- Thread starter
- #21
Hmmm...apparently you didn't use the G.I. Bill to go to college...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New Yorker Rips 'Redskins' Name With New Thanksgiving Cover
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
Hmmm...apparently you didn't use the G.I. Bill to go to college...
namvet
Gold Member
Reids outta here. this was one of his racists rants and who give a flying fuck what a faggot "New Yorker" thinks ??
Hmmm...apparently you didn't use the G.I. Bill to go to college...
which has to do with nothing. I went to tech school. did you make it past
kindergarten ?? didn't think so
Has anybody looked at a "New Yorker" cover in the last fifty years? I didn't even know they were still in business. I looks like a positive cover to me. Redskin Football fans invite Redskins to a a Thanksgiving party just like the good old days. Why are the radical lefties so angry about such trivial matters during Thanksgiving when they live in the greatest Country in the world? Would the lefties feel better if the Indians invited Redskins fans to their crooked gambling casinos and metaphorically scalped them?
There's the shitting bull we all know and love.
We should go with this new name and logo it fits Washington so well if the team is losing money it can get a bail out from the other teams and if they are trailing in a game they can redistribute some of the other teams points to them in the name of scoring equality.
We should go with this new name and logo it fits Washington so well if the team is losing money it can get a bail out from the other teams and if they are trailing in a game they can redistribute some of the other teams points to them in the name of scoring equality.
- Moderator
- #25
It's time to end the racist legacy of George Preston Marshall.
This is why you guys lost the election. You spent all your time focusing on shit that nobody cared about except a handful of you while Rome was burning.
namvet
Gold Member
There's the shitting bull we all know and love.
We should go with this new name and logo it fits Washington so well if the team is losing money it can get a bail out from the other teams and if they are trailing in a game they can redistribute some of the other teams points to them in the name of scoring equality.
I was thinking of the foreskins. in honor of Washington
Equally fitting.There's the shitting bull we all know and love.
We should go with this new name and logo it fits Washington so well if the team is losing money it can get a bail out from the other teams and if they are trailing in a game they can redistribute some of the other teams points to them in the name of scoring equality.
I was thinking of the foreskins. in honor of Washington
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #28
The New Yorker has weighed in on the Washington Redskins controversy with a poignant new cover for its Dec. 1 issue.
The magazine hit newsstands Monday as much of the country readies itself for Thanksgiving festivities. Its cover depicts jubilant pilgrims dressed in Redskins jerseys -- cheering, drinking beer and smoking cigars -- as their Native American guests look on with what appears to be stoic disapproval.
The cover is a clear comment on the controversy surrounding the NFL team in recent months, with many condemning the term "Redskins" as a racial epithet for Native Americans and calling for the team to change its name.
More: New Yorker Rips 'Redskins' Name With New Thanksgiving Cover
Thank you, New Yorker! Happy Thanksgiving!
That photo is racist.
Hater dupes don't know what racist means anymore lol...
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #30
Hater dupes don't know what racist means anymore lol...
You're right, how could I forget. "Racist" means anything that makes black people mad.
P.S. Learn how to speak and knock it off with the fucking Ebonics.
Racist means believing a race is inferior and discriminating against them. Like 50%+ of the GOP...
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #32
Racist means believing a race is inferior and discriminating against them. Like 50%+ of the GOP...
That's racist.
What's racist, brainwashed functional moron? lolRacist means believing a race is inferior and discriminating against them. Like 50%+ of the GOP...
That's racist.
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #34
What's racist, brainwashed functional moron? lolRacist means believing a race is inferior and discriminating against them. Like 50%+ of the GOP...
That's racist.
Once again, lose the Ebonics.
- Thread starter
- #36
Who gives a shit what you or the magazine thinks?
Apparently its readers.
- Thread starter
- #37
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #38
Who gives a shit what you or the magazine thinks?
Apparently its readers.
That's what the Enquirer says every time it publishes a story about Bat Boy.
- Banned
- #39
Who gives a shit what you or the magazine thinks?
LOL.......and yet NOBODY says shit about the Chiefs
Redskins is an insult duh.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 420
- Views
- 21K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 9K
- Replies
- 145
- Views
- 7K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 42
- Views
- 140
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 78
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8137
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-