NY Times commie rag needs your help everybody.

Theowl32

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2013
22,504
16,629
2,415


Loved it when they reported and attacked Nikki Haley spending over $50K on curtains, and it turned out it was the obama administration that had spent that on curtains.

Didn't you love that?
 
The White House should have cheap curtains?
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attack on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons.
 
Last edited:
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Yeah, why get the facts the first time?
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Yeah, why get the facts the first time?
Have you ever made a mistake?
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Yeah, why get the facts the first time?
Have you ever made a mistake?
For a newspaper, always get it right, but never the first time.
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..

WEgNODE.jpg
 
Last edited:
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..

snow·flake
ˈsnōˌflāk/
noun
noun: snowflake; plural noun: snowflakes
  1. 1.
    a flake of snow, especially a feathery ice crystal, typically displaying delicate sixfold symmetry.
  2. 2.
    a weak minded person, typically politically Left inclined, entitlement minded, part of the Me Too generation, Progressive, Democrat, Socialist
A " weak-minded person" sounds like a perfect definition of a Trumper who just tows the line without a thought.
 
Last edited:
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Yeah, why get the facts the first time?
Have you ever made a mistake?

Some of us try not to constantly make mistakes.
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?

Show me where they did that.

Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.

I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.

Again, you are too stupid to get it.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.

And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.

Don’t even try to deny it.
 
A " weak-minded person" sounds like a perfect definition of a Trumper who just tows the line without a thought.

That's only because you consider putting America's interests first, fighting for the American people, and working to keep America strong and prosperous.......a bad thing

And it's because you consider lawlessness, open borders and going soft on murderers and child molesters good for America.

Yeah, noone's surprised you see it that way
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.

And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.

Don’t even try to deny it.
I will and do deny your speculation. I use news sources as guides to the news, not as seq in stone reliable sources. I see a story that interests me and will go on to further research the story from different sources. I knew this particular story was not getting it right from rhe beginning, knowing the curtains would be blast proof curtains and hence, very expensive.
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attack on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons.
post their redaction.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.

And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.

Don’t even try to deny it.
I will and do deny your speculation. I use news sources as guides to the news, not as seq in stone reliable sources. I see a story that interests me and will go on to further research the story from different sources. I knew this particular story was not getting it right from rhe beginning, knowing the curtains would be blast proof curtains and hence, very expensive.

If they’d known the curtains were Obama’s doing they’d never have published an article about it in the first place.
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?

Show me where they did that.

Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.

I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.

Again, you are too stupid to get it.

I am posting the original story for you along with the retraction. The story makes clear that the curtains were purchased by the Obama Administration. State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy.

I find it ironic however that you snowflakes will listen to FOX and get all your information from such websites like Townhall, Zero Hedge, and other purveyors of false news and right-wing lies which would never think of issuing a correction (because they are junk news sites), but then you attack the NYTs because it corrects a mistake. No wonder fewer and fewer people are taking you guys seriously.
 
The left are too stupid to get the point. They are lost in their own bullshit. Just under the spell of group think and globalist propaganda.

NY TImes, the commie disgraced rag and not worthy of wiping my dirty ass has an obvious agenda. Morons like camp are too stupid to know they are nothing but a mere "pod" and under that propaganda spell.

Lets give some more examples of these pathetic stupid ass morons or "pods" of the globalists.

When has any left wing moron that claims THE global warming is such a fact ever call out al gore for his gargantuan carbon footprint? When? Show me the article written or the hype created. Why, if it is ONLY ABOUT THE global warming, wouldn't they call him out? Go ahead camp, explain that for us you pathetic mesmerized pod.

Go ahead and explain to all of us why the democrats who claim they want more taxes never voluntarily pay more when they can. Can a moron like camp explain that to any of us? Why is it ok for them to be protected by guns and live behind walls? Why doesn't the ny times attack the riches of hollywood or their decadence?

They cannot answer these questions. Just the same way they never attempt to ask if socialism was so great why are so many poor and middle class people so desperate to get here and not so much the other way around?

This is where they will claim Americans are moving to Nordic countries in great numbers. Yeah, rich Americans. Trust me, if you are wealthy you can have a great time in Somalia if you want. Then again that place is a shiiiiit fucking hole.

Which brings me to the next question. When was the last time we saw obama or clinton or any of those losers vacation to a shit hole like Haiti? obama did buy some really expensive villa in Tuscany though.

880fd57e0017bd9dcb4220ccfce1633c.jpg


There is their famous negro messiah, champion of the poor in Tuscany at their villa. Not a shit hole. Trust me. Been there.
 
Last edited:
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?

Show me where they did that.

Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.

I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.

Again, you are too stupid to get it.

I am posting the original story for you along with the retraction. The story makes clear that the curtains were purchased by the Obama Administration. State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy.

I find it ironic however that you snowflakes will listen to FOX and get all your information from such websites like Townhall, Zero Hedge, and other purveyors of false news and right-wing lies which would never think of issuing a correction (because they are junk news sites), but then you attack the NYTs because it corrects a mistake. No wonder fewer and fewer people are taking you guys seriously.
Way to still not get the fucking point you dipshit.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top