Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Going the way of Benjamin Harrison would suffice.
Two terms, and a long lifetime as the Grand Old Man of the Democratic Party. Now won't that frost your little agates?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Going the way of Benjamin Harrison would suffice.
I'm no legal expert, j, put you don't need a PhD in US History either to put two and two together here.
Funny how that works, YOU always know what is, but the rest of us are wrong when we use the same line of reasoning on things the Democrats do. Go figure.
Stupid ass. Nobody I have seen has stated in any way that they wished Bush to die. Just to stand before a judge and jury for his crimes.
But movies about assassinating Mr Bush were just A-OK.
Never saw it, and assisinating a President is not something to be taken lightly.
But movies about assassinating Mr Bush were just A-OK.
Never saw it, and assisinating a President is not something to be taken lightly.
and they have a video game or two also.
Never saw it, and assisinating a President is not something to be taken lightly.
and they have a video game or two also.
Link?
"Elchert tells The Associated Press that the newspaper's advertising staff didn't make the historical connection."
I'm not sure if i should cry or laugh over that one. Aren't journalist supposed to know basic history like that?
You may want to actually check out the forums this was already posted and discussed.
By the way, point out exactly where he said to assassinate the President.
If the left can play stupid on things inferred then they do not get to dictate what other things inferred mean either. Pretty simple concept.
You may want to actually check out the forums this was already posted and discussed.
Handled.
By the way, point out exactly where he said to assassinate the President.
If the left can play stupid on things inferred then they do not get to dictate what other things inferred mean either. Pretty simple concept.
Seriously RGS, like I said earlier in this thread one doesn't need to have a doctorate in US History to put two and two together and figure out what the ad is saying.
You may want to actually check out the forums this was already posted and discussed.
Handled.
By the way, point out exactly where he said to assassinate the President.
If the left can play stupid on things inferred then they do not get to dictate what other things inferred mean either. Pretty simple concept.
Seriously RGS, like I said earlier in this thread one doesn't need to have a doctorate in US History to put two and two together and figure out what the ad is saying.
Really? Sorry if I don't budge but you dumb asses have said for 8 years that things you inferred did not really mean what we all knew they meant when caught at it. You are even now claiming that a certain Judge simply did not mean what she obviously said as well.
I will admit this ad may suggest what you claim as soon as You, Jillian and the rest of the left side agree that what a certain Judge said means she is a racist and not afraid to admit it.
Handled.
Seriously RGS, like I said earlier in this thread one doesn't need to have a doctorate in US History to put two and two together and figure out what the ad is saying.
Really? Sorry if I don't budge but you dumb asses have said for 8 years that things you inferred did not really mean what we all knew they meant when caught at it. You are even now claiming that a certain Judge simply did not mean what she obviously said as well.
Again from earlier in the thread ... I don't know what any of this stuff from the Bush years that you choose to project onto me has to do with this very specific incident. Why do you constantly knee jerk about Boooooooosh? What's your deal?
I will admit this ad may suggest what you claim as soon as You, Jillian and the rest of the left side agree that what a certain Judge said means she is a racist and not afraid to admit it.
lol ...
That you are willing to "make a deal" about it says all that I really need to know ... that you know full well what that ad is saying.
Really? Sorry if I don't budge but you dumb asses have said for 8 years that things you inferred did not really mean what we all knew they meant when caught at it. You are even now claiming that a certain Judge simply did not mean what she obviously said as well.
Again from earlier in the thread ... I don't know what any of this stuff from the Bush years that you choose to project onto me has to do with this very specific incident. Why do you constantly knee jerk about Boooooooosh? What's your deal?
I will admit this ad may suggest what you claim as soon as You, Jillian and the rest of the left side agree that what a certain Judge said means she is a racist and not afraid to admit it.
lol ...
That you are willing to "make a deal" about it says all that I really need to know ... that you know full well what that ad is saying.
Once again for the terminally stupid and slow. What you INFER means nothing since you claim when ever the left infers something it didn't really.
Proven by your ignorant claim that the Judge in question isn't a racist, when she made such a racist comment and belongs to a racist organization.
Remind us how if a WHITE Organization was named "the RACE" and had as its planks all the things her group has as theirs, just for whites not Hispanics, You would not call them what they would be, RACISTS.
ROFL... If he had just run that ad for President Bush... He'd be on Letterman and "The View" within 24 hours...
Again from earlier in the thread ... I don't know what any of this stuff from the Bush years that you choose to project onto me has to do with this very specific incident. Why do you constantly knee jerk about Boooooooosh? What's your deal?
lol ...
That you are willing to "make a deal" about it says all that I really need to know ... that you know full well what that ad is saying.
Once again for the terminally stupid and slow. What you INFER means nothing since you claim when ever the left infers something it didn't really.
What are you talking about?
Proven by your ignorant claim that the Judge in question isn't a racist, when she made such a racist comment and belongs to a racist organization.
What are you talking about? I've made one comment on the court nominee and it was something along the lines of "damn that's whack" when commenting on her ruling about a student that couldn't run for class office. Other than that I, as in me Article 15 and not imaginary liberals whose words you seem to believe I have to own and defend, said.
Remind us how if a WHITE Organization was named "the RACE" and had as its planks all the things her group has as theirs, just for whites not Hispanics, You would not call them what they would be, RACISTS.
Again, what are you talking about?
Seriously, man, this is a thread about a very pointed ad that called for or at the least hoped for President Obama to be assassinated. It makes no sense for you to bring up a bunch of completely irrelevent shit into this thread. None.
A classified ad which ran yesterday in a Pennsylvania newspaper - which appears to call for the assassination for President Obama - was pulled today.
The ad, which ran in the classified section of The Warren Times Observer, connects Mr. Obama, the first African-American president, with four previous presidents who have been assassinated and reads, May Obama follow in the steps of Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy!"
Local Classified Ad Yanked After Calling for Obama Assassination - Political Punch
Link to the ad here.
What an idiot. I'm certain this won't end with the newspaper simply pulling the ad. This guy just made himself a person of interest. Placing an ad isn't a completely anonymous way to go.
I'm amazed that these extremists get away with making such vicious comments about the president these days anyway. Talkshow hosts are some of the biggest culprits.
Why did they even print it?
Why did they even print it?
I was going to ask that too. Doesn't the newspaper have an ad editor? If not, then people could put in ads wanting to sell or buy children and such.
I was going to ask that too. Doesn't the newspaper have an ad editor? If not, then people could put in ads wanting to sell or buy children and such.
a newspaper actually checking facts?