miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,556
- 70,505
- 2,645
- Banned
- #361
It means that I think you are a sick, America hating freak.What the fuck is that supposed to mean moron? Are you implying that I condone child sexual a abuse. Please point to something that I posted that supports that claim or shut the fuck up.I hope you meet up with a mad dad.That is quite an unhinged, bizarre and psychotic rant, that fails to deal with the points that I made in my post. Rather you deflect to some crap about homosexuality and how the APA classifies it with some questionable statics that are not sources . Then you reiterate the bold faced lie that we want to "decriminalize child rape" with absolutely no proof or evidence . You are a fucking shameless liar and fraud!Salon has run articles on how bad pedophiles feel n stuff when people discriminate against the poor hapless dears. Others just hide the fact faggots harbored pedoes and pretend they never heard of NAMBLA and its ILGA founding membership, and of course the faggots masquerading as 'mental health researchers' can be counted on to produce fake 'science' for their fellow faggots to run around peddling.
So you just post this stuff, making reference to "some articles" but think that you don't have to document it.?? Never mind I know what you're referring to, and I know why you didn't post a link. You didn't because those article don't say what you want them to say and don't support the claims that you people are making
They are talking about removing the stigma of the disease that is pedophilia and are distinguishing the disorder from the crime of child abuse. That is a far cry from stating that there is a "movement to "normalize" or decriminalize child sexual abuse. Th=.e only thing that I can't figure out about you people is if you are really this stupid, or that you are a shameless liar .
Opinion | Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines pedophilia as an intense and recurrent sexual interest in prepubescent children, and a disorder if it causes a person “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty” or if the person acts on his interests. Yet our laws ignore pedophilia until after the commission of a sexual offense, emphasizing punishment, not prevention.
Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims.
Many of these people are struggling with the disorder, and do not abuse children . Lifting the stigma and allowing them to come out of the shadows so that they can get the help and support that they need can protect children and prevent abuse. You "movement is that of "virtuous pedophiles" who come together to support one another in their quest to not offend.
Should We Lift the Stigma on “Virtuous Pedophiles”?
Ordinarily, when we speak of pedophiles, we tend to refer to those people who not only feel the desire to have sexual relations with minors but who act on that desire as well. The notion of “virtuous pedophiles” might therefore at first glance seem like an oxymoron—there is nothing “virtuous” about sexually preying on defenseless children, and the title might even appear to be trying to justify immoral and harmful conduct (as some pedophile-oriented web sites apparently do). But it is at least conceptually coherent to distinguish between the conduct of pedophilia—acting sexually upon children—and the mere status of pedophilia—experiencing a desire for such sexual activity. While the former can and should be subject to criminal penalties, the latter, if criminalized, would be a sort of “thought crime” that is and should be anathema to our system of justice. So the real question may be this: Do we trust that there truly are “virtuous pedophiles,” this category of those whose conduct does not reflect their status? (And perhaps a close second question would be: Do we believe that all or most of the specific self-proclaimed “virtuous pedophiles” are in reality what they claim to be?).
I'm quite sure that this will have zero effect on you and your moronic minions, because you are either incapable of learning , fearful of facts that undermine what you want to believe.
'
And right on cue it goes into 'Pedoes Are Just Misunderstood!!! N Stuff!!!' mode, pulling out silly articles from his fellow Pedo-Friendlies as if we're supposed to beleive a word these sick freaks say about anything. These 'mental health experts' lost an cred they had back in the early 1970's, when they caved in to the Faggot Privilege Movement's Mau-mauing the APA,; they caved only because the faggots threatened to cost their private practices money. Even at that, the faggots of course lie about the real results. Some 5,800 voted to remove faggot tetishists from the mental disorder category, some 3,800 were honest and brave enough to oppose re-classifying the fetish, but some 10,000 refused to vote at all, so barely 25% of the APA membership od some 20,000 voted to remove the sickos from the sicko list. This vote of course makes it very clear that 'science' didn't have a thing to do with re-classifying it.
Nobody with any sanity claims 'decriminalizing' child rape is some sort of societal 'obligation', so we know where you're coming from, sicko boi.