Obama as Rebuttal to Marx

[PoliticalChic]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]




So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. While none of information in the OP is disputable, one might be prompted to ask how so very many have been manipulated into accepting collectivism over individualism, communism over Americanism, and Hegel and Marx over Jefferson and Madison.

Well…no point in sugar-coating it: while government schooling and the media play a prominent role in the indoctrination, the sloth and cowardice of those who don't question nor read are major factors.




5. The technique used by America's version of Stalin and Hitler is not death, it is taxation and regulation.
This technique has the added improvement of making the elites wealthy as well as powerful.


And we find this telltale fact in Obama's upbringing:

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
… Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. … “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income…"
Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK


a. Obama admits it here:
But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.” The Education of President Obama




With every vote, Democrats lend their support to taxation and regulation…..i.e., handing control of their lives to government.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. It's difficult to understand sentient human beings behaving more like iron filings in a magnetic field, than Democrat voters who shout 'Yes Sir!' to every mandate of government, every confiscation via taxation and regulation.


Of course, this is a theme among Liberals/Democrats, as seen under the very same Democrat who authorized concentration camps:

The huge tax burden necessary to provide the entitlements and fund federal welfare programs can be laid at the feet of the New Deal.

Before 1940, only 5% of Americans paid any income tax, and the maximum was 25%. By the end of WWII, 2/3 of American families paid income tax- and it started at 24%, with a $500 exemption.
It went up to 94% over $200k. So, if one earned $300k, one kept only $6000 of the last $100k.


a. "Hillsdale College economics historian and professor Burt Folsom, author of "New Deal or Raw Deal?", notes that in 1941, Roosevelt even proposed a 99.5 percent marginal tax rate on all incomes more than $100,000. When a top adviser questioned the idea, Roosevelt replied, "Why not?" Ominous Parallels


b. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of Democrat A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor:

“[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism



The "government" is another name for "the collective."
As a result of taxation and excessive regulation, no individual can lay claim to owning anything.

 

[Skylar]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

 

[francoHFW]

Whatever FDR did to Japanese Americans was nothing compared to what the GOP would have done... Many thanks to the GOP for starting that Great Depression which gave rise to militarists and Chaos around the world... Much like the mess we're in now. Their greed and Corruption cost the US 8 trillion dollars this time, ditto Europe and the rest of the modern world, and absolutely wrecked the economy of Africa and the Middle East and Venezuela....

 

[Syriusly]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]




So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You could have save yourself a lot of time and effort by just typing:

Obama is a Fucking Commie

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

You should know that by now.

The Litmus Test is really very simple....so simple that even a government school grad like you should be able to understand it.


In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one must subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


None of these pass that test:
Communism
Socialism
modern Liberalism
Fascism
Progressivism
Nazism




You should take notes on this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Whatever FDR did to Japanese Americans was nothing compared to what the GOP would have done... Many thanks to the GOP for starting that Great Depression which gave rise to militarists and Chaos around the world... Much like the mess we're in now. Their greed and Corruption cost the US 8 trillion dollars this time, ditto Europe and the rest of the modern world, and absolutely wrecked the economy of Africa and the Middle East and Venezuela....

1. "Whatever FDR did to Japanese Americans was nothing compared to what the GOP would have done... "

Seems this dunce has relied on the Magic 8-Ball for his education.


BTW....
2. Roosevelt took a recession and expanded it into a decade long Depression.


3. For comparison:

a. While "The Depression" is probably the only economic downturn ever studied in government schools, few ever speak of any depressions or recessions prior to the "Great Depression."

Know how many there were?

Over thirty. And the average length was a year or so.

List of recessions in the United States - List of recessions in the United States - Wikipedia


b. "The Great Depression (1929-39) was the deepest and longest-lasting economic downturn in the history of the Western industrialized world. In the United States, ..."The Great Depression - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com


4. Know why FDR did this?
Because he wanted to....so he could eviscerate the Constitution.

This totalitarian dreamed of swimming with the other sharks....Mussolini, Hitler, and his BFF, Stalin.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]




So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

View attachment 171130

Having included not a single word, this becomes your most insightful post ever.

Keep it up!

 

[PoliticalChic]

You could have save yourself a lot of time and effort by just typing:

Obama is a Fucking Commie

1. No one ever tells me how to educate the Left.

2. You could have left out the vulgarity and appeared more of an adult.

 

[Skylar]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

And, for folks like you, they still put instructions on shampoo bottles.

2."Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism."

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

I see that three items is far too many for you to grasp.

But I did suggest that you take notes.

3. "No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama."

I have to admit that it is my guilty pleasure to make half-heads, you, jump through hoops.....

...all I need do is publish the truth about Hussein.


I'm gonna post another fact about him....explaining the title that brought you slithering over here.....

.....you'll be back.

 

[Skylar]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

You making up imaginary definitions is neither 'truth' nor 'accuracy'. But imagination. The reason you keep trying to convince both us and yourself that your imagination must be real.....is that neither you nor we are buying it

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Totalitarianism is total control. Its right there in the name. You've made up your own definition where totalitarianism is virtually all forms of government.

Sorry, PC. But almost no government on earth is totalitarian. Here in the US, we've never had a totalitarian government. We've never had a dictator. Your imagination is giving you a uselessly skewed perspective on this.

And you're still running from this simple question: Do you object to public education and child labor laws? Both are, by your own definition, totalitarian. Yet you refuse to object to either.

Smiling.....if even *you* are going to ignore your made up definitions, surely you'll understand why we don't have much use for them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Obama's reign in America is, in one way at least, a dramatic reversal of one of Marx's basic tenets.

I'll get to that…..



2. But first, the context:

While there are myriad comparisons able to be made between Liberalism and its totalitarian cousins, there are actually some….significant…. differences.
The most obvious is the wholesale slaughter of its citizens.

Repressed, yes, marginalizes and discriminated against, but none of the annihilation the world has witnessed under the Bolsheviks and the Nazis.
This doesn't mean that the thought to do so in no present in American totalitarians….but there are conditions that, up to now, work to block same:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Jonah Goldberg



a. Hold on, you say…..the icon of Liberals/Democrats penned up American citizens in concentration camps…..
True. But I did say there are ' there are myriad comparisons.'



3. The most basic requirement for liberty is the right to private property ownership. The Founders knew that: they had studied John Locke. But the followers of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx had very different views to impose on the less astute in America.
You might take a look at this:
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

a. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

b. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

c. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

The Democrats are right there with Marx:
a. "Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

b. ....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University

c. President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”





So far, we've seen only the similarities and consubstantiations of Obamaunism and communism.

A big difference….
…coming up.

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

You making up imaginary definitions is neither 'truth' nor 'accuracy'. But imagination. The reason you keep trying to convince both us and yourself that your imagination must be real.....is that neither you nor we are buying it



2."Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism."

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

"Totalitarianism is total control. Its right there in the name. You've made up your own definition where totalitarianism is virtually all forms of government.

Sorry, PC. But almost government on earth is totalitarian. Here in the US, we've never had a totalitarian government. We've never had a dictator. Your imagination is giving you a uselessly skewed perspective on this."



I told you you'd be back.


1. Here, from a book you haven't read:

In Thoreau’s On the duty of Civil Disobedience, he states:
“ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all of its own power and authority are derived.”



Let's compare that to your sort:

2. The devotees of totalitarianism, where government and the collective is more important than any human, any individual, accept genocide as government policy in support of doctrine.....communist, fascist, Nazi, and socialism.


3. As Liberals and Progressives have the same view vis-a-vis the collective, it follows that they are the same as any other totalitarian view qualitatively, if not quantitatively.

4. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).

5. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future."
Folsom and Folsom, "FDR Goes To War."



Just between us, don't you wish you had an actual education, and could produce a cogent argument on these sorts of topics....

...you know, unlike you 'is not, issssssss nooottttttt!!!' sort of argument?


You'll be back.

 

[Skylar]

Yeah, totalitarianism doesn't mean what you think it means. As Obama wasn't a totalitarian. Nor has any president been, ever. Nor is taxing capital gains 'communism'.

And riddle me this: Are you against public education and child labor laws? Because they're part of the Communist Manifesto's 10 planks too. Either you have to reject both.....or acknowledge that you too 'just choose from what works'.

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

You making up imaginary definitions is neither 'truth' nor 'accuracy'. But imagination. The reason you keep trying to convince both us and yourself that your imagination must be real.....is that neither you nor we are buying it



2."Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism."

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

"Totalitarianism is total control. Its right there in the name. You've made up your own definition where totalitarianism is virtually all forms of government.

Sorry, PC. But almost government on earth is totalitarian. Here in the US, we've never had a totalitarian government. We've never had a dictator. Your imagination is giving you a uselessly skewed perspective on this."



I told you you'd be back.


1. Here, from a book you haven't read:

In Thoreau’s On the duty of Civil Disobedience, he states:
“ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all of its own power and authority are derived.”



Let's compare that you your sort:

2. The devotees of totalitarianism, where government and the collective is more important than any human, any individual, accept genocide as government policy in support of doctrine.....communist, fascist, Nazi, and socialism.


3. As Liberals and Progressives have the same view vis-a-vis the collective, it follows that they are the same as any other totalitarian view qualitatively, if not quantitatively.

4. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).

5. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future."
Folsom and Folsom, "FDR Goes To War."



Just between us, don't you wish you had an actual education, and could produce a cogent argument on these sorts of topics....

...you know, unlike you 'is not, issssssss nooottttttt!!!' sort of argument?


You'll be back.

And you just blinked. You've gone into full spamming mode. Its what you do when you're painted yourself into a corner.

Nothing you've posted rebuts these two simple truthes:

1) Totalitarianism is total control and dictatorship.

2) We've never had totalitarianism nor dictatorship in this country. Ever.

Even you don't buy your made up definition of totalitarianism. As by your own standards both public education and child labor laws are totalitarian. But you refuse to denounce either.

If even you don't believe you, why would we?

 

[PoliticalChic]

As always, everything I post is 100% accurate, true and correct.

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

In order not to be a totalitarian, a collectivist, one mus subscribe to the principles that motivated our Founders:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

You making up imaginary definitions is neither 'truth' nor 'accuracy'. But imagination. The reason you keep trying to convince both us and yourself that your imagination must be real.....is that neither you nor we are buying it



2."Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism."

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

"Totalitarianism is total control. Its right there in the name. You've made up your own definition where totalitarianism is virtually all forms of government.

Sorry, PC. But almost government on earth is totalitarian. Here in the US, we've never had a totalitarian government. We've never had a dictator. Your imagination is giving you a uselessly skewed perspective on this."



I told you you'd be back.


1. Here, from a book you haven't read:

In Thoreau’s On the duty of Civil Disobedience, he states:
“ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all of its own power and authority are derived.”



Let's compare that you your sort:

2. The devotees of totalitarianism, where government and the collective is more important than any human, any individual, accept genocide as government policy in support of doctrine.....communist, fascist, Nazi, and socialism.


3. As Liberals and Progressives have the same view vis-a-vis the collective, it follows that they are the same as any other totalitarian view qualitatively, if not quantitatively.

4. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).

5. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future."
Folsom and Folsom, "FDR Goes To War."



Just between us, don't you wish you had an actual education, and could produce a cogent argument on these sorts of topics....

...you know, unlike you 'is not, issssssss nooottttttt!!!' sort of argument?


You'll be back.

And you just blinked. You've gone into full spamming mode. Its what you do when you're painted yourself into a corner.

Nothing you've posted rebuts these two simple truthes:

1) Totalitarianism is total control and dictatorship.

2) We've never had totalitarianism nor dictatorship in this country. Ever.

Even you don't buy your made up definition of totalitarianism. As by your own standards both public education and child labor laws are totalitarian. But you refuse to denounce either.

If even you don't believe you, why would we?

Gee...you're back....what a shock.

You've been exposed as ignorant, and, just as on the playground, when you were shunned by the other kids, you stuck around just to show 'em.

Now that you've shown you're a moron.....what's your next trick?

You certainly can't name any books you've read on the topic at issue.

 

[Skylar]

If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it. I'm not sure if you're trying to convince me or yourself at this point. As neither of us appear to be buying what you're trying to sell.

Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism.

No president has ever had that level of control, been a dictator or a totalitarian. Including Obama.

So.....you never did tell us: are you anti-child labor laws and against public education? Because both are planks in the Communist Manifesto. Either you must denounce both.....or admit that you too 'just choose from what works'.

Or you can keep running. Either serves my purposes.

1. "If that were true, you wouldn't have to keep saying it."
Did you notice that people still say 'water is wet.'

You making up imaginary definitions is neither 'truth' nor 'accuracy'. But imagination. The reason you keep trying to convince both us and yourself that your imagination must be real.....is that neither you nor we are buying it



2."Nope. Totalitarianism is specific; total control and dictatorship. Anything that fails to meet that standard fails to be totalitarianism."

Gads, you're stupid.
This is the test for Americanism:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

"Totalitarianism is total control. Its right there in the name. You've made up your own definition where totalitarianism is virtually all forms of government.

Sorry, PC. But almost government on earth is totalitarian. Here in the US, we've never had a totalitarian government. We've never had a dictator. Your imagination is giving you a uselessly skewed perspective on this."



I told you you'd be back.


1. Here, from a book you haven't read:

In Thoreau’s On the duty of Civil Disobedience, he states:
“ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all of its own power and authority are derived.”



Let's compare that you your sort:

2. The devotees of totalitarianism, where government and the collective is more important than any human, any individual, accept genocide as government policy in support of doctrine.....communist, fascist, Nazi, and socialism.


3. As Liberals and Progressives have the same view vis-a-vis the collective, it follows that they are the same as any other totalitarian view qualitatively, if not quantitatively.

4. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).

5. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future."
Folsom and Folsom, "FDR Goes To War."



Just between us, don't you wish you had an actual education, and could produce a cogent argument on these sorts of topics....

...you know, unlike you 'is not, issssssss nooottttttt!!!' sort of argument?


You'll be back.

And you just blinked. You've gone into full spamming mode. Its what you do when you're painted yourself into a corner.

Nothing you've posted rebuts these two simple truthes:

1) Totalitarianism is total control and dictatorship.

2) We've never had totalitarianism nor dictatorship in this country. Ever.

Even you don't buy your made up definition of totalitarianism. As by your own standards both public education and child labor laws are totalitarian. But you refuse to denounce either.

If even you don't believe you, why would we?

Gee...you're back....what a shock.

You've been exposed as ignorant, and, just as on the playground, when you were shunned by the other kids, you stuck around just to show 'em.

Now that you've shown you're a moron.....what's your next trick?

You certainly can't name any books you've read on the topic at issue.

I've been exposed as someone who realizes two simple truths that you simply can't rebut:

1) Totalitarianism is total control and dictatorship.

2) We've never had totalitarianism or dictatorship in this country. Ever.

You know your 're-imagining' of totalitarianism is nonsense. As when asked to apply it, you run. Both child labor laws and public education are totalitarianism by your made up definition. Yet you'll renounce neither.

Thank you for demonstrating how little regard you have for your own argument.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Now…that title…"Obama as rebuttal to Marx."


In one way, he was.

While, in his views about government and the electorate, Obama was far closer to Karl Marx than to Thomas Jefferson.



And, he benefited from the fact that Americans tend to judge others as being just like themselves, not assigning ulterior motives, being trusting and nonjudgmental….well, American elected officials benefit from this “naïveté."

Joe Biden made the point: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
And that's how Americans saw Obama.
None of which had to do with his statist views.



Here is where Obama's time on the scene runs counter to Marxian theory.
"It was a tenet of Marxism…that 'personality' remained an 'insignificant trifle' (in Lenin's phrase) when set against the master forces of history."
Martin Amis, "Koba The Dread," p. 181.

Yet, with Obama, an abject failure in both domestic and foreign policy.....it was all personality!!
He never did anything prior to the presidency, and failed totally in that capacity.



8. Ironic that:

a. While Marxist in principles, Obama thrived via a cult of personality, certainly not by accomplishments.

and

b. He loved using the phrase 'wrong side of history,' while the march of history as support for communism was the view of Marx himself.

"Speaking more broadly about the then still young “Arab Spring” he said, “I think that the region will be watching carefully to make sure we’re on the right side of history.” When Vladimir Putin started carving up Ukraine, the president insisted that America wouldn’t actually do anything about it, but fear not -- because Putin is on the wrong side of history.The “long moral arc of the universe” -- another of Obama’s favorite phrases -- will “bend toward justice.”
Are You on the Wrong Side of History?



"It’s a phrase Obama loves: He’s used it 15 times, in debates; at synagogues; in weekly radio addresses; at fundraisers. Obama is almost as fond of its converse, “the wrong side of history,” which he has used 13 times; staffers and press secretaries have invoked it a further 16." The Wrong Side of 'the Right Side of History'



Barack Obama...and his supporters.....On The Wrong Side of Competence.

 

[Skylar]

7. Now…that title…"Obama as rebuttal to Marx."


In one way, he was.

While, in his views about government and the electorate, Obama was far closer to Karl Marx than to Thomas Jefferson.



And, he benefited from the fact that Americans tend to judge others as being just like themselves, not assigning ulterior motives, being trusting and nonjudgmental….well, American elected officials benefit from this “naïveté."

Joe Biden made the point: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
And that's how Americans saw Obama.
None of which had to do with his statist views.



Here is where Obama's time on the scene runs counter to Marxian theory.
"It was a tenet of Marxism…that 'personality' remained an 'insignificant trifle' (in Lenin's phrase) when set against the master forces of history."
Martin Amis, "Koba The Dread," p. 181.

Yet, with Obama, an abject failure in both domestic and foreign policy.....it was all personality!!
He never did anything prior to the presidency, and failed totally in that capacity.



8. Ironic that:

a. While Marxist in principles, Obama thrived via a cult of personality, certainly not by accomplishments.

and

b. He loved using the phrase 'wrong side of history,' while the march of history as support for communism was the view of Marx himself.

"Speaking more broadly about the then still young “Arab Spring” he said, “I think that the region will be watching carefully to make sure we’re on the right side of history.” When Vladimir Putin started carving up Ukraine, the president insisted that America wouldn’t actually do anything about it, but fear not -- because Putin is on the wrong side of history.The “long moral arc of the universe” -- another of Obama’s favorite phrases -- will “bend toward justice.”
Are You on the Wrong Side of History?



"It’s a phrase Obama loves: He’s used it 15 times, in debates; at synagogues; in weekly radio addresses; at fundraisers. Obama is almost as fond of its converse, “the wrong side of history,” which he has used 13 times; staffers and press secretaries have invoked it a further 16." The Wrong Side of 'the Right Side of History'



Barack Obama...and his supporters.....On The Wrong Side of Competence.

And none of that has a thing to do with the core failures of your nonsense arguments:

1) Totalitarianism is still total control and dictatorship.

2) We've still never had totalitarianism nor dictatorship in this country. Ever.

You're stuck, PC. Though I knew that the minute you started to spam. Even you won't apply your imaginary definitions. As when asked to renounce both public education and child labor laws (which by your imagination, are both totalitarian), you flee.

If even you have no use for your imaginary definitions, surely you'll understand we don't either.