Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, why get the facts the first time?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Have you ever made a mistake?Yeah, why get the facts the first time?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
For a newspaper, always get it right, but never the first time.Have you ever made a mistake?Yeah, why get the facts the first time?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
A " weak-minded person" sounds like a perfect definition of a Trumper who just tows the line without a thought.They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
snow·flake
ˈsnōˌflāk/
noun
noun: snowflake; plural noun: snowflakes
- 1.
a flake of snow, especially a feathery ice crystal, typically displaying delicate sixfold symmetry.- 2.
a weak minded person, typically politically Left inclined, entitlement minded, part of the Me Too generation, Progressive, Democrat, Socialist
Have you ever made a mistake?Yeah, why get the facts the first time?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
A " weak-minded person" sounds like a perfect definition of a Trumper who just tows the line without a thought.
YesThe White House should have cheap curtains?
I will and do deny your speculation. I use news sources as guides to the news, not as seq in stone reliable sources. I see a story that interests me and will go on to further research the story from different sources. I knew this particular story was not getting it right from rhe beginning, knowing the curtains would be blast proof curtains and hence, very expensive.NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.
Don’t even try to deny it.
post their redaction.They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attack on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons.
I will and do deny your speculation. I use news sources as guides to the news, not as seq in stone reliable sources. I see a story that interests me and will go on to further research the story from different sources. I knew this particular story was not getting it right from rhe beginning, knowing the curtains would be blast proof curtains and hence, very expensive.NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.
Don’t even try to deny it.
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Show me where they did that.
Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.
I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.
Again, you are too stupid to get it.
Way to still not get the fucking point you dipshit.When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.
Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
Show me where they did that.
Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.
I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.
Again, you are too stupid to get it.
I am posting the original story for you along with the retraction. The story makes clear that the curtains were purchased by the Obama Administration. State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy.
I find it ironic however that you snowflakes will listen to FOX and get all your information from such websites like Townhall, Zero Hedge, and other purveyors of false news and right-wing lies which would never think of issuing a correction (because they are junk news sites), but then you attack the NYTs because it corrects a mistake. No wonder fewer and fewer people are taking you guys seriously.