Netanyahu Claims ‘Victory’ as Israel Isn’t Called to Join NPT

Israel can be trusted . After all they are an ally to the USA . 'iran, well they can't be trusted and they cause problems , terrorism worldwide .
USS Liberty Memorial
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
 
Israel self inspects their own nuclear arsenal.:eek:






I know! It's astonishing. Israel HAS he ability to destroy every Arab country around them....... and doesn't. And every Arab country around them WOULD destroy Israel if given the chance.
 
Israel self inspects their own nuclear arsenal.:eek:






I know! It's astonishing. Israel HAS he ability to destroy every Arab country around them....... and doesn't. And every Arab country around them WOULD destroy Israel if given the chance.
I don't agree...Westwall...if they made peace with the Palestinians,most of Israels problems would be over.......Palestine does not need other Arab countries,just a two-way street with Israel.
 
Israel can be trusted . After all they are an ally to the USA . 'iran, well they can't be trusted and they cause problems , terrorism worldwide .
USS Liberty Memorial
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve
 
Israel self inspects their own nuclear arsenal.:eek:






I know! It's astonishing. Israel HAS he ability to destroy every Arab country around them....... and doesn't. And every Arab country around them WOULD destroy Israel if given the chance.
I don't agree...Westwall...if they made peace with the Palestinians,most of Israels problems would be over.......Palestine does not need other Arab countries,just a two-way street with Israel.





Been tried and the Palestinians refuse unless their demands are met. And those demands are the mass murder of all the Jews and the destruction of Israel. So while that is the demands from the Palestinians then peace is a non event, to get the two way street the Palestinians have to realise what that means.
 
Israel can be trusted . After all they are an ally to the USA . 'iran, well they can't be trusted and they cause problems , terrorism worldwide .
USS Liberty Memorial
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve





Nothing at all, but it is brought up every time it is shown that the Palestinians are evil bastards that should be put down
 
Israel can be trusted . After all they are an ally to the USA . 'iran, well they can't be trusted and they cause problems , terrorism worldwide .
USS Liberty Memorial
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve





Nothing at all, but it is brought up every time it is shown that the Palestinians are evil bastards that should be put down

Define "evil bastard".
 
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve





Nothing at all, but it is brought up every time it is shown that the Palestinians are evil bastards that should be put down

Define "evil bastard".




Typical islamonazi terrorists that sees the mass murder of children as a right handed to them by their moon god
 
Iran is sworn to destroy the West. Nothing else need be considered.

And the US is destroying the Middle East, see the difference? One is, the other says it wants to. Which is worse?




Just how is America destroying the M.E. when the arab muslims have already destroyed it ?

Hmm, let's see. Taking down Saddam, making a political vacuum. Why was Saddam in place? Oh, because the British made Iraq with a Saudi in as king, great idea.

Whatever Muslims are doing there, often it's as a result of the policies the west have implemented in the first place. But hey, you can ignore that stuff right?
 
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve





Nothing at all, but it is brought up every time it is shown that the Palestinians are evil bastards that should be put down

Define "evil bastard".




Typical islamonazi terrorists that sees the mass murder of children as a right handed to them by their moon god

There seem to be a lot of posts like this. You say something that someone doesn't agree with, instead of talking about the issue they merely say something like "Typical blah blah fascist blah blah" and that's all you get.

As if an attack is debate.
 
Iran is sworn to destroy the West. Nothing else need be considered.

And the US is destroying the Middle East, see the difference? One is, the other says it wants to. Which is worse?




Just how is America destroying the M.E. when the arab muslims have already destroyed it ?

Hmm, let's see. Taking down Saddam, making a political vacuum. Why was Saddam in place? Oh, because the British made Iraq with a Saudi in as king, great idea.

Whatever Muslims are doing there, often it's as a result of the policies the west have implemented in the first place. But hey, you can ignore that stuff right?




Maybe you should research your history a little more as Britain did not make Iraq that was the LoN and France. And it was Syria and Jordan that had the Saudi princes made into kings, Iraq was ruled by a native.

So the west forced 1400 years of mass murder, rape and violence on the indigenous peoples of the M.E did they, or is it you denying the reality of the M.E because it does not suit your islamonazi propaganda ?
 
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve





Nothing at all, but it is brought up every time it is shown that the Palestinians are evil bastards that should be put down

Define "evil bastard".




Typical islamonazi terrorists that sees the mass murder of children as a right handed to them by their moon god

There seem to be a lot of posts like this. You say something that someone doesn't agree with, instead of talking about the issue they merely say something like "Typical blah blah fascist blah blah" and that's all you get.

As if an attack is debate.



Are you denying that islam breeds violence and preaches it as part of the religion. Just look at the koran and read how many times muslims are commanded to " KILL THE UNBELIEVERS "
 
Iran is sworn to destroy the West. Nothing else need be considered.

And the US is destroying the Middle East, see the difference? One is, the other says it wants to. Which is worse?




Just how is America destroying the M.E. when the arab muslims have already destroyed it ?

Hmm, let's see. Taking down Saddam, making a political vacuum. Why was Saddam in place? Oh, because the British made Iraq with a Saudi in as king, great idea.

Whatever Muslims are doing there, often it's as a result of the policies the west have implemented in the first place. But hey, you can ignore that stuff right?




Maybe you should research your history a little more as Britain did not make Iraq that was the LoN and France. And it was Syria and Jordan that had the Saudi princes made into kings, Iraq was ruled by a native.

So the west forced 1400 years of mass murder, rape and violence on the indigenous peoples of the M.E did they, or is it you denying the reality of the M.E because it does not suit your islamonazi propaganda ?

Er.....

The League of Nations gave Britain a mandate in 1920. Then there was a revolt and the mandate was scrapped with a British administered semi-independent nation put in place. The Anglo-Iraqi Treaty was signed by Britain and Iraq which gave this semi-independence except in foreign affairs and military affairs. Then another treaty in 1930 was signed. Then Iraq gained independence in 1932.

The League of Nations basically acted on behalf of the French and British who carved up the old Ottoman Empire. To suggest the League of Nations did something is like saying the UN invaded Iraq in 2003.

Iraq was ruled by the Hashemites, who controlled Mecca, which happens to be in Saudi Arabia.

In 1932 King Faisal I of Iraq was in charge and had been since 1921. (well, in charge in as much as it was the british). He was born in Mecca. Died in Switzerland. Grew up in Istanbul. Hardly Iraqi, was he?
 
Iran is sworn to destroy the West. Nothing else need be considered.

And the US is destroying the Middle East, see the difference? One is, the other says it wants to. Which is worse?




Just how is America destroying the M.E. when the arab muslims have already destroyed it ?

Hmm, let's see. Taking down Saddam, making a political vacuum. Why was Saddam in place? Oh, because the British made Iraq with a Saudi in as king, great idea.

Whatever Muslims are doing there, often it's as a result of the policies the west have implemented in the first place. But hey, you can ignore that stuff right?




Maybe you should research your history a little more as Britain did not make Iraq that was the LoN and France. And it was Syria and Jordan that had the Saudi princes made into kings, Iraq was ruled by a native.

So the west forced 1400 years of mass murder, rape and violence on the indigenous peoples of the M.E did they, or is it you denying the reality of the M.E because it does not suit your islamonazi propaganda ?

Er.....

The League of Nations gave Britain a mandate in 1920. Then there was a revolt and the mandate was scrapped with a British administered semi-independent nation put in place. The Anglo-Iraqi Treaty was signed by Britain and Iraq which gave this semi-independence except in foreign affairs and military affairs. Then another treaty in 1930 was signed. Then Iraq gained independence in 1932.

The League of Nations basically acted on behalf of the French and British who carved up the old Ottoman Empire. To suggest the League of Nations did something is like saying the UN invaded Iraq in 2003.

Iraq was ruled by the Hashemites, who controlled Mecca, which happens to be in Saudi Arabia.

In 1932 King Faisal I of Iraq was in charge and had been since 1921. (well, in charge in as much as it was the british). He was born in Mecca. Died in Switzerland. Grew up in Istanbul. Hardly Iraqi, was he?





ER........

NO the mandate was not scrapped at all it transferred to the UN, and Britain did everything it could to stop the Jews from declaring free determination. The Jews waited until Britain had thrown in the towel and then declared the state of Israel under the terms of the mandate of Palestine.
Iraq was granted their independence under the 1921 mandates and Britain had no say in anything if you read the terms of the mandate, and it was a class A mandate needing no interference to set up a viable government. All the Anglo-Iraq treaty did was allow for local self government
The LoN was autonomous and was not the tool of anyone shown when Britain tried to alter the terms of the mandate to suit the arab muslims and the LoN said no.


The UN responded to Iraqi warmongering and sent a task force to Iraq to settle the matter once and for all. So the Americans and British invaded Iraq not the UN.


Now what has this to do with Israel not being forced against INTERNATIONAL LAW to join the NPT ?
 
The NPT is a voluntary Treaty, that Iran signed, and Israel didn't.

Nations that sign get stuff for signing, like help with their nuclear energy programs.

Israel, surrounded by muslims states didn't need energy, they needed bombs.

Iran, with it's complete lack of energy resources signed.

Errr...., ummm, o_O
 
Israel self inspects their own nuclear arsenal.:eek:






I know! It's astonishing. Israel HAS he ability to destroy every Arab country around them....... and doesn't. And every Arab country around them WOULD destroy Israel if given the chance.
I don't agree...Westwall...if they made peace with the Palestinians,most of Israels problems would be over.......Palestine does not need other Arab countries,just a two-way street with Israel.

Bzzzzz wrong! All the attacks and wars Israel engaged in were never to because of this so called Palestine. You are historically ignorant.
 
Israel can be trusted . After all they are an ally to the USA . 'iran, well they can't be trusted and they cause problems , terrorism worldwide .
USS Liberty Memorial
Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hold on there, why do you care about the USS Liberty so much to begin with?
Liberty is part of the repetitive canards Jew haters resort to. They have nothing but this constant debunked bullcrap.
Excuse my ignorance Roudy......what has the USS Liberty Memorial to do with Jewish folk.......?steve

The Liberty is always brought up by Jew haters as why "Jews can't be trusted" and "Israel isn't our ally", as it was once again in this case. You're excused.
 

Forum List

Back
Top