Netanyahu = Hitler

[Billo_Really]

I see.
So you reject Irose's innocuous first-hand stories because she can't prove their veracity yet you not only embrace the unsubstantiated stories from unidentified "Palestinians" as reported by Global Research, you deem Israel to be worthy of destruction.
I can tell you all Nazis share your methodology and POV, Princess.

I didn't reject her stories, I said they couldn't be considered a "fact" without corroborating evidence.

Eye-witness testimony is credible in any court of law. And if you bothered to go to the link and read what you're objecting to, you would see these people are not "unidentified", their names are clearly stated.

 

[Roudy]

and you prove that one with a reliable, unbiased source...and make sure those muslims we are talking about are members of HAMAS, because that is the claim i disputed.

SMACK! I love slapping Nazi cocksuckers like you. Ha ha ha.
Mein Kampf in the Arabic language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mein Kampf (English: My Struggle, Arabic: كفاحي* kifāḥ&#299, Adolf Hitler's 900-page autobiography outlining his political views, has been translated into Arabic a number of times since the early 1930s.

Mein Kampf has been pointed to as an example of the influence of Nazism for Arab nationalists. According to Stefan Wild of the University of Bonn, Hitler's philosophy of National Socialism – of a state headed by a single, strong, charismatic leader with a submissive and adoring people – was a model for the founders of the Arab nationalist movement. Arabs favored Germany over other European powers, because "Germany was seen as having no direct colonial or territorial ambitions in the area. This was an important point of sympathy", Wild wrote.[2] They also saw German nationhood—which preceded German statehood—as a model for their own movement.
In October 1938, anti-Jewish treatises that included extracts from Mein Kampf were disseminated at an Islamic parliamentarians' conference "for the defense of Palestine" in Cairo.[11][2][12]

A new translation was published in 1963, translated by Luis al-Haj, a Nazi war criminal originally named Luis Heiden who fled to Egypt after World War II. The book was republished in 1995 by Bisan Publishers in Beirut.[6] According to a September 8, 1999, Agence France Presse report, Mein Kampf ranked sixth on the bestseller list compiled by Dar el-Shuruq bookshop in Ramallah, with sales of about 10 copies a week.[7][8] The bookshop owner attributed its popularity to its having been unavailable in the Palestinian territories due to an Israeli ban, and the Palestinian National Authority recently allowing it to be sold.[8] As of 2002, newsdealers on Edgware Road in central London, an area with a large Arab population, were selling the translation.[6] In 2005, the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, an Israeli think tank, confirmed the continued sale of the Bisan edition in bookstores on Edgeware.[9] In 2007 an Agence France-Presse reporter interviewed a bookseller at the Cairo International Book Fair who stated he had sold many copies of Mein Kampf.[10]

pay attention..."HAMAS".

secondly, i do not agree with loinboy that eyewitness accounts are particularly reliable. i regard wiki as a reliable source for the most part, and if you read the above CAREFULLY, it does not dispel that rumour.

if one takes the time to read the whole article by wiki, one will find that, by and large, most arabs and muslims reject mein kampf, thaat it sold a bit in ramallah (10 copies/week)
after israel, that light unto nations and beacon of democracy (see the first amendment to the constitution of the United States of America) took it off their banned book list, which was very green of the israelis, as i imagine the book burnings that occurred in NAZI germany contribute to pollution. an outright ban prevents that.

i did like the last sentence. i do not rely on eyewitness accounts myself, although i do take them into consideraation, that last bit of "proof" you offer is a second hand eyewitnees account, something i think those protesting loinboy's sources would eschew.

the body of your "evidence" is second hand anecdotal stories at best, much of it describes events that, and consists of opinion, which wiki makes clear...and not once is HAMAS mentioned, which is what we were discussing.

maybe you should go back to the "slapping nazi cocksuckers" drawing board and come up with a better strategy.

That's what you call a Nazi cocksucker weaseling out of being embarrassed.

 

[Roudy]

"Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission" is your source? Really? It's nothing but an Islamic kangaroo court, you fucking ignorant illiterate nincompoop.

Kuala Lumpur is the forum, the source are the survivers of the violence.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That the Kuala Kangaroo Court is legit? I don't believe you are a Muslim so you can only be a Nazi.

The 9th circuit court of Timbuktu can turn over the Kuala Lumpur court's judgement. But nobody, not even the Messiah can over-rule the Supreme Court of Madgascar! Heh heh heh!

 

[Billo_Really]

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That the Kuala Kangaroo Court is legit?

Have you ever heard of the term "universal jurisdiction"? Any country committing crimes against humanity, can be tried by any court on the planet.

I don't believe you are a Muslim so you can only be a Nazi.

I'm a white, Irish Catholic.

Why would I be a nazi? Oh, I forgot, you call everyone a nazi.

 

[Roudy]

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That the Kuala Kangaroo Court is legit?

Have you ever heard of the term "universal jurisdiction"? Any country committing crimes against humanity, can be tried by any court on the planet.

I don't believe you are a Muslim so you can only be a Nazi.

I'm a white, Irish Catholic.

Why would I be a nazi? Oh, I forgot, you call everyone a nazi.

A Mel Gibson type Jew hater. Ha ha ha. You guys are a dime a dozen.

 

[Billo_Really]

A Mel Gibson type Jew hater. Ha ha ha. You guys are a dime a dozen.

His movie Payback, is a classic.

 

[SAYIT]

Kuala Lumpur is the forum, the source are the survivers of the violence.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That the Kuala Kangaroo Court is legit? I don't believe you are a Muslim so you can only be a Nazi.

The 9th circuit court of Timbuktu can turn over the Kuala Lumpur court's judgement. But nobody, not even the Messiah can over-rule the Supreme Court of Madgascar! Heh heh heh!

The KKC isn't a real court but merely a private organization with no legal authority, established in a majority Muslim country (Malaysia) by an internationally recognized anti-Semite (Mahathir Mohamad). Their findings and press releases are equal to those of the KKK in America.
Global Research exposes its agenda and lack of credibility by pretending the KCC has any legal standing.

 

[sealadaigh]

SMACK! I love slapping Nazi cocksuckers like you. Ha ha ha.
Mein Kampf in the Arabic language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mein Kampf (English: My Struggle, Arabic: كفاحي* kifāḥ&#299, Adolf Hitler's 900-page autobiography outlining his political views, has been translated into Arabic a number of times since the early 1930s.

Mein Kampf has been pointed to as an example of the influence of Nazism for Arab nationalists. According to Stefan Wild of the University of Bonn, Hitler's philosophy of National Socialism – of a state headed by a single, strong, charismatic leader with a submissive and adoring people – was a model for the founders of the Arab nationalist movement. Arabs favored Germany over other European powers, because "Germany was seen as having no direct colonial or territorial ambitions in the area. This was an important point of sympathy", Wild wrote.[2] They also saw German nationhood—which preceded German statehood—as a model for their own movement.
In October 1938, anti-Jewish treatises that included extracts from Mein Kampf were disseminated at an Islamic parliamentarians' conference "for the defense of Palestine" in Cairo.[11][2][12]

A new translation was published in 1963, translated by Luis al-Haj, a Nazi war criminal originally named Luis Heiden who fled to Egypt after World War II. The book was republished in 1995 by Bisan Publishers in Beirut.[6] According to a September 8, 1999, Agence France Presse report, Mein Kampf ranked sixth on the bestseller list compiled by Dar el-Shuruq bookshop in Ramallah, with sales of about 10 copies a week.[7][8] The bookshop owner attributed its popularity to its having been unavailable in the Palestinian territories due to an Israeli ban, and the Palestinian National Authority recently allowing it to be sold.[8] As of 2002, newsdealers on Edgware Road in central London, an area with a large Arab population, were selling the translation.[6] In 2005, the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, an Israeli think tank, confirmed the continued sale of the Bisan edition in bookstores on Edgeware.[9] In 2007 an Agence France-Presse reporter interviewed a bookseller at the Cairo International Book Fair who stated he had sold many copies of Mein Kampf.[10]

pay attention..."HAMAS".

secondly, i do not agree with loinboy that eyewitness accounts are particularly reliable. i regard wiki as a reliable source for the most part, and if you read the above CAREFULLY, it does not dispel that rumour.

if one takes the time to read the whole article by wiki, one will find that, by and large, most arabs and muslims reject mein kampf, thaat it sold a bit in ramallah (10 copies/week)
after israel, that light unto nations and beacon of democracy (see the first amendment to the constitution of the United States of America) took it off their banned book list, which was very green of the israelis, as i imagine the book burnings that occurred in NAZI germany contribute to pollution. an outright ban prevents that.

i did like the last sentence. i do not rely on eyewitness accounts myself, although i do take them into consideraation, that last bit of "proof" you offer is a second hand eyewitnees account, something i think those protesting loinboy's sources would eschew.

the body of your "evidence" is second hand anecdotal stories at best, much of it describes events that, and consists of opinion, which wiki makes clear...and not once is HAMAS mentioned, which is what we were discussing.

maybe you should go back to the "slapping nazi cocksuckers" drawing board and come up with a better strategy.

That's what you call a Nazi cocksucker weaseling out of being embarrassed.

no fook for brains. that is the sound of an irishman making a limp dicked judeokapo squeal like a poked pig.

if you had any semblance of a brain, you would see i was speaking about HAMAS all the time and specifically mentioned it, and that post was just a lesson to a stupid fook SKY on how to read critically.

what is really funny is that, whenever you zionists try to use a reputable source, it backfires on you and usuually proves you wrong.

 

[aSeattleConserv]

Just how barbaric and inhuman are the Israeli's?

The Muzzie Brotherhood, which has strong ties to Hamas,
Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ideology has two dominant features: Islamic imperialism and extreme Jew-hatred - Jihad Watch

also (as others have mentioned) had ties to Adolf Hitler:

"The Brotherhood's founder, al-Banna, was a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. During the 1930s, the Brotherhood became more political in nature and an officially political group in 1939. Over the years, the organization developed an apparatus through which to provide military training to its followers and to engage in political terrorism against Egyptian Coptic Christians and government officials."
The Muslim Brotherhood

But then Jew haters don't care about that do they loinboy?

 

[SAYIT]

What the hell is that supposed to mean? That the Kuala Kangaroo Court is legit?

Have you ever heard of the term "universal jurisdiction"? Any country committing crimes against humanity, can be tried by any court on the planet.

I don't believe you are a Muslim so you can only be a Nazi.

I'm a white, Irish Catholic.

Why would I be a nazi? Oh, I forgot, you call everyone a nazi.

If nothing else you are certainly dense. The Kuala Kangaroo Kourt (KKK) is not a real court but rather a private organization (like America's KKK) established in a majority Muslim country (Malaysia) by a known anti-Semite (Mahathir Mohamed). It has no legal standing or authority other than that it bestows upon itself.

 

[sealadaigh]

Just how barbaric and inhuman are the Israeli's?

The Muzzie Brotherhood, which has strong ties to Hamas,
Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ideology has two dominant features: Islamic imperialism and extreme Jew-hatred - Jihad Watch

also (as others have mentioned) had ties to Adolf Hitler:

"The Brotherhood's founder, al-Banna, was a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. During the 1930s, the Brotherhood became more political in nature and an officially political group in 1939. Over the years, the organization developed an apparatus through which to provide military training to its followers and to engage in political terrorism against Egyptian Coptic Christians and government officials."
The Muslim Brotherhood

But then Jew haters don't care about that do they loinboy?

ihad watch...give us a fookin' break, you stupid shite.

try thinkin' for yourself instead of being a whiney little sheep.

lemmee guess. jihad watch is a reputable source and jew watch is a hate site.

 

[daveman]

You're not walking on USMB, then. You're sitting on your ass mindlessly repeating terrorist propaganda.

Or is that some new definition of "kick-ass" of which I was unaware?

Citing international law, is terrorist propaganda?

There was no international law in the OP.

But here's some for you:

International Humanitarian Law - Customary Law

Let's see which ones Hamas is violating, shall we?

Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 2. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 6. Civilians are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 7. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilian objects and military objectives. Attacks may only be directed against military objectives. Attacks must not be directed against civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 8. In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose partial or total destruction, capture or neutralisation, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 9. Civilian objects are all objects that are not military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 10. Civilian objects are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they are military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 11. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 12. Indiscriminate attacks are those:

(a) which are not directed at a specific military objective;
(b) which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or
(c) which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by international humanitarian law;
and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction. [IAC/NIAC]​

Rule 13. Attacks by bombardment by any method or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 14. Launching an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated, is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 15. In the conduct of military operations, constant care must be taken to spare the civilian population, civilians and civilian objects. All feasible precautions must be taken to avoid, and in any event to minimise, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 16. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to verify that targets are military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 17. Each party to the conflict must take all feasible precautions in the choice of means and methods of warfare with a view to avoiding, and in any event to minimising, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 18. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to assess whether the attack may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 19. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to cancel or suspend an attack if it becomes apparent that the target is not a military objective or that the attack may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 20. Each party to the conflict must give effective advance warning of attacks which may affect the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 21. When a choice is possible between several military objectives for obtaining a similar military advantage, the objective to be selected must be that the attack on which may be expected to cause the least danger to civilian lives and to civilian objects. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 22. The parties to the conflict must take all feasible precautions to protect the civilian population and civilian objects under their control against the effects of attacks. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 23. Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 24. Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of military objectives. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 71. The use of weapons which are by nature indiscriminate is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 87. Civilians and persons hors de combat must be treated humanely. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 90. Torture, cruel or inhuman treatment and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 91. Corporal punishment is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 92. Mutilation, medical or scientific experiments or any other medical procedure not indicated by the state of health of the person concerned and not consistent with generally accepted medical standards are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 97. The use of human shields is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 106. Combatants must distinguish themselves from the civilian population while they are engaged in an attack or in a military operation preparatory to an attack. If they fail to do so, they do not have the right to prisoner-of-war status. [IAC]


Rule 113. Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 136. Children must not be recruited into armed forces or armed groups. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 137. Children must not be allowed to take part in hostilities. [IAC/NIAC]



Or does this law only apply to Jews?

Hey, tenderloin, you missed a post. Deliberately.

 

[Billo_Really]

The KKC isn't a real court but merely a private organization with no legal authority, established in a majority Muslim country (Malaysia) by an internationally recognized anti-Semite (Mahathir Mohamad).

You're right. It isn't a real court, it's a commission. Made up of experts in IHL. Their findings have no legal authority. But that's really a moot point, since Israel doesn't recognize any court of any kind. Just like nazi Germany, they think they can make up their own rules as they go along.

Their findings and press releases are equal to those of the KKK in America.

Not really. The KKK never conducted investigations on whether blacks in America were disenfranchised, or victims of hate crimes. They just hated blacks, because they weren't white.

The KKC, is investigating Israeli actions in regards to IHL. Big difference.

Global Research exposes its agenda and lack of credibility by pretending the KCC has any legal standing.

That's understandable. Since you don't have a valid argument with which to plead your case, discrediting the source is the only thing you have left.

 

[Billo_Really]

There was no international law in the OP.

But here's some for you:

International Humanitarian Law - Customary Law

Let's see which ones Hamas is violating, shall we?

Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 2. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 6. Civilians are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 7. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilian objects and military objectives. Attacks may only be directed against military objectives. Attacks must not be directed against civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 8. In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose partial or total destruction, capture or neutralisation, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 9. Civilian objects are all objects that are not military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 10. Civilian objects are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they are military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 11. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 12. Indiscriminate attacks are those:

(a) which are not directed at a specific military objective;
(b) which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or
(c) which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by international humanitarian law;
and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction. [IAC/NIAC]​

Rule 13. Attacks by bombardment by any method or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 14. Launching an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated, is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 15. In the conduct of military operations, constant care must be taken to spare the civilian population, civilians and civilian objects. All feasible precautions must be taken to avoid, and in any event to minimise, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 16. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to verify that targets are military objectives. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 17. Each party to the conflict must take all feasible precautions in the choice of means and methods of warfare with a view to avoiding, and in any event to minimising, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 18. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to assess whether the attack may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 19. Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to cancel or suspend an attack if it becomes apparent that the target is not a military objective or that the attack may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 20. Each party to the conflict must give effective advance warning of attacks which may affect the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 21. When a choice is possible between several military objectives for obtaining a similar military advantage, the objective to be selected must be that the attack on which may be expected to cause the least danger to civilian lives and to civilian objects. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 22. The parties to the conflict must take all feasible precautions to protect the civilian population and civilian objects under their control against the effects of attacks. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 23. Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 24. Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of military objectives. [IAC/arguably NIAC]

Rule 71. The use of weapons which are by nature indiscriminate is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 87. Civilians and persons hors de combat must be treated humanely. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 90. Torture, cruel or inhuman treatment and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 91. Corporal punishment is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 92. Mutilation, medical or scientific experiments or any other medical procedure not indicated by the state of health of the person concerned and not consistent with generally accepted medical standards are prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 97. The use of human shields is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 106. Combatants must distinguish themselves from the civilian population while they are engaged in an attack or in a military operation preparatory to an attack. If they fail to do so, they do not have the right to prisoner-of-war status. [IAC]


Rule 113. Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 136. Children must not be recruited into armed forces or armed groups. [IAC/NIAC]

Rule 137. Children must not be allowed to take part in hostilities. [IAC/NIAC]



Or does this law only apply to Jews?

Very good, Daveman, I'm impressed.

Rule 11 is the one they violate the most.

Israel violates all the others.

And it has nothing to do with jews, but everything to do with Israeli's.

 

[SAYIT]

The KKC isn't a real court but merely a private organization with no legal authority, established in a majority Muslim country (Malaysia) by an internationally recognized anti-Semite (Mahathir Mohamad).

You're right. It isn't a real court, it's a commission. Made up of experts in IHL. Their findings have no legal authority. But that's really a moot point, since Israel doesn't recognize any court of any kind. Just like nazi Germany, they think they can make up their own rules as they go along.

Their findings and press releases are equal to those of the KKK in America.

Not really. The KKK never conducted investigations on whether blacks in America were disenfranchised, or victims of hate crimes. They just hated blacks, because they weren't white.

The KKC, is investigating Israeli actions in regards to IHL. Big difference.

Global Research exposes its agenda and lack of credibility by pretending the KCC has any legal standing.

That's understandable. Since you don't have a valid argument with which to plead your case, discrediting the source is the only thing you have left.

I don't have to discredit that which has none, Princess, and could you post the "expert" credentials of the 8 tribunal members?

 

[irosie91]

from islamo nazi pig>>>
"if one takes the time to read the whole article by wiki, one will find that, by and large, most arabs and muslims reject mein kampf, thaat it sold a bit in ramallah (10 copies/week)"


ROFLMAL 'sold a bit' 10 copies per week---more than 500 per year-----'sold a bit' 500 copies per year probably exceeds the koran in that islamic shit hole--------come off it deach------500 copies per year is probably the entire sum of book sales in Ramallah

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v03XRpkCcG0]CNN: Radical Islam and the Nazis - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Billo_Really]

I don't have to discredit that which has none, Princess, and could you post the "expert" credentials of the 8 tribunal members?

You're not really qualified to even comment on their credentials, the only credentials you have, is that of an Israeli kiss-ass. Which, BTW, you're very good at. I will admit, you are an expert in sucking Israeli dick.

The 5-panel Commissioners’ is headed by Musa Ismail, a former Magistrate, who is currently a practicing lawyer. The other Commissioners include lecturer and author Prof Hans-Christof von Sponeck, who was also a former UN Assistant Secretary General responsible for humanitarian operations in Iraq, Nobel peace prize nominee Denis J. Halliday, who worked for the UN for 34 years and was head of the UN Humanitarian Programme in Iraq, Dr Zulaiha Ismail, former Dean of the Centre for Graduate Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) and currently actively involved with NGOs specifically on the plight of the Palestinians and lastly, Michel Chossudovsky, a professor of economics emeritus, University of Ottawa and Director, Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG).

The prosecution team for the commission hearing is lead by Prof Gurdial Singh Nijar, prominent law professor and author of several law publications. He is assisted by Prof Francis Boyle, Avtaran Singh and Gan Pei Fern.

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybaZgwTlMME]Former Hitler Youth Officer on Radical Islam... - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Billo_Really]

Former Hitler Youth Officer on Radical Islam... - YouTube

What is this? An homage to JStone? I miss that little prick!