vlad_hombre
VIP Member
- Feb 7, 2017
- 774
- 196
- 60
This thread is a byproduct of the fake news industry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Democrats settled science used faked data to support Obamas Parris climate accord.....
ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data | Zero Hedge
It's all about your liberal hoax....This thread is a byproduct of the fake news industry.
Yup, that's exactly the kind of denier lie I'm talking about.You mean like noaa corrupting the data.....I agree....The truth is always more cool than deniers' lies.Cool story bro....Actually, the buoy data supports the new NOAA data.Why exclude the buoy data to favor the ship data?Sure, that's why Bates and Rose had to fake that graph.
But...but....it's noaa.....Yup, that's exactly the kind of denier lie I'm talking about.You mean like noaa corrupting the data.....I agree....The truth is always more cool than deniers' lies.Cool story bro....Actually, the buoy data supports the new NOAA data.Why exclude the buoy data to favor the ship data?
What I seeing in the plot is that the numbers most of us here agree on have current temps lower now than they were in '98, and that this is consistant with NOAA's other numbers showing the clear and present global cooling threat that we've been suffering for the past ten thousand years....an honest graph...
Just to show what incredible liars are at the fake news site Zero Hedge, the "whistleblower" in an interview with The Associated Press said there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."Democrats settled science used faked data to support Obamas Parris climate accord.....
ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data | Zero Hedge
And how exactly do you see that???What I seeing in the plot is that the numbers most of us here agree on have current temps lower now than they were in '98, and that this is consistant with NOAA's other numbers showing the clear and present global cooling threat that we've been suffering for the past ten thousand years....an honest graph...
Zero Hedge doesn't make me mad, come to think of it neither does April Fools Day. ZH however doesn't use my tax dollars and it still gives me a trail to follow all the way to the Former NOAA Scientist Confirms Colleagues Manipulated Climate Records where we can see how congress has come to see what a leftwing tool that NOAA's become....fake news site Zero Hedge...
It is really despicable when you think about the dishonesty of the Obama Administration. I guess environmental wacko billionaires lke Tom Steyer paid Obama and the NOAA to lie. He gave tens of millions to the Democrats in 2015.
NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data.
After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.
Last night Mr Smith thanked Dr Bates "for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion".
He added: "The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study."
Professor Curry, now the president of the Climate Forecast Applications Network, said last night: ‘Large adjustments to the raw data, and substantial changes in successive dataset versions, imply substantial uncertainties.’
It was time, she said, that politicians and policymakers took these uncertainties on board.
As usual, nothing but lies.It is really despicable when you think about the dishonesty of the Obama Administration. I guess environmental wacko billionaires lke Tom Steyer paid Obama and the NOAA to lie. He gave tens of millions to the Democrats in 2015.
NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data.
After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.
Last night Mr Smith thanked Dr Bates "for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion".
He added: "The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study."
Professor Curry, now the president of the Climate Forecast Applications Network, said last night: ‘Large adjustments to the raw data, and substantial changes in successive dataset versions, imply substantial uncertainties.’
It was time, she said, that politicians and policymakers took these uncertainties on board.
But the GOP House DOES waste your tax dollars with obvious lies!!!Zero Hedge doesn't make me mad, come to think of it neither does April Fools Day. ZH however doesn't use my tax dollars and it still gives me a trail to follow all the way to the Former NOAA Scientist Confirms Colleagues Manipulated Climate Records where we can see how congress has come to see what a leftwing tool that NOAA's...fake news site Zero Hedge...
Why exclude the buoy data to favor the ship data?Sure, that's why Bates and Rose had to fake that graph.Keep with your hockey stick, it's settled science....What is fake is the graph on your link, but you are too stupid to know it!!!No one is going to carry your MMGW settled science forward, it's fake....That's right, only the Right-wing fake news sites like FAUX and ZeroCredibility, etc. will carry this discredited fake news.
Bates and his partner in crime Rose were already caught falsifying the graph. They fudged the data in their graph and got caught, which is why Bates now only claims Karl didn't archive his proven to be correct data properly.
--and we can agree that this is what the NYTimes says that the Associated Press says that Bates said.... "whistleblower" in an interview with The Associated Press said there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."...