Not just California

[BULLDOG]

Neither of them got more votes than Clinton. Your claim is childish at best, and stoooopid otherwise.

Combined they did. therefore the american people didn't want him as president.

More people voted against him than for him.

Just admit you got sucked into your own attempt at a logic trap, and move on.

Do you really want to be seen as that dumb?

Do you really want to die on this feeble little hill?

You got served. deal with it.

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Your assumption is stupid, and more importantly invalid. I never once said the election wasn't valid. I said the obese orange clown isn't the preferred choice of the people. No matter how you try to spin it, that is the fact. Trump is president because of the Electoral College. Not because he was the preferred choice of voters. Voters preferred Hillary over Trump by more than 3 million votes. Trump wants you to believe that is not a fact.

 

[Crick]

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

I missed where anyone said Trump's election was invalidated.

And curious what this discussion has to do with the environment.

 

[martybegan]

Combined they did. therefore the american people didn't want him as president.

More people voted against him than for him.

Just admit you got sucked into your own attempt at a logic trap, and move on.

Do you really want to be seen as that dumb?

Do you really want to die on this feeble little hill?

You got served. deal with it.

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Your assumption is stupid, and more importantly invalid. I never once said the election wasn't valid. I said the obese orange clown isn't the preferred choice of the people. No matter how you try to spin it, that is the fact. Trump is president because of the Electoral College. Not because he was the preferred choice of voters. Voters preferred Hillary over Trump by more than 3 million votes. Trump wants you to believe that is not a fact.

It's all about invalidating the election, if not de jure, then de facto.

That you can't even admit that shows how much of a hack you are.

 

[martybegan]

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

I missed where anyone said Trump's election was invalidated.

And curious what this discussion has to do with the environment.

How about you follow the derailment part of the thread before commenting?

 

[SSDD]

Did America vote for Trump? No? Did the elitist electoral college select him? Yes? I guess in our case we got what they voted for.

PS I'd like to see the logic whereby you can blame the Australian forest fires on socialism

Spoken like a true commie...you are a disgrace to your service...if you aren't lying about that also...seems that you lie about everything else.

And yes, we voted for lower taxes, more jobs, and protection for the borders....finally a president who delivers on his promises.

 

[BULLDOG]

Do you really want to be seen as that dumb?

Do you really want to die on this feeble little hill?

You got served. deal with it.

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Your assumption is stupid, and more importantly invalid. I never once said the election wasn't valid. I said the obese orange clown isn't the preferred choice of the people. No matter how you try to spin it, that is the fact. Trump is president because of the Electoral College. Not because he was the preferred choice of voters. Voters preferred Hillary over Trump by more than 3 million votes. Trump wants you to believe that is not a fact.

It's all about invalidating the election, if not de jure, then de facto.

That you can't even admit that shows how much of a hack you are.

Nobody is claiming the election was invalid. Just that he is not the voter's choice. Voters wanted Hillary by more than 3 million votes.

 

[martybegan]

Do you really want to die on this feeble little hill?

You got served. deal with it.

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Your assumption is stupid, and more importantly invalid. I never once said the election wasn't valid. I said the obese orange clown isn't the preferred choice of the people. No matter how you try to spin it, that is the fact. Trump is president because of the Electoral College. Not because he was the preferred choice of voters. Voters preferred Hillary over Trump by more than 3 million votes. Trump wants you to believe that is not a fact.

It's all about invalidating the election, if not de jure, then de facto.

That you can't even admit that shows how much of a hack you are.

Nobody is claiming the election was invalid. Just that he is not the voter's choice. Voters wanted Hillary by more than 3 million votes.

and sometimes in baseball the winning team has less hits than the losing team.

Everything your side claims is about invalidating the election, again, if not de jure, then de facto.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Did America vote for Trump? No? Did the elitist electoral college select him? Yes? I guess in our case we got what they voted for.

PS I'd like to see the logic whereby you can blame the Australian forest fires on socialism

Now the electoral college is elitist?


What the fuck..


.

 

[BULLDOG]

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Your assumption is stupid, and more importantly invalid. I never once said the election wasn't valid. I said the obese orange clown isn't the preferred choice of the people. No matter how you try to spin it, that is the fact. Trump is president because of the Electoral College. Not because he was the preferred choice of voters. Voters preferred Hillary over Trump by more than 3 million votes. Trump wants you to believe that is not a fact.

It's all about invalidating the election, if not de jure, then de facto.

That you can't even admit that shows how much of a hack you are.

Nobody is claiming the election was invalid. Just that he is not the voter's choice. Voters wanted Hillary by more than 3 million votes.

and sometimes in baseball the winning team has less hits than the losing team.

Everything your side claims is about invalidating the election, again, if not de jure, then de facto.

Congratulations. You learned a couple of new words. You still sound like a whiny child though.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Present fires in Eastern Australia. From north of the Arctic Circle to the southern hemisphere, we have seen tremendous wildfires this year, many with loss of life.

MyFireWatch - Bushfire map information Australia

And fires happen, people die..

 

[HenryBHough]

Once one grasps the concept....

President of The United STATES.

Not "President of The American (and non-American participlants) voters".

Then it's not so hard.

Sadly, though, liberals are allowed to grasp naught but tits and asses. Of the underaged. Right, Creepy Joey B.?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm still confused over how CO2 causes both fires and floods, is there a left and right handed version of the molecule?

 

[Tax Man]

Did America vote for Trump? No? Did the elitist electoral college select him? Yes? I guess in our case we got what they voted for.

PS I'd like to see the logic whereby you can blame the Australian forest fires on socialism

Did America vote for Trump?

you need to stop posting, as it makes you look more the idiot that you are. More people in more states voted for President Trump over the sick, crooked, bitch who colluded not only with Russia but the whole liberal, lickspittle, lapdog, media, who with all that, couldn't cross the finish line......again...Give it up moron, your own crooked DNC voted against Bernie and those ex Bernie voters went to Trump...Such stupid twits who vote Democrat.

You need to quit showing your stupid! You are so wrong on so much I sometimes wonder why, other than for laughs, i read your posts.

 

[Tax Man]

Neither of them got more votes than Clinton. Your claim is childish at best, and stoooopid otherwise.

Combined they did. therefore the american people didn't want him as president.

More people voted against him than for him.

Just admit you got sucked into your own attempt at a logic trap, and move on.

Do you really want to be seen as that dumb?

Do you really want to die on this feeble little hill?

You got served. deal with it.

I was willing to let it drop, but I'll be happy to spend a couple of minutes listening to what you think is logic. Are you trying to say Perot and Bush were allies? They weren't opposing each other? Please make you case.

Your whole argument is 3 million more people voted for Hillary over Trump. Somehow in your addled mind this invalidates his election.

Since more people voted against Clinton than for him, I would assume his election is invalidated as well, by your rules.

Yours is a simple misapplication of the rules. You know it as does everyone else.

 

[Tax Man]

Once one grasps the concept....

President of The United STATES.

Not "President of The American (and non-American participlants) voters".

Then it's not so hard.

Sadly, though, liberals are allowed to grasp naught but tits and asses. Of the underaged. Right, Creepy Joey B.?

I live in a country with no leader, The United States of America.

 

[polarbear]

Did America vote for Trump? No? Did the elitist electoral college select him? Yes? I guess in our case we got what they voted for.

PS I'd like to see the logic whereby you can blame the Australian forest fires on socialism

Did America vote for Trump?

you need to stop posting, as it makes you look more the idiot that you are. More people in more states voted for President Trump over the sick, crooked, bitch who colluded not only with Russia but the whole liberal, lickspittle, lapdog, media, who with all that, couldn't cross the finish line......again...Give it up moron, your own crooked DNC voted against Bernie and those ex Bernie voters went to Trump...Such stupid twits who vote Democrat.

Voters didn't want Trump. More than 3 million more voted for Hillary. Now, this is where you start spouting something about the Electoral College. That still doesn't change the fact that more people wanted someone else.

Is that the same 3 million idiots who believe Hillary who claims she lost to Trump because he "colluded with Russia" or are these extra 3 million by any chance mostly those who never had to prove citizenship when they checked off that box?

 

[polarbear]

I'm still confused over how CO2 causes both fires and floods, is there a left and right handed version of the molecule?

Only total idiots were building houses in areas prone to forest fires or floods and now there are lots of idiots who say it would be okay if we only had as much CO2 as the IPCC recommends.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm still confused over how CO2 causes both fires and floods, is there a left and right handed version of the molecule?

Only total idiots were building houses in areas prone to forest fires or floods and now there are lots of idiots who say it would be okay if we only had as much CO2 as the IPCC recommends.

But the OP isn't proof of "Global warming" right? I mean it's just an article on forest fires and we're assuming that given the poster, this was making a case for global warming. Perhaps we're mistaken

 

[polarbear]

I'm still confused over how CO2 causes both fires and floods, is there a left and right handed version of the molecule?

Only total idiots were building houses in areas prone to forest fires or floods and now there are lots of idiots who say it would be okay if we only had as much CO2 as the IPCC recommends.

But the OP isn't proof of "Global warming" right? I mean it's just an article on forest fires and we're assuming that given the poster, this was making a case for global warming. Perhaps we're mistaken

My neighbor in Germany was convicted of "Holz Diebstahl" (theft of wood) because he collected some dead wood as kindling for his fire place. Another friend who used to be a farmer in Manitoba got nailed for the same thing when he did that on the land he bought in Australia. Another guy I know lives in Sacramento and he also tells me that its illegal in California to remove dead wood from the forest to use it as kindling. That dead wood which has to stay where it is works better than paper and almost as good as a splash of diesel to get a fire going with a single match.
Pretty sure Trump has a fireplace and knows what kind of fuel source all this dead wood is that litters the forests in California....only idiots who keep posting it`s the CO2 would light a camp fire in the middle of a forest without clearing the dead wood from the area.

 

[cnm]

By that logic Bill Clinton was the president most people didn't want, because Perot and Bush the First got more votes.

Did he not get the plurality, as Trump did not?