NY Times commie rag needs your help everybody.

NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.

And if they happened to be for the president, but just as “truthful” you’d call them trash.

Don’t even try to deny it.
I will and do deny your speculation. I use news sources as guides to the news, not as seq in stone reliable sources. I see a story that interests me and will go on to further research the story from different sources. I knew this particular story was not getting it right from rhe beginning, knowing the curtains would be blast proof curtains and hence, very expensive.

If they’d known the curtains were Obama’s doing they’d never have published an article about it in the first place.
BINGO

You go it.
 
Must piss the RW'ers who rely on Trump talking points and whining about the media that unfairly broadcasts and reports Trump's non-stop compulsive lying day after day and his outrageously stupid comments. Gosh, if rhe media would just stop, the public could be kept unaware of what an asshole we put in the White House.
 
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?

Show me where they did that.

Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.

I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.

Again, you are too stupid to get it.

I am posting the original story for you along with the retraction. The story makes clear that the curtains were purchased by the Obama Administration. State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy.

I find it ironic however that you snowflakes will listen to FOX and get all your information from such websites like Townhall, Zero Hedge, and other purveyors of false news and right-wing lies which would never think of issuing a correction (because they are junk news sites), but then you attack the NYTs because it corrects a mistake. No wonder fewer and fewer people are taking you guys seriously.
Way to still not get the fucking point you dipshit.
You are definitely triggered. The point is lost on you because you are too blinded by your hatred of the media you cannot see the fallacy of your logic.
 
Last edited:
They corrected the mistake like real news organizations do.

Since real news offends the fake news conspiracy minded alternative facts snowflakes that inhabit the bizzarro world of Trumpist politics, your attacks on the NYT's is no surprise. It is all just blah, blah, blah and the same old shit over and over again from the Trumpist loons..
When you say they corrected the mistake, are you saying that they attacked the obama administration for spending that on curtains?

Show me where they did that.

Cause the "mistake" is not them attacking the wrong administration. It is that they attacked them at all for something they saw as wrong (the class warfare bullshit that the republicans are the party of the riiiiiich) and then not saying shit about the obama administration spending that money.

I doubt you will get my point. Keep thinking the democrats don't cater to the rich. The fact that you fall for ALL of their cliches is actually the real point.

Again, you are too stupid to get it.

I am posting the original story for you along with the retraction. The story makes clear that the curtains were purchased by the Obama Administration. State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy.

I find it ironic however that you snowflakes will listen to FOX and get all your information from such websites like Townhall, Zero Hedge, and other purveyors of false news and right-wing lies which would never think of issuing a correction (because they are junk news sites), but then you attack the NYTs because it corrects a mistake. No wonder fewer and fewer people are taking you guys seriously.
Actually what’s funny is a journalist would publish a false story without investing facts. Don’t preach about anyone else you just show your stupidity
 
Actually what’s funny is a journalist would publish a false story without investing facts.
Anyone who does this is NOT a 'journalist'. They are a Progressive Socialist with a computer, keyboard, and a liberal rag willing to give them a platform for their propaganda and lies.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
Well I guess that explains the shrinking subscription base and ad revenues, staff cuts, etc. the past several years.

The old grey lady...all the news that’s fit to fake.
 
They are probably made with a bullet and blast protective material such as padded Kevlar and specially strengthened hardware.
If that's true, why is this even a fucking story?

Sounds like a stupid commie "journalist" got his fact so incredibly fucked up that he should never be taken seriously for the remainder of his pathetic commie life.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
Well I guess that explains the shrinking subscription base and ad revenues, staff cuts, etc. the past several years.

The old grey lady...all the news that’s fit to fake.
Subscriptions have transformed from hard copies to online subscriptions. The NY Times has drastically increased its online subscriptions.
 
NY Times is one of the best news sources available. They cover rhe widest spectrum of news of any newspaper in rhe world. Occasionally they screw-up, but even as the nut job admits in rhe propaganda video, they quickly retract and apologize when a reporter or the editorial board makes mistakes. Their ethical and moral character are many levels above RW news sources and even the President and his White House.
Well I guess that explains the shrinking subscription base and ad revenues, staff cuts, etc. the past several years.

The old grey lady...all the news that’s fit to fake.
Subscriptions have transformed from hard copies to online subscriptions. The NY Times has drastically increased its online subscriptions.
Just read recently online revs were off too. They’re slowly working their way down the road to irrelevance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top