EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 76,759
- 52,924
- 2,645
He broke policy and killed no one.Irrelevant. Try to focus. The cop broke policy and killed a man.I didn't realize negroes had the right to resist arrest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He broke policy and killed no one.Irrelevant. Try to focus. The cop broke policy and killed a man.I didn't realize negroes had the right to resist arrest.
The morbidly obese with diabetes have heart attacks and die all the time.Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
Live updates: NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo fired - CNN
Not surprising, since the Judge reviewing the case recommended it, and the current Police Chief is nothing more than a DiBlasio shill.
Needless to say the PBA isn't happy about this:
What split second decision did he have to make? The cop wasn't being assaulted, he didn't have to make a split second decision as to whether "the object in Garner's hand was a weapon or a cell phone".If I break a policy at work I'm likely going to get fired. If I break a policy at work and someone dies, you can bet I am going to get fired.
I have no idea why some hold a police officer to a different standard. Just do what you are instructed and no one gets fired.
There is a serious question as to if he intended to apply a chokehold, or was just wrestling with a very large, resisting man, along with other officers.
The Admin Judge called it a chokehold, but many disagree.
Many disagree with a judge's ruling in many cases. Does that matter?
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is a serious question as to if he intended to apply a chokehold, or was just wrestling with a very large, resisting man, along with other officers.
The Admin Judge called it a chokehold, but many disagree.
Many disagree with a judge's ruling in many cases. Does that matter?
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
He was breaking the law that democrats passed.... that is normally a death sentence around the world.
He was breaking no law. He had broke the law in the past.
Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
Live updates: NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo fired - CNN
Not surprising, since the Judge reviewing the case recommended it, and the current Police Chief is nothing more than a DiBlasio shill.
Needless to say the PBA isn't happy about this:
He subdued him with a chokehold in violation of department policy. The firing was justified and should have happened a while ago.
What split second decision did he have to make? The cop wasn't being assaulted, he didn't have to make a split second decision as to whether "the object in Garner's hand was a weapon or a cell phone".There is a serious question as to if he intended to apply a chokehold, or was just wrestling with a very large, resisting man, along with other officers.
The Admin Judge called it a chokehold, but many disagree.
Many disagree with a judge's ruling in many cases. Does that matter?
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're just parrotting the inane bullshit people use to justify the police unnecessarily taking the life of another. For an act for which the punishment is most definitely not death.
Many disagree with a judge's ruling in many cases. Does that matter?
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
What drugs are you on. They had every right to touch him. He resisted and they tried to subdue him and he fought them. Don’t talk about things you don’t know. I’m a retired police officer and 2 of my nephews are on NYPD. His firing was all political. He didn’t do anything wrong and was found innocent. Don’t talk about what you don’t know. When you walk in there shoes then you can pass judgment. Until then shut the fuck up
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
He was breaking the law that democrats passed.... that is normally a death sentence around the world.
He was breaking no law. He had broke the law in the past.
Time to take your head out of your ass. Moron.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What split second decision did he have to make? The cop wasn't being assaulted, he didn't have to make a split second decision as to whether "the object in Garner's hand was a weapon or a cell phone".Many disagree with a judge's ruling in many cases. Does that matter?
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're just parrotting the inane bullshit people use to justify the police unnecessarily taking the life of another. For an act for which the punishment is most definitely not death.
He was resisting arrest and fighting back against the cops. They had too subdue him. Until you walk in our shoes just shut the fuck up because you sound like every typical asshole who runs there mouth thinking they know the system. TV isn’t like the real world
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
There was no death penalty except what he brought upon himself by resisting arrest.
If Gardner has simply placed his hands behind his back to be handcuffed when he was arrested, would anything have happened to him? Would he still be alive if he complied with the officer's instructions?
He committed suicide by cop.
It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
What drugs are you on. They had every right to touch him. He resisted and they tried to subdue him and he fought them. Don’t talk about things you don’t know. I’m a retired police officer and 2 of my nephews are on NYPD. His firing was all political. He didn’t do anything wrong and was found innocent. Don’t talk about what you don’t know. When you walk in there shoes then you can pass judgment. Until then shut the fuck up
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had no justification in touching him. He was simply standing on a sidewalk.
We are finally getting somewhere with dealing with police officers that don't understand that they can't do whatever they want.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had NO reason to even touch him.
He was breaking the law that democrats passed.... that is normally a death sentence around the world.
He was breaking no law. He had broke the law in the past.
Time to take your head out of your ass. Moron.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you can't counter the point, call people names.
Bravo.
What split second decision did he have to make? The cop wasn't being assaulted, he didn't have to make a split second decision as to whether "the object in Garner's hand was a weapon or a cell phone".It matters in this case because you are arguing he should have been fired.
Based upon court findings. I hold the officer to the same standard I would have been held to.
Don’t. Your not a cop and you have never been in the situation. He did his job and got screwed for it. It was a political statement. Cops have to make split second decisions. They don’t have the luxury of being able to think about it. The guy kept resisting and they were trying to subdue him. Sad that he died but it’s not the cops fault. Your just a Monday morning quarterback Until you walk in the shoes and do the job your opinion is shit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're just parrotting the inane bullshit people use to justify the police unnecessarily taking the life of another. For an act for which the punishment is most definitely not death.
He was resisting arrest and fighting back against the cops. They had too subdue him. Until you walk in our shoes just shut the fuck up because you sound like every typical asshole who runs there mouth thinking they know the system. TV isn’t like the real world
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
$8 million because they violated his civil rights. Keep your hands to yourself.
Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
There was no death penalty except what he brought upon himself by resisting arrest.
If Gardner has simply placed his hands behind his back to be handcuffed when he was arrested, would anything have happened to him? Would he still be alive if he complied with the officer's instructions?
He committed suicide by cop.
Arrested for what? And then to save time, resisting to what?
Can't answer my question huh?Since when is death the penalty for resisting arrest?The policeman was not prosecuted
He was removed from his job for not doing his job
After he was investigated for indictment at the State AND the Federal level.
This reeks of them settling for crumbs.
He was doing his job, the question was how he did his job. Garner resisted arrest.
Your a moron.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk