Obama Akbar! (It's the economy stupid)

[Truthmatters]

From 2000 to 2006 OHIOS FORECLOSURES DOUBLED

 

[Truthmatters]

3 MILLION FACTORY JOBS WERE LOST FROM 2000 TO 2006.

The left was warning this was unsustainable and you fools called us names.

Look how it turned out.

 

[The Rabbi]

From 2000 to 2006 OHIOS FORECLOSURES DOUBLED

Must suck to live in Ohio.
Was there a point to that comment?
Wasn't Taft the governor during that time? Wasn't he criticised for raising taxes and growing government, kind of like Obama is now?

 

[Truthmatters]

Your a partisan hack

 

[The Rabbi]

Your a partisan hack

You've been shown to be wrong a dozen times.
Your arguments are silly and off-topic and don't support your contention.
You continue to spout the same nonsense.
And I'm the partisan hack?? No, I don't think so.

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/forecast_2006_11.pdf

Only in your warped mind have I been proven to be wrong a dozen times.

 

[Truthmatters]

The center for economic development and policy was warning about it before hand.

You juist live in a pretend world where only what you want to think is true.

 

[Truthmatters]

The economy was NOT fine in before the dems took office.

 

[The Rabbi]

The economy was NOT fine in before the dems took office.

Repeating the same lie doesn't make it true. By any metric the economy was doing well prior to the Dums taking control of Congress.
Of course, if it really was that bad, why didnt they DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT???

You are hoist on your own petard. Pwnd, s0n.

 

[Truthmatters]

Why are you so fact adverse?

 

[The Rabbi]

Why are you so fact adverse?

You've been pwned, s0n. Your facts don't add up. And if they do add up then you are still wrong because your side caused the mess.
It's a lose-lose for you.

 

[Truthmatters]

File:Change in US household wealth 1946-2007.gif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Truthmatters]

Why are you so fact adverse?

You've been pwned, s0n. Your facts don't add up. And if they do add up then you are still wrong because your side caused the mess.
It's a lose-lose for you.

All bullshit and not facts.

I have presented facts and you have insulted in return.

 

[Alpha1]

File:Change in US household wealth 1946-2007.gif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why are you so fact adverse?

You've been pwned, s0n. Your facts don't add up. And if they do add up then you are still wrong because your side caused the mess.
It's a lose-lose for you.

All bullshit and not facts.

I have presented facts and you have insulted in return.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Change_in_US_household_wealth_1946-2007.gif

Its your link....

So whats your point....2001 Bush took office
so 2001 to 2007...(7 years) the change in household income increased 34.5%
and you know what unemployment was....
so ,,, your point must be, Bush presided over a wonderful economy until the Dems took over Congress....% change from 2006 to 2007 was -4.32% and then in 2008 the shit really hit the fan....
thanks to Barney Frank and his ilk....

 

[SFC Ollie]

Factory jobs: 3 million lost since 2000 - USATODAY.com

Yet the unemployment remained around or lower than 5% all those years, until after the democrats took over congress again.....


Democrats controlled both houses of congress in the following congresses:

79th
81st
82nd
84th through 96th
100th
101st
102nd
103rd
110th and
111th

Republicans controlled both houses of congress:

80th
104th
105th
106th
108th and 109th


WOW 17 to 6 yet the Republicans fucked up the country????? The numbers speak differently.

And that is of course simply since 1945, and there were 5 whole times where the house and senate were split.

Party divisions of United States Congresses - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And? i just gave a break down of that. Did you have a question?

 

[Truthmatters]

I gave proof and you left out the splits in the house and senate.

Republicans have held the presidency for far more of those years and small majorities can in no way trump a presidential veto.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I gave proof and you left out the splits in the house and senate.

Republicans have held the presidency for far more of those years and small majorities can in no way trump a presidential veto.

I did not leave out the splits I mentioned that there were 5 of them since 1945. And the president still doesn't control the wallet. Though the Republicans did have the White House just over half the time since 45.

The Democrats have controlled the wallet for the vast majority of our history since WW2. There is no denying this. Well there is but that's still the truth.

 

[The Rabbi]

I gave proof and you left out the splits in the house and senate.

Republicans have held the presidency for far more of those years and small majorities can in no way trump a presidential veto.

Ok so it goes like this:
TM: See what a mess the GOP made of things!
Us: But things were fine when the GOP was in control
TM: No! Look at how bad it was.
US: That was once the Dems took power in Congress
TM: The Dems had no power.

So why did they campaign to retake Congress?
You are a big loser. And a sore one at that.

 

[Truthmatters]

Lying some more there rabbi

 

[The Rabbi]

Lying some more there rabbi

Can you even recognize truth anymore? You have been pwned, s0n. That's the truth. Every which way your argument leads shows you are wrong. Can't be any plainer than that.