Obama had us at near world peace. Trump taking us to war ..

[Ringel05]

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

60 years of world leaders have given lip service to the so called NK problem, no one really want's it "solved" China and the US like it there as a buffer, South Korea doesn't want to absorb the north, the economic issues could prove disastrous and NK likes to rattle sabers so everyone else comes to the extortion table to pay them to be quiet. That's the reality.

All the more reason, NOT to push Trump to solve it NOW.

Trump won't solve it either, he'll bluster but probably do nothing else. One reason NK has been so active lately is we stopped paying extortion moneys to them under Bush II and passed it off to the Asian nations to address. Also China is starting to get tired of NK's bluster and saber rattling and is hitting NK with sanctions in a hope to shut them up for now but NK knows of no other way to raise more money so they continue making noise in hopes we'll start paying them extortion money again.

 

[Correll]

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

60 years of world leaders have given lip service to the so called NK problem, no one really want's it "solved" China and the US like it there as a buffer, South Korea doesn't want to absorb the north, the economic issues could prove disastrous and NK likes to rattle sabers so everyone else comes to the extortion table to pay them to be quiet. That's the reality.

All the more reason, NOT to push Trump to solve it NOW.

Trump won't solve it either, he'll bluster but probably do nothing else. One reason NK has been so active lately is we stopped paying extortion moneys to them under Bush II and passed it off to the Asian nations to address. Also China is starting to get tired of NK's bluster and saber rattling and is hitting NK with sanctions in a hope to shut them up for now but NK knows of no other way to raise more money so they continue making noise in hopes we'll start paying them extortion money again.

I hope you are correct.

 

[Ringel05]

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

60 years of world leaders have given lip service to the so called NK problem, no one really want's it "solved" China and the US like it there as a buffer, South Korea doesn't want to absorb the north, the economic issues could prove disastrous and NK likes to rattle sabers so everyone else comes to the extortion table to pay them to be quiet. That's the reality.

All the more reason, NOT to push Trump to solve it NOW.

Trump won't solve it either, he'll bluster but probably do nothing else. One reason NK has been so active lately is we stopped paying extortion moneys to them under Bush II and passed it off to the Asian nations to address. Also China is starting to get tired of NK's bluster and saber rattling and is hitting NK with sanctions in a hope to shut them up for now but NK knows of no other way to raise more money so they continue making noise in hopes we'll start paying them extortion money again.

I hope you are correct.

Oh I'm correct it's just that NK may get desperate and not go along, then there could be real problems.

 

[Correll]

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.


If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

60 years of world leaders have given lip service to the so called NK problem, no one really want's it "solved" China and the US like it there as a buffer, South Korea doesn't want to absorb the north, the economic issues could prove disastrous and NK likes to rattle sabers so everyone else comes to the extortion table to pay them to be quiet. That's the reality.

All the more reason, NOT to push Trump to solve it NOW.

Trump won't solve it either, he'll bluster but probably do nothing else. One reason NK has been so active lately is we stopped paying extortion moneys to them under Bush II and passed it off to the Asian nations to address. Also China is starting to get tired of NK's bluster and saber rattling and is hitting NK with sanctions in a hope to shut them up for now but NK knows of no other way to raise more money so they continue making noise in hopes we'll start paying them extortion money again.

I hope you are correct.

Oh I'm correct it's just that NK may get desperate and not go along, then there could be real problems.

Or Trump could try to solve it, by pressuring China and then North Korea, which is where things could go sideways very easily.


Which is why I support nonintervention.

 

[Ringel05]

60 years of world leaders have given lip service to the so called NK problem, no one really want's it "solved" China and the US like it there as a buffer, South Korea doesn't want to absorb the north, the economic issues could prove disastrous and NK likes to rattle sabers so everyone else comes to the extortion table to pay them to be quiet. That's the reality.

All the more reason, NOT to push Trump to solve it NOW.

Trump won't solve it either, he'll bluster but probably do nothing else. One reason NK has been so active lately is we stopped paying extortion moneys to them under Bush II and passed it off to the Asian nations to address. Also China is starting to get tired of NK's bluster and saber rattling and is hitting NK with sanctions in a hope to shut them up for now but NK knows of no other way to raise more money so they continue making noise in hopes we'll start paying them extortion money again.

I hope you are correct.

Oh I'm correct it's just that NK may get desperate and not go along, then there could be real problems.

Or Trump could try to solve it, by pressuring China and then North Korea, which is where things could go sideways very easily.


Which is why I support nonintervention.

Our "intervention" is basically political feel good for the base as it was under almost every president we've had. One of the few things I'll give Bush II is getting us out of direct extortion negotiations with North Korea, he took massive Dem flack for that move. Politics as usual.

 

[charwin95]

What do you want? Sounds like y'all are screeching for war with Syria, Yemen, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea? All at the same time. Is that what y'all really want? Seems pretty deranged. Maybe you should rethink things a bit.

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

Incorrect my friend. The pressure was created by fat boy launching test after test------- NK problem is not that simple to solve unless we go to a war. The same with h Syria.
So ----------- for you to blame people like me to deflect Trump incompetency is totally inaccurate.

 

[Correll]

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

Incorrect my friend. The pressure was created by fat boy launching test after test------- NK problem is not that simple to solve unless we go to a war. The same with h Syria.
So ----------- for you to blame people like me to deflect Trump incompetency is totally inaccurate.

A minute ago you claimed to believe that Trump reacted to the "loudest" political pressure.

Now you deny that there IS political pressure from domestic voices, at all.


Liberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.


Also, your little word games will be of great benefit to the dead and dying in Seoul, if it comes to that, you warmonger.

 

[Dschrute3]

You know, there are several things about Trump that bother me.

When Syria used chemical weapons, he didn't take out the runway, nor did he bomb the bunkers where they had the weapons.

Now? It's coming to light that the "armada" that Trump promised to send over isn't even there right now, one of the carriers was going in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

And this morning, it's been reported that Russia has flown bombers TWICE close to Alaska airspace. You know, the Tupelovs that are the Russian equivalent of our B52's?

Nope, his weak responses thus far are only encouraging other nations to see how far they can push us.

And, Tillerson said just this afternoon that if Iran continues on it's current course, they are going to be walking down the same path as N. Korea.

Yep, war is on the horizon, I can feel it.

What do you want? Sounds like y'all are screeching for war with Syria, Yemen, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea? All at the same time. Is that what y'all really want? Seems pretty deranged. Maybe you should rethink things a bit.

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

 

[sakinago]

As obama left the office in his wake was about as much world peace as we have seen maybe ever . Think about it. Sure their are some mostly civil war hot spots in the Mideast and parts of Africa , but overall there's no active warring countries .

Conservatives and Trump hate that . Their war machine masters do not approve . Just a few months in, they are already on the warpath .

A vote for the GOP is a vote for war .

Delete your account.

 

[Correll]

What do you want? Sounds like y'all are screeching for war with Syria, Yemen, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea? All at the same time. Is that what y'all really want? Seems pretty deranged. Maybe you should rethink things a bit.

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

 

[2aguy]

As obama left the office in his wake was about as much world peace as we have seen maybe ever . Think about it. Sure their are some mostly civil war hot spots in the Mideast and parts of Africa , but overall there's no active warring countries .

Conservatives and Trump hate that . Their war machine masters do not approve . Just a few months in, they are already on the warpath .

A vote for the GOP is a vote for war .

Wow....you started drinking again? obama has created the most unstable world imaginable.....

 

[yiostheoy]

Trump lied about the carrier attack group.

They are still not even close to N.Korea.

They were heading in the opposite direction for shore leave in the USA.

It should be a calm weekend.

Trump stirred up all the angst for nothing.

it was a bluff.

 

[Dschrute3]

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Yeah, i've asked rabid Trump-Haters several times where they stand on North Korea. They still refuse to give an honest direct answer. All they know, is that they really really hate Donald Trump. They're consumed with irrational hate. It's what 'Party before Country' does to folks. It's why i'm neither a Democrat or Republican. Being an Independent is the way to go. It helps keeps you more rational and logical.

 

[charwin95]

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.

The last 60 years worth of world leaders have failed to solve the North Korea issue.

As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

If the pressure was removed, from people like you, we would be very far from a war. YOu yourself just stated that Trump responds to the "loudest".

And you have lent your voice to the chorus for war. SO that you can make political hay. At potentially the cost of millions of lives....



What if the American people raised their voice(s) for non-intervention? Would that be so bad?

Incorrect my friend. The pressure was created by fat boy launching test after test------- NK problem is not that simple to solve unless we go to a war. The same with h Syria.
So ----------- for you to blame people like me to deflect Trump incompetency is totally inaccurate.

A minute ago you claimed to believe that Trump reacted to the "loudest" political pressure.

Now you deny that there IS political pressure from domestic voices, at all.


Liberals: All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.


Also, your little word games will be of great benefit to the dead and dying in Seoul, if it comes to that, you warmonger.

Wrong again. Keep trying.

 

[charwin95]

They constantly attack him for inaction, creating pressure for action.


If he acts, they attack him for that.


They constantly claim that they believe him to be incompetent.


But if he is incompetent why do they push him to tackle incredibly difficult situations that could easily blow up into bloodbaths?

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Wrong again-------I do care and I pray to god we don't go to war. There are more of these so called fake conservative like you who are pushing for war than liberals.
During campaign it was repeatedly mentioned ------------- that your god will bring us to a war. We are very close to reality bc of your god. So why are you deflecting and try to blame us?

 

[charwin95]

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Yeah, i've asked rabid Trump-Haters several times where they stand on North Korea. They still refuse to give an honest direct answer. All they know, is that they really really hate Donald Trump. They're consumed with irrational hate. It's what 'Party before Country' does to folks. It's why i'm neither a Democrat or Republican. Being an Independent is the way to go. It helps keeps you more rational and logical.

People hate Trump because of Trump ----- He did that to himself. So tell me -------- What is there to like about Trump?
About NorthKorea------ Trump haters gave you an honest answer but you just didn't like it. If America goes to war Americans will support Trump that includes me.
HOWEVER ---- HOWEVER ------ You don't expect people like me to just quietly don't say anything----- That we are at peace right NOW then we are now in the brink of war because of Trump.----------- Explain that.

 

[Dschrute3]

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Yeah, i've asked rabid Trump-Haters several times where they stand on North Korea. They still refuse to give an honest direct answer. All they know, is that they really really hate Donald Trump. They're consumed with irrational hate. It's what 'Party before Country' does to folks. It's why i'm neither a Democrat or Republican. Being an Independent is the way to go. It helps keeps you more rational and logical.

People hate Trump because of Trump ----- He did that to himself. So tell me -------- What is there to like about Trump?
About NorthKorea------ Trump haters gave you an honest answer but you just didn't like it. If America goes to war Americans will support Trump that includes me.
HOWEVER ---- HOWEVER ------ You don't expect people like me to just quietly don't say anything----- That we are at peace right NOW then we are now in the brink of war because of Trump.----------- Explain that.

So, what do you propose Trump do about the North Korea problem? I get it that you hate him, but what's your solution to the problem? I'm pretty open-minded, i'm willing to listen. The floor is all yours.

 

[charwin95]

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Yeah, i've asked rabid Trump-Haters several times where they stand on North Korea. They still refuse to give an honest direct answer. All they know, is that they really really hate Donald Trump. They're consumed with irrational hate. It's what 'Party before Country' does to folks. It's why i'm neither a Democrat or Republican. Being an Independent is the way to go. It helps keeps you more rational and logical.

People hate Trump because of Trump ----- He did that to himself. So tell me -------- What is there to like about Trump?
About NorthKorea------ Trump haters gave you an honest answer but you just didn't like it. If America goes to war Americans will support Trump that includes me.
HOWEVER ---- HOWEVER ------ You don't expect people like me to just quietly don't say anything----- That we are at peace right NOW then we are now in the brink of war because of Trump.----------- Explain that.

So, what do you propose Trump do about the North Korea problem? I get it that you hate him, but what's your solution to the problem? I'm pretty open-minded, i'm willing to listen. The floor is all yours.

Negotiate negotiate negotiate and stop threatening people. Stop this chess pounding ego and low popularity boasting. Just like what you keep posting over and over against bombing Syria.
Why not try to negotiate first with h North K. -------- If that fails then considers other options. NOT threatening then negotiate.

BTW -------- You didn't answer any of my questions. Why is that?

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

"World peace" is an odd term for Obama's 8 years of bombing and drone striking Muslims.

 

[Correll]

H should know how to balance it--------- since he is incompetent--------- he chooses whoever is making the loud noise. Maybe he should resign.

SO, you view him as incompetent, and believe that he is going to react to whomever is making the most noise.


So, do you thus, lend your voice to those how are pushing for non-intervention, or do you support those who are making political hay by slamming him for inaction?

Do you want to drive the man you consider incompetent to take more aggressive action in dealing with the hair trigger nuclear booby trap that is North Korea?

A disciplined politician should have that quality of leadership but not a populist real state tycoon.
People been warned about incompetency.
As far as driving him to take aggressive action. ------- this was all discussed during the campaign of what we expected from Trump --------- We are very close to a war.

Well, do you want war with North Korea or not? You can't criticize him for inaction, and also criticize him for taking action. So which is it? You can't have it both ways.

War, not War, millions alive, millions dead,

HE DOESN'T CARE.

All he care about is undermining his political enemies.


The results, the potential deaths of millions, mean nothing to him. NOTHING.

Wrong again-------I do care and I pray to god we don't go to war. There are more of these so called fake conservative like you who are pushing for war than liberals.
During campaign it was repeatedly mentioned ------------- that your god will bring us to a war. We are very close to reality bc of your god. So why are you deflecting and try to blame us?

Not sure why you call me a "Fake conservative". Lord knows you are NOT the person to make such a call.


And your side was spewing nothing but crap for nearly the whole of the campaign. YOu demonstrated over and over again that you had no respect for your words, so why should anyone else?


Also, the "god" thing, you are projecting.


Trump is a politician who spoke out in favor of policies that I have long supported, so I supported him.


Your attempt to act as though it is anything more than that, is just you being a jerk.


This thread, this site is full of lefties attacking Trump for INACTION, or ineffective action.


That is creating pressure for War.