Obama White House did little to stop 'The Rise of ISIS despite warnings,' says Ambassador to Iraq.

Theowl32

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2013
22,718
16,942
2,415
President Obama’s former ambassador to Iraq says in a new interview that his administration “did almost nothing” in response to intelligence warnings earlier this year that Islamic State radicals were gaining ground in Iraq and threatening the country’s stability.
“The administration not only was warned by everybody back in January, it actually announced that it was going to intensify support against ISIS with the Iraqi armed forces. And it did almost nothing,” says James Jeffrey, who served as U.S. ambassador to Iraq between 2010 and 2012, in "Frontline's" "The Rise of ISIS," which airs on PBS Tuesday night (check local listings) and is previewed here exclusively on Yahoo News.

Jeffrey is one of a number of ex-administration officials who appear in the film and sharply criticize the decisions of the president they once served. Former U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta both take issue with Obama’s refusal to arm moderate rebels in Syria who — it is now argued — could have acted as a counterweight to the Islamic State (also called ISIS or ISIL).

“I think we made the wrong decision in not providing assistance to the rebels,” Panetta bluntly says at one point.

The film, reported by correspondent Martin Smith, offers a richly detailed account of how the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki alienated the country’s disenfranchised Sunni population, making reckless accusations of terrorism against Sunni leaders — including the country’s Vice Prime Minister Tariq al-Hashimi. Those allegations — flatly denied by al-Hashimi on camera — were based on the testimony of bodyguards who, it is strongly suggested, were tortured.

With little pressure or engagement from Washington, al-Maliki’s anti-Sunni agenda — driven by his “paranoia,” as one of Smith’s interlocutors says — paved the way for ISIS radicals to march through huge swaths of Iraqi territory this spring, seizing arsenals of U.S.-made weapons from a collapsing Iraqi army. This, of course, was the same army that the U.S. spent billions arming and training. In fact, terrorism expert Ken Katzman suggests in the film, they were a phantom led by do-nothing officers.

“They were people who were — they were fat cats, I call them,” Katzman, a Congressional Research Service terrorism analyst, says in the film. “They were people who were earning good money to basically sit at a desk and smoke cigarettes and drink good liquor all day.”

Obama White House did little to stop The Rise of ISIS says Frontline documentary - Yahoo News
------------------------------------------

Everything this piece of shit in chief has touched has turned to shit. Everything.

Can you believe the mess we are still dealing with as a result of Jimmy Carter's policies over 30 years ago?
 
Only way to have stopped it was war. And President Obama ran on getting us out of wars, not into new ones. There was no support for intervention AGAIN. Simple as that.
 
Only way to have stopped it was war. And President Obama ran on getting us out of wars, not into new ones. There was no support for intervention AGAIN. Simple as that.
Yet we are intervening in an inept way??!! This will not be fixed with air strikes.

Shouldn't be doing anything. It's a regional problem, let the region deal with it. If they don't, they'll loose and ISIS will take over. So what? If they're not willing to fight to keep what they have, why the hell should we fight for them?
 
Only way to have stopped it was war. And President Obama ran on getting us out of wars, not into new ones. There was no support for intervention AGAIN. Simple as that.
Yet we are intervening in an inept way??!! This will not be fixed with air strikes.

Shouldn't be doing anything. It's a regional problem, let the region deal with it. If they don't, they'll loose and ISIS will take over. So what? If they're not willing to fight to keep what they have, why the hell should we fight for them?
Its a global problem,not just a regional one,the world is a different place than 50 years ago.
 
Only way to have stopped it was war. And President Obama ran on getting us out of wars, not into new ones. There was no support for intervention AGAIN. Simple as that.
Yet we are intervening in an inept way??!! This will not be fixed with air strikes.

Shouldn't be doing anything. It's a regional problem, let the region deal with it. If they don't, they'll loose and ISIS will take over. So what? If they're not willing to fight to keep what they have, why the hell should we fight for them?
Its a global problem,not just a regional one,the world is a different place than 50 years ago.

ISIS isn't a global power with global reach. All they can is the very same thing any terror group can do, make videos and hope local actors do what they want. They don't have an air force or navy with which to project themselves. They're a ragtag army of people only into it for the plunder. They're pirates, nothing more serious than that. If the local nations had the will they could wiped out very quickly. They don't exhibit that will so they're getting take over, as well they should be.
 
Literal genocide and the liberals, who care so much for poor people, and they want to do nothing about it.

Liberals folks. Maybe someone can explain to me what these pieces of double talking shit stand for.
 
Only way to have stopped it was war. And President Obama ran on getting us out of wars, not into new ones. There was no support for intervention AGAIN. Simple as that.
Yet we are intervening in an inept way??!! This will not be fixed with air strikes.

Shouldn't be doing anything. It's a regional problem, let the region deal with it. If they don't, they'll loose and ISIS will take over. So what? If they're not willing to fight to keep what they have, why the hell should we fight for them?
Its a global problem,not just a regional one,the world is a different place than 50 years ago.

ISIS isn't a global power with global reach. All they can is the very same thing any terror group can do, make videos and hope local actors do what they want. They don't have an air force or navy with which to project themselves. They're a ragtag army of people only into it for the plunder. They're pirates, nothing more serious than that. If the local nations had the will they could wiped out very quickly. They don't exhibit that will so they're getting take over, as well they should be.
Ya ok so you think they should be over run by some real bad people,because they can't beat them without help?? Cancer will grow until it infects the whole body
 
Literal genocide and the liberals, who care so much for poor people, and they want to do nothing about it.

Liberals folks. Maybe someone can explain to me what these pieces of double talking shit stand for.

First you explain why you're in favor of helping the poor in Iraq, but not here?
 
Literal genocide and the liberals, who care so much for poor people, and they want to do nothing about it.

Liberals folks. Maybe someone can explain to me what these pieces of double talking shit stand for.

First you explain why you're in favor of helping the poor in Iraq, but not here?

Explain "help" you socialist pig. You compare people being exterminated to individuals who have every opportunity to make it but in most cases CHOOSE not to?

The only thing the poor in this country means to democrats are votes for free rations. Just enough to shut them up but never enough to make a difference.

You stupid asshole.
 
Thankfully we didn't listen to Clinton's chief of staff who became the CIA Director under Obama. Our troops would have been fighting, being maimed and dying to support the corrupt and criminal Maliki government as the Shiite Army committed all those atrocities on the Sunni population. The last thing we needed were troops in Iraq while all that crap was going on. Our response teams and troops are right were they are supposed to be, on the Kuwait border, ready to respond when we decide, not when Iraq decides.
 
First you explain why you're in favor of helping the poor in Iraq, but not here?

Explain "help" you socialist pig. You compare people being exterminated to individuals who have every opportunity to make it but in most cases CHOOSE not to?

The only thing the poor in this country means to democrats are votes for free rations. Just enough to shut them up but never enough to make a difference.

You stupid asshole.

Seems like I've hit a nerve with pottymouth! Is it because Iraqis are almost white, but so many of the American poor aren't? Only his conscience will know for sure, but it's definitely something to consider when dealing with the ODS sufferers.
 
President Obama’s former ambassador to Iraq says in a new interview that his administration “did almost nothing” in response to intelligence warnings earlier this year that Islamic State radicals were gaining ground in Iraq and threatening the country’s stability.
“The administration not only was warned by everybody back in January, it actually announced that it was going to intensify support against ISIS with the Iraqi armed forces. And it did almost nothing,” says James Jeffrey, who served as U.S. ambassador to Iraq between 2010 and 2012, in "Frontline's" "The Rise of ISIS," which airs on PBS Tuesday night (check local listings) and is previewed here exclusively on Yahoo News.

Jeffrey is one of a number of ex-administration officials who appear in the film and sharply criticize the decisions of the president they once served. Former U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta both take issue with Obama’s refusal to arm moderate rebels in Syria who — it is now argued — could have acted as a counterweight to the Islamic State (also called ISIS or ISIL).

“I think we made the wrong decision in not providing assistance to the rebels,” Panetta bluntly says at one point.

The film, reported by correspondent Martin Smith, offers a richly detailed account of how the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki alienated the country’s disenfranchised Sunni population, making reckless accusations of terrorism against Sunni leaders — including the country’s Vice Prime Minister Tariq al-Hashimi. Those allegations — flatly denied by al-Hashimi on camera — were based on the testimony of bodyguards who, it is strongly suggested, were tortured.

With little pressure or engagement from Washington, al-Maliki’s anti-Sunni agenda — driven by his “paranoia,” as one of Smith’s interlocutors says — paved the way for ISIS radicals to march through huge swaths of Iraqi territory this spring, seizing arsenals of U.S.-made weapons from a collapsing Iraqi army. This, of course, was the same army that the U.S. spent billions arming and training. In fact, terrorism expert Ken Katzman suggests in the film, they were a phantom led by do-nothing officers.

“They were people who were — they were fat cats, I call them,” Katzman, a Congressional Research Service terrorism analyst, says in the film. “They were people who were earning good money to basically sit at a desk and smoke cigarettes and drink good liquor all day.”

Obama White House did little to stop The Rise of ISIS says Frontline documentary - Yahoo News
------------------------------------------

Everything this piece of shit in chief has touched has turned to shit. Everything.

Can you believe the mess we are still dealing with as a result of Jimmy Carter's policies over 30 years ago?
Guess what, moron. Israel is God's chosen. Period. You & your kind will fall
President Obama’s former ambassador to Iraq says in a new interview that his administration “did almost nothing” in response to intelligence warnings earlier this year that Islamic State radicals were gaining ground in Iraq and threatening the country’s stability.
“The administration not only was warned by everybody back in January, it actually announced that it was going to intensify support against ISIS with the Iraqi armed forces. And it did almost nothing,” says James Jeffrey, who served as U.S. ambassador to Iraq between 2010 and 2012, in "Frontline's" "The Rise of ISIS," which airs on PBS Tuesday night (check local listings) and is previewed here exclusively on Yahoo News.

Jeffrey is one of a number of ex-administration officials who appear in the film and sharply criticize the decisions of the president they once served. Former U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta both take issue with Obama’s refusal to arm moderate rebels in Syria who — it is now argued — could have acted as a counterweight to the Islamic State (also called ISIS or ISIL).

“I think we made the wrong decision in not providing assistance to the rebels,” Panetta bluntly says at one point.

The film, reported by correspondent Martin Smith, offers a richly detailed account of how the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki alienated the country’s disenfranchised Sunni population, making reckless accusations of terrorism against Sunni leaders — including the country’s Vice Prime Minister Tariq al-Hashimi. Those allegations — flatly denied by al-Hashimi on camera — were based on the testimony of bodyguards who, it is strongly suggested, were tortured.

With little pressure or engagement from Washington, al-Maliki’s anti-Sunni agenda — driven by his “paranoia,” as one of Smith’s interlocutors says — paved the way for ISIS radicals to march through huge swaths of Iraqi territory this spring, seizing arsenals of U.S.-made weapons from a collapsing Iraqi army. This, of course, was the same army that the U.S. spent billions arming and training. In fact, terrorism expert Ken Katzman suggests in the film, they were a phantom led by do-nothing officers.

“They were people who were — they were fat cats, I call them,” Katzman, a Congressional Research Service terrorism analyst, says in the film. “They were people who were earning good money to basically sit at a desk and smoke cigarettes and drink good liquor all day.”

Obama White House did little to stop The Rise of ISIS says Frontline documentary - Yahoo News
------------------------------------------

Everything this piece of shit in chief has touched has turned to shit. Everything.

Can you believe the mess we are still dealing with as a result of Jimmy Carter's policies over 30 years ago?
 
The Iraqi's wanted to run their country without the US military and failed, yet Oblama is to blame?

He's to blame for giving open support to the movement during the Arab Spring and openly trying to get US involvement in their attempts to take down Assad. He's to blame for doing nothing when an ambassador was killed by that same movement and then doing nothing at all when ISIS was in the earliest stages. He's to blame for sitting on his hands until ISIS had overrun half of Iraq and was on the outskirts of Baghdad. He's to blame for not supporting the Kurds in Iraq, who are more than willing to fight ISIS, because he's afraid of offending the Turks.
 
Maobama does NOT care what happens to America. Brains-for-mush morons will never admit this. They are caught up in the hype, which is fed by the lamestream media, whose job it is to cover his back. His handlers(Soros, etc.) may have have told him him to just make sure they get their money via the "green" companies who took OUR money & went belly up & the stock market QE. He was put there by opportunists who pull the strings.
 
Maobama does NOT care what happens to America. Brains-for-mush morons will never admit this. They are caught up in the hype, which is fed by the lamestream media, whose job it is to cover his back. His handlers(Soros, etc.) may have have told him him to just make sure they get their money via the "green" companies who took OUR money & went belly up & the stock market QE. He was put there by opportunists who pull the strings.
Is that you Rush?
 

Forum List

Back
Top