New CBO Report Finds Up to 2.9 Million People Owe Their Jobs to the Recovery Act

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
71,525
51,375
3,605
*
New CBO Report Finds Up to 2.9 Million People Owe Their Jobs to the Recovery Act


A new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) increased the number of people employed by between 1.0 million and 2.9 million jobs as of June. [1]


In other words, between 1.0 million and 2.9 million people employed in June owed their jobs to the Recovery Act. This estimate, by Congress' non-partisan economic and budget analysts, is more comprehensive than the 550,000 jobs that ARRA recipients reported in July, CBO explains.


While the report focuses primarily on the second quarter of 2011, CBO also includes new projections of the Recovery Act's jobs impact through 2012. It finds that in the current quarter (the third quarter of 2011), there are 0.8 million to 2.5 million more people employed because of ARRA.
The CBO report indicates that ARRA succeeded in its primary goal of protecting the economy during the worst of the recession. As the economy recovers, ARRA's effects will continue to decrease. CBO estimates that ARRA's impact on employment peaked in the third quarter of 2010, when between 1.4 million and 3.6 million people owed their jobs to the Recovery Act.
ARRA Also Boosted Worker Hours, CBO Finds

In addition to saving and creating jobs, ARRA has increased the number of hours worked, CBO has concluded. That is, without ARRA, many full-time workers would have been reduced to part-time status and fewer would have worked overtime. The combination of the increase in jobs and the increase in hours means that ARRA boosted the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by between 1.4 million and 4.0 million as of June, the report estimates. CBO finds that this figure peaked in the third quarter of 2010, and stands at up to 3.4 million full-time equivalent jobs in the current quarter. [2]


Among ARRA's most effective provisions for saving and creating jobs, according to CBO's estimates, are direct purchases of goods and services by the federal government, transfer payments to states (such as extra Medicaid funding), and transfer payments to individuals (such as increased food stamp benefits and additional weeks of unemployment benefits). CBO's estimates indicate that tax cuts are less effective job producers, and tax cuts for higher-income people have very low bang for the buck.
 
I was actually at a Lenscrafters yesterday and I was talking to one of their employees who said Lenscrafters layed off a bunch of people, but are now rehiring even more because of the stimulus Obama is attempting to pump into the economy.

So yes, stimulus CAN work.
 
How many people have lost their Jobs because of Obamas policies?

How many people arent hired because of Obamas policies?

Score that would ya............
 
$800 billion (800,000 x $1 million) divided by 2.9 million = over $275k/job.
Now add in the combined worth of all the projects – the buildings that were built, the roads that were built, etc.
 
actual CBO report link...
http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/123xx/doc12385/08-24-ARRA.pdf

from the CBO report (not the third party piece in the OP)...

During the second quarter of calendar year 2011, according to recipients’ reports, ARRA funded more than 550,000 full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs.

2 Those reports, however, do not provide a comprehensive estimate of the law’s impact on U.S. employment, which could be higher or lower than the number of FTE jobs reported, for several reasons (in addition to any issues concerning the quality of the reports’ data).

3 First, some of the jobs included in the reports might have existed even without the stimulus package, with employees working on the same activities or other activities.

Second, the reports cover employers that received ARRA funding directly and those employers’ immediate subcontractors (the so-called primary and secondary recipients of ARRA funding) but not lower-level subcontractors.

Third, the reports do not attempt to measure the number of jobs that were created or retained indirectly as a result of recipients’ increased income, and the increased income of their employees, which could boost demand for other products and services as they spent their paychecks.

Fourth, the recipients’ reports cover only certain ARRA appropriations, which encompass about one-fifth of the total either spent by the government or conveyed through tax reductions in ARRA; the reports do not measure the effects of other provisions of the stimulus package, such as tax cuts and transfer payments (including unemployment insurance payments) to individual people.
How do you get good valid numbers by not counting all the data?


Estimating the law’s overall effects on employment requires a more comprehensive analysis than can be achieved by using the recipients’ reports. Therefore, looking at recorded spending to date along with estimates of the other effects of ARRA on spending and revenues, CBO has estimated the law’s impact on employment and economic output using evidence about the effects of previous similar policies and drawing on various mathematical models that represent the workings of the economy.
Translation: They guessed
 
Look at the Margin of Error! IT's unfuckingreal!

It's like me saying "tomorrows temperate in New York City will be between -100 and 200 degrees"

The MOE is so fucking huge it makes the study WORTHLESS!
 
actual CBO report link...
http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/123xx/doc12385/08-24-ARRA.pdf

from the CBO report (not the third party piece in the OP)...

During the second quarter of calendar year 2011, according to recipients’ reports, ARRA funded more than 550,000 full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs.

2 Those reports, however, do not provide a comprehensive estimate of the law’s impact on U.S. employment, which could be higher or lower than the number of FTE jobs reported, for several reasons (in addition to any issues concerning the quality of the reports’ data).

3 First, some of the jobs included in the reports might have existed even without the stimulus package, with employees working on the same activities or other activities.

Second, the reports cover employers that received ARRA funding directly and those employers’ immediate subcontractors (the so-called primary and secondary recipients of ARRA funding) but not lower-level subcontractors.

Third, the reports do not attempt to measure the number of jobs that were created or retained indirectly as a result of recipients’ increased income, and the increased income of their employees, which could boost demand for other products and services as they spent their paychecks.

Fourth, the recipients’ reports cover only certain ARRA appropriations, which encompass about one-fifth of the total either spent by the government or conveyed through tax reductions in ARRA; the reports do not measure the effects of other provisions of the stimulus package, such as tax cuts and transfer payments (including unemployment insurance payments) to individual people.
How do you get good valid numbers by not counting all the data?


Estimating the law’s overall effects on employment requires a more comprehensive analysis than can be achieved by using the recipients’ reports. Therefore, looking at recorded spending to date along with estimates of the other effects of ARRA on spending and revenues, CBO has estimated the law’s impact on employment and economic output using evidence about the effects of previous similar policies and drawing on various mathematical models that represent the workings of the economy.
Translation: They guessed

lol, I was just going over that. Add those 2 writers to the "haven't a fucking clue just make it look good" list. Brutal:cuckoo:
 
$800 billion (800,000 x $1 million) divided by 2.9 million = over $275k/job.
Now add in the combined worth of all the projects – the buildings that were built, the roads that were built, etc.
After that, calculate all the income taxes that these workers are now paying, and add that in, too.

Infrastructure investment was only $105.3 billion, of that, transportation accounted for a little under half.

A paltry $7.6 billion went to scientific research (outside of green energy).

A $288 billion plurality of the Stimulus was tax cuts: more of the same.

400px-Investmentbubble.jpg
 
Last edited:
Those reports, however, do not provide a comprehensive estimate of the law’s impact on U.S. employment, which could be higher or lower than the number of FTE jobs reported, for several reasons (in addition to any issues concerning the quality of the reports’ data).

Wipes d!ck on curtains.
 
How many people have lost their Jobs because of Obamas policies?

How many people arent hired because of Obamas policies?

Score that would ya............

Which policies? Specifically? And how?

Sallow I know you love asking that question as you ask it of me all the time. A long time ago in a land far away I actually gave you answers to your constant question. Weve covered this enough. I believe it, you dont. So why keep rehashing it. Im not into your busy work like I was when I was a noob here.

Carry on
 

Forum List

Back
Top