North Carolina GOP solves the sea level rise problem

Yeah I saw that. It sucks. But which projections a govt uses to mitigate effects DOES matter.

An engineer would use the WORST CASE scenario to prevent malfunctions, and has to trade off COST against reliability.

Still - GOVTs have to avoid "speculation" and "hysteria tho -- us technical geeks don't. Ain't part of the design process.
 
Idiots posting at USMB solve the problem with virtual and actual spam.
 
OP is doing what Warmists do best: Mislead People.
From the article:
Republican legislators circulated a bill (which hasn't passed) that states, "rates shall only be determined using historical data, and these data shall be limited to the time period following the year 1900."
Where's the "made illegal" part? Hint: It isn't there.

I realize you ignorant Warmist Alarmist types are easily influenced by Snake Oil Salesmen with flashy slide show presentations of icebergs greaking off and polar bears whom you seem to think can't swim. And you wanna' use this false info to enact laws straight out of Agenda 21 to shut down our economy, but this is from the NOAA:

C3: NOAA Says U.S. Cooling Over Last 15 Years: -3.4°F/Century Rate, As of July 2011
For the 10-year period ending July 2011 (August 1, 2001 thru July 30, 2011 – 120 months), the cooling trend accelerates to a very significant minus 12.4°F per century rate - again, per the updated NOAA/NCDC temperature records.
"The Sky is falling! The Sky is falling! Give us all you rights and shut down your Economy! NOW!"

You get your news from Comedy Central yet you make fun of anyone who watches FoxNews. :cuckoo:

You people are such Dopes!
 
I've been hearing how sea levels will be rising since the 80's. Still hasn't happened.
 
You should give up flap yap and talking points and actually try researching the issue. Too much to expect, I am quite sure.
 
I've been hearing how sea levels will be rising since the 80's. Still hasn't happened.

Your proof of this is what? You just post foolish flap yap, never bother to research the issue. A reflection of your intellect to be sure.


http://www.icess.ucsb.edu/~davey/Geog163/Readings/annurev-marine-120308-081105.pdf


Measuring sea level change and understanding its causes has considerably improved in the recent years, essentially because new in situ and remote sensing observations have become available. Here we report on most recent results on contemporary sea level rise.We first present sea level observations from tide gauges over the twentieth century and from satellite altimetry since the early 1990s. We next discuss the most recent progress made in quantifying the processes causing sea level change on timescales ranging from years to decades, i.e., thermal expansion of the oceans, land ice mass
loss, and land water–storage change.We show that for the 1993–2007 time span, the sum of climate-related contributions (2.85 ± 0.35 mm year−1) is only slightly less than altimetry-based sea level rise (3.3 ± 0.4 mm year−1): ∼30% of the observed rate of rise is due to ocean thermal expansion and ∼55% results from land ice melt. Recent acceleration in glacier melting and ice mass loss from the ice sheets increases the latter contribution up to 80% for the past five years.We also review the main causes of regional variability in sea level trends: The dominant contribution results from nonuniform
changes in ocean thermal expansion.
145
 
You should give up flap yap and talking points and actually try researching the issue. Too much to expect, I am quite sure.
Unlike yourself, I actually have.

The Global Warmist/Alarmist movement can be traced back to UN Agenda 21, which you claim doesn't exist. "Conspiracy Theorist!"

Start your new research there, if you dare.
 
Ah yes. Damn that UN. Joseph Fourier was their agent in the 1820's when he noted that something in the atmosphere had to be absorbing the reflected and reradiated energy from the earth's surface in order for the temperature to be as warm as it was at that time. Then there was the English agent, Tyndall, that first mapped the absorption spectra of the GHGs in 1858. And lastly, the Super Agent from Sweden, Svante Arrhenius, that put it all together in 1896, and made some really prescient predictions about the increase in heat in that atmosphere from the increase in GHGs.

Mad, you wear your name well.
 
So O.R. at a rate of 3.3mm/yr -- Does the N.C. legislature have to RUN or WALK away from the ocean's edge to save lives and property?

And do we care about the glacier melt addition if it's only twice as high as the thermal expansion for a one degC rise? Heck -- the thermal expansion rise should be in the noise as far as SERIOUS effects on public policy. At least until we can fry our hushpuppies on rocks in the sun..
 
OP is doing what Warmists do best: Mislead People.
From the article:
Republican legislators circulated a bill (which hasn't passed) that states, "rates shall only be determined using historical data, and these data shall be limited to the time period following the year 1900."
Where's the "made illegal" part? Hint: It isn't there.
Wow, MadRetard, you sure are stupid and colossally ignorant . North Carolina Republicans have written language into a bill that would make it illegal for any state agency to use the actual scientific estimates of sea level rise in the next century, that are based on changing conditions brought on by global warming, and which scientists estimate to be at least a meter and possibly several meters by the end of the century. Instead the proposed law would require the state government, in its planning for the future, to use an estimated sea level rise based only on what happened in the last century - "Rates of seas-level rise may be extrapolated linearly" - which would be a maximum of about 12 inches. They are doing this at the behest of the NC development interests who don't want any inconvenient scientific facts getting in the way of their making tons of money building homes and businesses in areas that are going to be flooded within a few decades.





I realize you ignorant Warmist Alarmist types are easily influenced by Snake Oil Salesmen with flashy slide show presentations of icebergs greaking off and polar bears whom you seem to think can't swim. And you wanna' use this false info to enact laws straight out of Agenda 21 to shut down our economy, but this is from the NOAA:

C3: NOAA Says U.S. Cooling Over Last 15 Years: -3.4°F/Century Rate, As of July 2011
For the 10-year period ending July 2011 (August 1, 2001 thru July 30, 2011 – 120 months), the cooling trend accelerates to a very significant minus 12.4°F per century rate - again, per the updated NOAA/NCDC temperature records.
"The Sky is falling! The Sky is falling! Give us all you rights and shut down your Economy! NOW!"
We all realize that you ignorant moronic denier cult dingbats are easily bamboozled and duped by slimy propagandists working for the fossil fuel industry with their idiotic and absurd pseudo-science, misinformation and lies that play off of your inability to comprehend science and your rightwingnut prejudices. And you want to use the false information and outright lies that you've fallen for to prevent the intelligent and informed people from dealing with the biggest challenge to the survival of the human race that we've ever faced. You poor deluded retard!

And no, MadRetard, the BS you posted is not from NOAA as you claimed. It is from a denier cult blog that is as stupid and misinformed as you are.

NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries
Earth has been growing warmer for more than fifty years
NOAA

July 28, 2010
(excerpts)

The 2009 State of the Climate report released today draws on data for 10 key climate indicators that all point to the same finding: the scientific evidence that our world is warming is unmistakable. More than 300 scientists from 160 research groups in 48 countries contributed to the report, which confirms that the past decade was the warmest on record and that the Earth has been growing warmer over the last 50 years. Based on comprehensive data from multiple sources, the report defines 10 measurable planet-wide features used to gauge global temperature changes. The relative movement of each of these indicators proves consistent with a warming world. Seven indicators are rising: air temperature over land, sea-surface temperature, air temperature over oceans, sea level, ocean heat, humidity and tropospheric temperature in the “active-weather” layer of the atmosphere closest to the Earth’s surface. Three indicators are declining: Arctic sea ice, glaciers and spring snow cover in the Northern hemisphere. “For the first time, and in a single compelling comparison, the analysis brings together multiple observational records from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the ocean,” said Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D., under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. “The records come from many institutions worldwide. They use data collected from diverse sources, including satellites, weather balloons, weather stations, ships, buoys and field surveys. These independently produced lines of evidence all point to the same conclusion: our planet is warming,”

“Despite the variability caused by short-term changes, the analysis conducted for this report illustrates why we are so confident the world is warming,” said Peter Stott, Ph.D., contributor to the report and head of Climate Monitoring and Attribution of the United Kingdom Met Office Hadley Centre. “When we look at air temperature and other indicators of climate, we see highs and lows in the data from year to year because of natural variability. Understanding climate change requires looking at the longer-term record. When we follow decade-to-decade trends using multiple data sets and independent analyses from around the world, we see clear and unmistakable signs of a warming world.” While year-to-year changes in temperature often reflect natural climatic variations such as El Niño/La Niña events, changes in average temperature from decade-to-decade reveal long-term trends such as global warming. Each of the last three decades has been much warmer than the decade before. At the time, the 1980s was the hottest decade on record. In the 1990s, every year was warmer than the average of the previous decade. The 2000s were warmer still. “The temperature increase of one degree Fahrenheit over the past 50 years may seem small, but it has already altered our planet,” said Deke Arndt, co-editor of the report and chief of the Climate Monitoring Branch of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. “Glaciers and sea ice are melting, heavy rainfall is intensifying and heat waves are more common. And, as the new report tells us, there is now evidence that over 90 percent of warming over the past 50 years has gone into our ocean.”


warmingindicators.jpg



U.S. records warmest March; more than 15,000 warm temperature records broken
Summary Information - March 2012
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Climatic Data Center

(excerpts)

First quarter of 2012 also warmest on record; early March tornado outbreak is year's first "billion dollar disaster"

Record and near-record breaking temperatures dominated the eastern two-thirds of the nation and contributed to the warmest March on record for the contiguous United States, a record that dates back to 1895. More than 15,000 warm temperature records were broken during the month. The average temperature of 51.1°F was 8.6 degrees above the 20th century average for March and 0.5°F warmer than the previous warmest March in 1910. Of the more than 1,400 months (117+ years) that have passed since the U.S. climate record began, only one month, January 2006, has seen a larger departure from its average temperature than March 2012. Note: The March 2012 Monthly Climate Report for the United States has several pages of supplemental information and data regarding the unprecedented early 2012 temperatures.

Every state in the nation experienced at least one record warm daily temperature during March. According to preliminary data, there were 15,272 warm temperature records broken (7,755 daytime records, 7,517 nighttime records). Hundreds of locations across the country broke their all-time March records. There were 21 instances of the nighttime temperatures being as warm, or warmer, than the existing record daytime temperature for a given date. A persistent weather pattern led to 25 states east of the Rockies having their warmest March on record. An additional 15 states had monthly temperatures ranking among their ten warmest.







You get your news from Comedy Central yet you make fun of anyone who watches FoxNews. :cuckoo: You people are such Dopes!
Actually MadRetard, intelligent people get their "news" about global warming from reputable scientific sources. We just get some comic relief from watching Colbert and Comedy Central. Making fun of people who imagine that they are actually getting any real news instead of highly slanted and spun rightwingnut propaganda from FauxNews is entirely legitimate and reasonable. You cretins are :cuckoo:. You denier cult retards get your 'news' about global warming from braindead denier cult blogs and rightwingnut 'think tanks'/propaganda outlets sponsored by the fossil fuel industry. You denier cultists are such clueless idiots
 
So O.R. at a rate of 3.3mm/yr -- Does the N.C. legislature have to RUN or WALK away from the ocean's edge to save lives and property?

And do we care about the glacier melt addition if it's only twice as high as the thermal expansion for a one degC rise? Heck -- the thermal expansion rise should be in the noise as far as SERIOUS effects on public policy. At least until we can fry our hushpuppies on rocks in the sun..

A rate that is increasing. But such minor points are clearly beyond your understanding.
 
Think you know what a "green job" is??


Dollar to 1,000 stale donuts, you dont!!!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:


Testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform


You want absurd..........I give you........ABSURD ( but qualifies for federal support $$ )


Example 1.......a plumber who installs low volume toilets = green job.:eek: Plumber installing regular toilet = fuck you.:lol::lol:


Example 2:.....work in a science museum = green job.:eek: Non-science museum = fuck you.


Example 3: Publisher that distributes books on the environment = green job:eek:


http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/6-6-12-Full-Furchtgott-Roth.pdf
 
Last edited:
Republican legislators circulated a bill, which, as a Scientific American blog pointed out, stated that sea level "rates shall only be determined using historical data, and these data shall be limited to the time period following the year 1900."

Colbert joked that the "no politician wants" the graph predicting accelerating rates of sea level rise, since it looks like a "ski jump to hell." When GOP lawmakers use past data to predict the future "that makes that scary chart get all better," he declared.

Yep, if you select data carefully, no one will notice the rise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top