Newark Star-Ledger: Trump on 5th Avenue, shoots American Justice.

[francoHFW]

There's nothing wrong with investigating Russian interference. They're just investigating the wrong party.

There is no evidence the Russians had had anything to do with the Democrats, super duper.

 

[francoHFW]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

 

[francoHFW]

Spygate------The scandal of Trump working with Russian spies to steal the election. He is not the legitimate president.

Democrats are who tried to steal the election. Hillary was not a legitimate candidate.

What? LOL! Never even investigated on anything. The scandals against her were total garbage.

 

[OKTexas]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

 

[AmericanTruther]

 

[francoHFW]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

We do not know the findings of the investigation, super duper.

 

[BULLDOG]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Oh god......Another one of those "the founding fathers didn't envision electric lights so anything but an oil lamp is unconstitutional" idiots. The DOJ WAS established, and their scope and responsibilities were defined. The world is as it is. Not as you wish it was.

 

[OKTexas]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Oh god......Another one of those "the founding fathers didn't envision electric lights so anything but an oil lamp is unconstitutional" idiots. The DOJ WAS established, and their scope and responsibilities were defined. The world is as it is. Not as you wish it was.

Hey dipstick, I didn't bring the founders into this, the article in the OP are the ones that ignorantly invoked the founders. A typical appeal to authority fallacy.


.

 

[BULLDOG]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.

 

[OKTexas]

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.

How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

 

[francoHFW]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.

How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

We don't know that... We don't know much. our cable media is a fos gabfest all of it.

 

[BULLDOG]

Investigating Russian interference is not attacking Trump or spying or treason. Maybe attacking his scumbag accomplices who are so obvious. IE manafort and Cohen for you chumps.

.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Oh god......Another one of those "the founding fathers didn't envision electric lights so anything but an oil lamp is unconstitutional" idiots. The DOJ WAS established, and their scope and responsibilities were defined. The world is as it is. Not as you wish it was.

Hey dipstick, I didn't bring the founders into this, the article in the OP are the ones that ignorantly invoked the founders. A typical appeal to authority fallacy.


.

I responded to what you wrote. Try to get over it.

 

[BULLDOG]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw2xedEAV3MvbZGmGWEuwcW3&ampcf=1

Clueless regressives shouldn't be writing about things they don't understand. From your link:

Somehow, that doesn't seem like the way the Founders drew it up.

The founders didn't envision the DOJ at all, the DOJ was established by congress in 1870, almost 100 years after the founding. The founders charged the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed". All federal law enforcement authority is derived form the constitutional powers of the President. They are part of the executive branch and yes, he is their boss.


.

Not if he is being investigated. Our justice system is wonderful and Republicans are fos and a disgrace to name call them...

How many times does the DOJ have to tell you he's not a target of the investigation before you believe it? Comey said it 3 times, Rosenstein said it at least twice.


.

Do you know the difference between being a target of investigation and being a subject of investigation? Not much, and the change can come in the blink of an eye.

How many blinks have happened in the last two and a half years, hasn't happened yet.


.

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.

 

[protectionist]

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.

When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

 

[BULLDOG]

Great. If Trump is positive he isn't guilty of anything, why is he working so hard to shut down the investigation that will clear him. If it were to stop today, it wouldn't go away. The albetross around his neck would be massively worse than waiting until the investigation clears him. --------- That is if he hasn't done anything wrong.

When somebody finds a crime having been committed, THEN there can start to be an investigation. Since no one has found any crime, there isn't any "investigation". One can't investigate what doesn't exist.

Now with Obama and Hillary, that's different . Their multitude of crimes, is piled up high and just starting, finally, to be investigated (ex, Clinton's guilt in Henry/Ives, Saline county, Arkansas murder case Many more lined up after that.

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.

 

[protectionist]

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.

I didn't say Russia had no interference in our election. They did working hand in hand with Hillary, Bill, et al. And you can deny the accusations, but unlike the flimsy Mueller laughingstock, there is real evidence against the Clintons and Obama. It's HISTORICAL FACT. They will PAY for their misdeeds.

Why would one go with what you say, when you've been so wrong, so much in the past ?

April 11, 2016 >>
"The right has already given the left all it needs for this election year. All we need to do is point at Trump and Cruz and laugh. Thank you for such a powerful gift."

Strike 1.

March 4, 2016>>
"They handed the election to Hillary long ago. Other than the right's hard core base, who is going to vote for a party who thinks penis size is a valid point for debate? Hang it up and try again in four years. This one is already done."
Strike 2.​

Jun 25, 2016 >>

What does Trump have in common with Lincoln, T Roosevelt and Reagan
"None of them will be elected in the upcoming election." Strike 3.​

 

[BULLDOG]

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.

I didn't say Russia had no interference in our election. They did working hand in hand with Hillary, Bill, et al. And you can deny the accusations, but unlike the flimsy Mueller laughingstock, there is real evidence against the Clintons and Obama. It's HISTORICAL FACT. They will PAY for their misdeeds.

Why would one go with what you say, when you've been so wrong, so much in the past ?

April 11, 2016 >>
"The right has already given the left all it needs for this election year. All we need to do is point at Trump and Cruz and laugh. Thank you for such a powerful gift."

Strike 1.

March 4, 2016>>
"They handed the election to Hillary long ago. Other than the right's hard core base, who is going to vote for a party who thinks penis size is a valid point for debate? Hang it up and try again in four years. This one is already done."
Strike 2.​

Jun 25, 2016 >>

What does Trump have in common with Lincoln, T Roosevelt and Reagan
"None of them will be elected in the upcoming election." Strike 3.​

Yes. Nobody believed Trump would win. Not even Trump. He didn't win the popular vote, and only a glitch in the electoral college made him president. He wouldn't have been able to do that without Russia helping him.

 

[protectionist]

Yes. Nobody believed Trump would win. Not even Trump. He didn't win the popular vote, and only a glitch in the electoral college made him president. He wouldn't have been able to do that without Russia helping him.

I predicted he would sweep the primaries, and win the general election. I made most of these predictions in another forum, but here one from USMB (April 6, 2016) >>>

"It's already Trump. Has been since the day he declared back in July. The GOP can't nominate anyone else. If they do, Trump runs independently, and then they'll have to withdraw their RINO, or give the White House to the Democrat."

2016 Election Prediction Thread

As for the "popular vote", Trump won the AMERICAN popular vote.

 

[bripat9643]

Spygate------The scandal of Trump working with Russian spies to steal the election. He is not the legitimate president.

Hmmm, Hillary is the only one proven to have employed Russian spies.

 

[bripat9643]

Russia interfering in our elections is beyond question at this point. Only a brain dead Trumpbot would doubt that. Save your other accusations for story time at the nut house. I've heard them all, and they are a bunch of crap.

I didn't say Russia had no interference in our election. They did working hand in hand with Hillary, Bill, et al. And you can deny the accusations, but unlike the flimsy Mueller laughingstock, there is real evidence against the Clintons and Obama. It's HISTORICAL FACT. They will PAY for their misdeeds.

Why would one go with what you say, when you've been so wrong, so much in the past ?

April 11, 2016 >>
"The right has already given the left all it needs for this election year. All we need to do is point at Trump and Cruz and laugh. Thank you for such a powerful gift."

Strike 1.

March 4, 2016>>
"They handed the election to Hillary long ago. Other than the right's hard core base, who is going to vote for a party who thinks penis size is a valid point for debate? Hang it up and try again in four years. This one is already done."
Strike 2.​

Jun 25, 2016 >>

What does Trump have in common with Lincoln, T Roosevelt and Reagan
"None of them will be elected in the upcoming election." Strike 3.​

Yes. Nobody believed Trump would win. Not even Trump. He didn't win the popular vote, and only a glitch in the electoral college made him president. He wouldn't have been able to do that without Russia helping him.

You keep clinging to that if it makes you feel better.