty plan.

They didn't come along until that Muslim/Marxist/Socialist/Kenyan-born/unAmerican radical was sworn in. At least they are consistent. They would never organize under a Republican administration, no matter how badly that administration fouled up.

You again prove, the lower the IQ, the further to the left.

Tea Party Movement Birth History Future

History of the Tea Party Movement — Infoplease.com

The Tea Party National Resource Center - Learn About Us - History of The Tea Party - TheTeaParty.net

Tea Party movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Short History of the Tea Parties - By Jim Geraghty - The Campaign Spot - National Review Online

Never claim anything that can be this easily disproved. You are a grand idiot if you think (there's a stretch!) that such claims cannot be instantly debunked.

 

[CaughtInTheMid]

if the only thing they did was raise awareness of the fact that Congress can inside trade and we go to jail for the same thing, then it was worth it.

The Tea Party brought that up 4 years ago, the leftists defended the practice or ignored it.

actually, both sides have ignored it for decades.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Tea Party Movement Birth History Future

History of the Tea Party Movement — Infoplease.com

The Tea Party National Resource Center - Learn About Us - History of The Tea Party - TheTeaParty.net

Tea Party movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Short History of the Tea Parties - By Jim Geraghty - The Campaign Spot - National Review Online

Never claim anything that can be this easily disproved. You are a grand idiot if you think (there's a stretch!) that such claims cannot be instantly debunked.

Try again, Sparky.

From March of 2008.

See, I don't give a fuck about "TheTeaParty.net" or any of the other interlopers.

{TheTeaParty.net is a division of Stop This Insanity Inc. and is a national non-profit 501 (c)(4)} - from your link

Real Tea Parties started in '06 and had nothing to do with these groups - they were 100% grass roots.

 

[Uncensored2008]

actually, both sides have ignored it for decades.

That's very true. Both parties are full of crooks.