Newark Star-Ledger: Trump on 5th Avenue, shoots American Justice.

Yes. Nobody believed Trump would win. Not even Trump. He didn't win the popular vote, and only a glitch in the electoral college made him president. He wouldn't have been able to do that without Russia helping him.
I predicted he would sweep the primaries, and win the general election. I made most of these predictions in another forum, but here one from USMB (April 6, 2016) >>>

"It's already Trump. Has been since the day he declared back in July. The GOP can't nominate anyone else. If they do, Trump runs independently, and then they'll have to withdraw their RINO, or give the White House to the Democrat."

2016 Election Prediction Thread

As for the "popular vote", Trump won the AMERICAN popular vote.

That was more right wing furver than belief.
 
Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.
Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...


How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.


How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.
We don't know that... We don't know much. our cable media is a fos gabfest all of it.


Damn, did hell just freeze over? A regressive admitting he doesn't know much, for once we can agree.


.
 
Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.
Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...


How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.


How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.


So tell us child, exactly what action has Trump taken to shut down the investigation?


.
 
Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...


How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.


How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.


So tell us child, exactly what action has Trump taken to shut down the investigation?


.

Some questions are just too dumb to bother with an answer.
 
Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.
When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.
 
The Chief Executive just shot the negotiations with North Korea. Will that cause any stir in his following?
 
How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.


How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.


So tell us child, exactly what action has Trump taken to shut down the investigation?


.

Some questions are just too dumb to bother with an answer.


Translation, you can't think of one action taken by Trump to close the investigation.


.
 
Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.
When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.
 
Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.


How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.


So tell us child, exactly what action has Trump taken to shut down the investigation?


.

Some questions are just too dumb to bother with an answer.


Translation, you can't think of one action taken by Trump to close the investigation.


.

That's funny. I don't care who you are.
 
Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.
When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.


I've read it many times, what hasn't been published is the additional authority Mueller has taken upon himself, or what expost facto authority Rosenstein has granted. Like Rosenstein granting authority a week after the Manafort raid.


.
 
Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.
When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.


I've read it many times, what hasn't been published is the additional authority Mueller has taken upon himself, or what expost facto authority Rosenstein has granted. Like Rosenstein granting authority a week after the Manafort raid.


.

Rosenstein had authority to grant what ever he thought was required. Quit whining. Traitors don't get a pass over a technicality.
 
When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.


I've read it many times, what hasn't been published is the additional authority Mueller has taken upon himself, or what expost facto authority Rosenstein has granted. Like Rosenstein granting authority a week after the Manafort raid.


.

Rosenstein had authority to grant what ever he thought was required. Quit whining. Traitors don't get a pass over a technicality.


So you think Rosenstein now presides over a fourth branch of government? Note to the clueless, he doesn't, he's bound by law and DOJ policies. Congress allowed the independent counsel law to expire for a reason, Rosenstein doesn't have the unilateral authority to resurrect it.


.
 
Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.


:link::link::link:


.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1


Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.
Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...


How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.





Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Scott Peterson wasn't a "target" in the disappearance of his wife - until her body parts started washing up on shore.
Just because you're not a "target" does not mean you've been cleared as a "suspect".
Catching on yet...?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.


The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.


I've read it many times, what hasn't been published is the additional authority Mueller has taken upon himself, or what expost facto authority Rosenstein has granted. Like Rosenstein granting authority a week after the Manafort raid.


.

Rosenstein had authority to grant what ever he thought was required. Quit whining. Traitors don't get a pass over a technicality.


So you think Rosenstein now presides over a fourth branch of government? Note to the clueless, he doesn't, he's bound by law and DOJ policies. Congress allowed the independent counsel law to expire for a reason, Rosenstein doesn't have the unilateral authority to resurrect it.


.

Odd that you would have this knowledge, but the government doesn't seem to know it. Perhaps you should go to Washington and straighten them all out. I'm always impressed how random nut jobs on the internet always know things that the top levels of our government don't.
 
Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.


:link::link::link:


.

Just how dumb are you?
I know the orange idiot says he loves the uneducated but you're taking this "sucking up" thing way too far.


Well child, you might want to read the posting rules. You will find if you quote a copyright source, as the OP did in his title, your are required to provide a link to the source. Someone here isn't educated, but it's not me.


.
 
The Russian indictments have all ready been handed down, along with a statement that no American knowingly participated and it didn't alter the outcome of the election. That covered Muellers original tasking, why is he still going?


.

Well, no. The investigation isn't over, and you have no idea if any more indictments will be coming. First, you should find out what Mueller's origonal tasking was, and go from there.


I've read it many times, what hasn't been published is the additional authority Mueller has taken upon himself, or what expost facto authority Rosenstein has granted. Like Rosenstein granting authority a week after the Manafort raid.


.

Rosenstein had authority to grant what ever he thought was required. Quit whining. Traitors don't get a pass over a technicality.


So you think Rosenstein now presides over a fourth branch of government? Note to the clueless, he doesn't, he's bound by law and DOJ policies. Congress allowed the independent counsel law to expire for a reason, Rosenstein doesn't have the unilateral authority to resurrect it.


.

Odd that you would have this knowledge, but the government doesn't seem to know it. Perhaps you should go to Washington and straighten them all out. I'm always impressed how random nut jobs on the internet always know things that the top levels of our government don't.


'Special Counsel' less independent now than under expired Watergate-era law


.
 

Forum List

Back
Top