Obama GDP suckiest ever!!!

[rightwinger]

Deflection noted.

How does that qualify as a deflection?

It's not and he/she/it knows it. He/she/it just can't counter you.

Right. Would you like to coment Obama's most anemic of all time first quarter GDP numbers? Didn't think so. Bye bye.

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

 

[Rocko]

Did he talk about the first quarter GDP under Obama?

Slightly negative GDP under horrible weather conditions qualifies as "the worst ever"?

Hyperbole?

Ok so now you're denying that he has on average the lowest fist quarter GDP growth out of any US president. We moved on from deflection to straight denial.

What does the lowest average first quarter growth mean to Americans outside of gross cherry picking stats?

So you're saying it doesn't mean anything that under Obama we have had the most anemic fist quarter average GDP ever?

Seems about right unless you can explain why it would be significant

Bwhahahaha haha haha haha hahaha

You can't be serious. You want me to explain to you why first quarter GDP is a relevant indicator. Ha most economists believe GDP to be the best indicator of wealth and measurement of GDP for a quarter of the year isn't what anyone would call useless data.

 

[rightwinger]

Slightly negative GDP under horrible weather conditions qualifies as "the worst ever"?

Hyperbole?

Ok so now you're denying that he has on average the lowest fist quarter GDP growth out of any US president. We moved on from deflection to straight denial.

What does the lowest average first quarter growth mean to Americans outside of gross cherry picking stats?

So you're saying it doesn't mean anything that under Obama we have had the most anemic fist quarter average GDP ever?

Seems about right unless you can explain why it would be significant

Bwhahahaha haha haha haha hahaha

You can't be serious. You want me to explain to you why first quarter GDP is a relevant indicator. Ha most economists believe GDP to be the best indicator of wealth and measurement of GDP for a quarter of the year isn't what anyone would call useless data.

Bwahahaha....still looking for you to explain why first quarter is of any economic significance

If you can't, I will gladly explain Obamas first quarter statistics for you

 

[Rocko]

How does that qualify as a deflection?

It's not and he/she/it knows it. He/she/it just can't counter you.

Right. Would you like to coment Obama's most anemic of all time first quarter GDP numbers? Didn't think so. Bye bye.

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

Well if it makes you feel any beet his overall number suck too.

The first doesn't matter is what you're saying? Are you retarded? Of course his overall numbers matter more, but it doesn't mean his first quarter numbers dont matter, they are showing part of the picture.

 

[Rocko]

Ok so now you're denying that he has on average the lowest fist quarter GDP growth out of any US president. We moved on from deflection to straight denial.

What does the lowest average first quarter growth mean to Americans outside of gross cherry picking stats?

So you're saying it doesn't mean anything that under Obama we have had the most anemic fist quarter average GDP ever?

Seems about right unless you can explain why it would be significant

Bwhahahaha haha haha haha hahaha

You can't be serious. You want me to explain to you why first quarter GDP is a relevant indicator. Ha most economists believe GDP to be the best indicator of wealth and measurement of GDP for a quarter of the year isn't what anyone would call useless data.

Bwahahaha....still looking for you to explain why first quarter is of any economic significance

If you can't, I will gladly explain Obamas first quarter statistics for you

Ok so now you're denying that he has on average the lowest fist quarter GDP growth out of any US president. We moved on from deflection to straight denial.

What does the lowest average first quarter growth mean to Americans outside of gross cherry picking stats?

So you're saying it doesn't mean anything that under Obama we have had the most anemic fist quarter average GDP ever?

Seems about right unless you can explain why it would be significant

Bwhahahaha haha haha haha hahaha

You can't be serious. You want me to explain to you why first quarter GDP is a relevant indicator. Ha most economists believe GDP to be the best indicator of wealth and measurement of GDP for a quarter of the year isn't what anyone would call useless data.

Bwahahaha....still looking for you to explain why first quarter is of any economic significance

If you can't, I will gladly explain Obamas first quarter statistics for you

I don't understand what you're trying to have me explain. If we can agree that GDP is a relevant indicator, which I think we're in agreement, then how can you say a quarter of the year's GDP is irrelevant?

 

[rightwinger]

It's not and he/she/it knows it. He/she/it just can't counter you.

Right. Would you like to coment Obama's most anemic of all time first quarter GDP numbers? Didn't think so. Bye bye.

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

Well if it makes you feel any beet his overall number suck too.

The first doesn't matter is what you're saying? Are you retarded? Of course his overall numbers matter more, but it doesn't mean his first quarter numbers dont matter, they are showing part of the picture.

Why are Obamas first quarter numbers so bad?

Because in a sample of only six first quarters, when the very first first quarter when you take office in January 2009 is a negative seven, it is difficult to have an overall high average

But you figured that into your cherry picked calculation didn't you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Not losing 745,000 jobs a month like we did during Gomer`s last 5 months is a good thing. Ya think? Ever? Should the DOW lose 10,000 points Monday it will still be higher than when the "failed" presidency of Obama began.

Deflection noted.

How does that qualify as a deflection?

It was 7 years ago. The banks are all healthy and have been for half a decade.

 

[Rocko]

OK RW I'll dumb it down for you. Obama's

Right. Would you like to coment Obama's most anemic of all time first quarter GDP numbers? Didn't think so. Bye bye.

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

Well if it makes you feel any beet his overall number suck too.

The first doesn't matter is what you're saying? Are you retarded? Of course his overall numbers matter more, but it doesn't mean his first quarter numbers dont matter, they are showing part of the picture.

Why are Obamas first quarter numbers so bad?

Because in a sample of only six first quarters, when the very first first quarter when you take office in January 2009 is a negative seven, it is difficult to have an overall high average

But you figured that into your cherry picked calculation didn't you?

You fail. So basically you'rer saying it's the January 09 outlier? Other presidents have had worse first quarters. And stronger the recession, stronger the recovery. Not under obama.

 

[rightwinger]

OK RW I'll dumb it down for you. Obama's

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

Well if it makes you feel any beet his overall number suck too.

The first doesn't matter is what you're saying? Are you retarded? Of course his overall numbers matter more, but it doesn't mean his first quarter numbers dont matter, they are showing part of the picture.

Why are Obamas first quarter numbers so bad?

Because in a sample of only six first quarters, when the very first first quarter when you take office in January 2009 is a negative seven, it is difficult to have an overall high average

But you figured that into your cherry picked calculation didn't you?

You fail. So basically you'rer saying it's the January 09 outlier? Other presidents have had worse first quarters. And stronger the recession, stronger the recovery. Not under obama.

Now that we are cherry picking GDP data, let's look at fourth quarter

Now we get to add in a negative nine in fourth quarter of 2008. Adding a negative nine to Bushs fourth quarters shows Obama had a much stronger fourth quarter average than Bush did

Thus making Bush the worst President ever

 

[Stephanie]

Obama paid goons running rampant. first thing they do is throw up Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh
losers and pathetic all rolled into one

 

[rightwinger]

Obama paid goons running rampant. first thing they do is throw up Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh
losers and pathetic all rolled into one

More diarrhea from Stephanie

 

[Rozman]

Bad first quarter GDP numbers mean nothing if the President is a Democrat......
Bad first quarter GDP numbers if it was a Republican President.....

That's called the topic for the MSNBC evening lineup and Chuck Todd's Meet the Press on Sunday.

 

[rightwinger]

Bad first quarter GDP numbers mean nothing if the President is a Democrat......
Bad first quarter GDP numbers if it was a Republican President.....

That's called the topic for the MSNBC evening lineup and Chuck Todd's Meet the Press on Sunday.

When has any sane person of either party ever shown concern of an average first quarter GDP ?

 

[skookerasbil]

And on top of it......more gheyness........under Obama, not only are the rich getting richer, they are getting richer faster!!!

http://www.newsweek.com/two-numbers-rich-are-getting-richer-faster-224535

ghey


plus, as the OP brilliantly pointed out on the GDP >>>


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/man_pointing_ahead_1823502_1.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Add this in too.......the Attorney Generals office under Obama has effectively transformed ALL of the American police force >>>>


[URL='http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/img_1812.jpg.html'][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Obama even cooks the unemployment #'s >>>

Jack Welch Unemployment rate cooked - Oct. 5 2012


more ghey

 

[Stephanie]

Obama even cooks the unemployment #'s >>>

Jack Welch Unemployment rate cooked - Oct. 5 2012


more ghey

of course it's cooked and the majority of the people knows it. that was only ONE of the reasons they kicked democrats out of congress. another is they were TIRED of Obama LYING to them and acting like a thug while doing it

 

[jknowgood]

As bad as Booooosh was he still had stronger first quarter GDP numbers than Obama, but than again so did every other president.

Why do you expect sense from liberals if they had any brains they wouldn't be liberals.

Then why don't you righties have a viable candidate to run against Hillary?

Oh, that's right. You're banking on the Koch brothers' $890,000,000 cash infusion into the race. Sorry, forgot.

Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par With Both Parties’ Spending
"The spending goal, revealed Monday at the Kochs’ annual winter donor retreat near Palm Springs, Calif., would allow their political organization to operate at the same financial scale as the Democratic and Republican Parties...."



So you righties are all waiting for the other Big Brother(s) to bail you out. Funny.

I wouldn't brag on the hag. That's all you got, I feel sorry for you.

 

[jknowgood]

How does that qualify as a deflection?

It's not and he/she/it knows it. He/she/it just can't counter you.

Right. Would you like to coment Obama's most anemic of all time first quarter GDP numbers? Didn't think so. Bye bye.

You just want to sweep the last six years under the rug and cherry pick. Why don't you dial up Bush's 1st Quarter 2009?

Umm you're an idiot, but we all knew that. We're not talking about one specific quarter, Bush had much better overall GDP numbers than Obama, and Obama has on average the worst first quarter GDP figures out of any president. If you're going to call first quarter GDP cherry-picking, than that's a pretty big piece of data youre calling cherry-picked data.

What is the significance of first quarter numbers vs overall economic performance?

Why should anyone be concerned about first quarter numbers?

How about most people on welfare in Obama's economy?