Nature Sets Limits....

[2aguy]

George Will has done some excellent works.

This one is a bear of a book....nearly 600 pages, and I'm reading two fiction works at the same time.....really have to portion my time. That's why I have to stay off the board for an hour at a time.

But, like you....I love books.

George lost his mind when Trump was elected....the guy who would rather the bully kick sand in his face than to stand up and fight back, thinking standing on the principal of not engaging a bully was better than stopping the sand in his underwear....

Yup....a Never-Trumper.


Book is still worth reading.

Yeah...smart guy, just a cake eater.....not a fighter......as Dan Proft, a local radio host in Chicago would say....

I'm gonna construct some OPs based on Will's book.....bet you won't have any problem with 'em.

No....it was just annoying having to listen to Will and others complain about Trump, when the only alternative was hilary....someone who actually sold state secrets to China, and strategic resources to Russia.....and yet Trump was the problem...

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. To see how important it is for the Left to erase God, and religion, just see how strongly Darwin’s theory is pushed in school….pretty much as a proven fact, a law, not just a theory….and a disproven one at that.

The universal common ancestry of all living things, all had a single common ancestor way back in the distant past..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

But….

If Darwin was correct, the geological stockpile should provide examples of organisms with a partial accumulation of said new traits and features, but not complete enough to have quite made it into the menagerie of life. Although they didn't produce new lines of living things, these 'attempts' would be preserved as fossils.

"By macro-mutation I mean a considerable hunk of DNA that contains more than one gene....All macro-mutations have drastic effects on development, most are lethal. "
http://www.richardcfrancis.com/2012/06/10/genetic-dark-matter-part-2/





11. For Darwin to be correct, simple forms must necessarily have originated before more complex ones.

Yet today, we find many cases of the sudden emergence of new and complex forms without the predicted lead-up via simpler ones.



What is hidden from students is Darwin’s admission of this fact:

"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection."
Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302



It seems that the only place we find no limits is the lies of the Left.
Evidence disproves both Darwin's theory, and Karl Marx's.

You wouldn't know that from government school.......

 

[PoliticalChic]

This one is a bear of a book....nearly 600 pages, and I'm reading two fiction works at the same time.....really have to portion my time. That's why I have to stay off the board for an hour at a time.

But, like you....I love books.

George lost his mind when Trump was elected....the guy who would rather the bully kick sand in his face than to stand up and fight back, thinking standing on the principal of not engaging a bully was better than stopping the sand in his underwear....

Yup....a Never-Trumper.


Book is still worth reading.

Yeah...smart guy, just a cake eater.....not a fighter......as Dan Proft, a local radio host in Chicago would say....

I'm gonna construct some OPs based on Will's book.....bet you won't have any problem with 'em.

No....it was just annoying having to listen to Will and others complain about Trump, when the only alternative was hilary....someone who actually sold state secrets to China, and strategic resources to Russia.....and yet Trump was the problem...

Just turn it off....I do.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

How about you put a little effort into your posts, and produce a documented, supported, and cogent reply?


Is that beyond your side to do?

Is that because you guys went to government school?

I told you they are primitives with limited capacity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

How about you put a little effort into your posts, and produce a documented, supported, and cogent reply?


Is that beyond your side to do?

Is that because you guys went to government school?

I told you they are primitives with limited capacity.

And Coulter said this:

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"

 

[Norman]

.....but Liberals don't understand that.


The greatest President in a hundred years said “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” So many of the doctrines and predictions on which Progressive/Liberal beliefs are built…..aren’t so.


1.With the Enlightenment came the view that mankind can do anything, can know everything, and is without limits in relation to the universe.

It gave rise to the French Revolution, and the end of religion as no longer useful: man became God. And no matter where and how often the idea came to chaos and destruction…..it persists today as communism, Progressivism, socialism, and Liberalism.




2.“April 13, 1798, was a Friday. But it was springtime in revolutionary Paris, meaning that under the Directory’s new calendar it was the twenty-forth day of the month of Germinal in the Year Six, and the next day of rest was still six days distant, not two.

Has any reform been more futile? The Government’s arrogant discard of Christianity means that weeks have been extended to ten days instead of seven. The revision’s intent is to supplant the papal calendar with a uniform alternative of twelve months of thirty days each, based on the system of ancient Egypt.

Bibles themselves were torn up to make paper gun cartridges in the grim days of 1793, and now the biblical week has been guillotined, each month instead divided into three decades of ten days, with the year, with the year beginning at the autumn equinox and five to six holidays added to balance idealism with our solar orbit. Not content with regimenting the calendar, the government has introduced a new metric system for weight and measure.

There are even proposals for a new clock of precisely 100,000 seconds each day. Reason, reason!...The new calendar is the kind of logical idea imposed by clever people that completely ignores habit, emotion, and human nature and thus forecasts the Revolution’s doom.


Your colonial revolution was one of political independence. This one in France is about the very order of life. My God, a king guillotined! Thousands sent to slaughter! Wars unleashed on every French border! Atheism enshrined! Church lands seized, debts ignored, estates confiscated, rabbles armed, riots, anarchy, and tyranny!” From the novel “Napoleon’ Pyramids,” by William Dietrich


3. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…”
Bolshevik Festivals, 1917–1920



4. When reason and science became the replacement for religion and morality, one of the limits on mankind had been reached. How many times must we realize that science can tell us what we can do, not what we should do?

5. When religion was attacked and terror became government policy, in the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh



Shouldn’t this have been an indication on mankind’s limitations, a warning?

These people think there are 79 genders. Your list is irrelevant.

Everyone knows, they don't care. What is left is dealing with them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

.....but Liberals don't understand that.


The greatest President in a hundred years said “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” So many of the doctrines and predictions on which Progressive/Liberal beliefs are built…..aren’t so.


1.With the Enlightenment came the view that mankind can do anything, can know everything, and is without limits in relation to the universe.

It gave rise to the French Revolution, and the end of religion as no longer useful: man became God. And no matter where and how often the idea came to chaos and destruction…..it persists today as communism, Progressivism, socialism, and Liberalism.




2.“April 13, 1798, was a Friday. But it was springtime in revolutionary Paris, meaning that under the Directory’s new calendar it was the twenty-forth day of the month of Germinal in the Year Six, and the next day of rest was still six days distant, not two.

Has any reform been more futile? The Government’s arrogant discard of Christianity means that weeks have been extended to ten days instead of seven. The revision’s intent is to supplant the papal calendar with a uniform alternative of twelve months of thirty days each, based on the system of ancient Egypt.

Bibles themselves were torn up to make paper gun cartridges in the grim days of 1793, and now the biblical week has been guillotined, each month instead divided into three decades of ten days, with the year, with the year beginning at the autumn equinox and five to six holidays added to balance idealism with our solar orbit. Not content with regimenting the calendar, the government has introduced a new metric system for weight and measure.

There are even proposals for a new clock of precisely 100,000 seconds each day. Reason, reason!...The new calendar is the kind of logical idea imposed by clever people that completely ignores habit, emotion, and human nature and thus forecasts the Revolution’s doom.


Your colonial revolution was one of political independence. This one in France is about the very order of life. My God, a king guillotined! Thousands sent to slaughter! Wars unleashed on every French border! Atheism enshrined! Church lands seized, debts ignored, estates confiscated, rabbles armed, riots, anarchy, and tyranny!” From the novel “Napoleon’ Pyramids,” by William Dietrich


3. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…”
Bolshevik Festivals, 1917–1920



4. When reason and science became the replacement for religion and morality, one of the limits on mankind had been reached. How many times must we realize that science can tell us what we can do, not what we should do?

5. When religion was attacked and terror became government policy, in the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh



Shouldn’t this have been an indication on mankind’s limitations, a warning?

These people think there are 79 genders. Your list is irrelevant.

Everyone knows, they don't care. What is left is dealing with them.

Sorry, Norm....it's not clear what, exactly, your point is.

What list?

Who is 'everyone'?

Who doesn't care?

What should be done vis-a-vis 'dealing with them'?

 

[PoliticalChic]

12. Evidence disproves both Darwin's theory, and Karl Marx's.
Yup…..evidence of the sudden appearance of new and unexpected structures and organisms.


a. Cambrian: "Some of these animals have mineralized exoskeletons, including those representing phyla, such as echinoderms, brachiopods, and arthropods, and each represent clearly distinct and novel body plans."
Meyers, "Darwin's Doubt," p. 34.


b.How about the sudden.....sudden....appearance of vertebrates in the Cambrian?? No gradual accretion of new characteristics as per Darwin....
In 1999, paleontologists in Southern China also found fossil remains of fish in the Cambrian period. Fish are vertebrates, members of the phylum chordata.
Shu, et. al., "Lower Cambrian Vertebrates in Southern China" (Haikouichthy) Evidence for a single median fin-fold and tail in the Lower Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys ercaicunensis - Zhang - 2004 - Journal of Evolutionary Biology - Wiley Online Library



c. More evidence: Opabinia- 15 articulated body segments, 28 gills, 30 flipper-like swimming lobes, long trunk-like proboscis, intricate nervous system...and five separate eyes!
".... found in the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale..."
Opabinia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia



d. "The Chengjiang fauna makes the Cambrian explosion more difficult to reconcile with the Darwinian view for yet another reason. The Chengjiang discoveries intensify the top-down pattern of appearances in which individual representatives of the higher taxonomic categories (phyla, subphyla, and clalisses) appear and only later diversify into the lower taxonomic categories (families, genera, and species).
Meyer, "Darwin's Doubt," p.74

The sudden appearance of complex organism.....followed by simpler. The reverse of Darwin’s theory.





Sooo….without Darwin, what is the explanation for life on earth, the order of species formation, the lack of predicted relationships…..

No answer?

No Darwnian change from one species into another has ever.....EVER.....been seen or documented in nature or in any laboratory.
There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.

More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings.







Nature has set a limit on how much any species can change, well before it becomes another species.

History proves pretty much the same sort of limit on any success communism, socialism, Nazism….or Liberalism,…can attain.


Seems government school grads can’t recognize that.

 

[WillPower]

The author made the point that Conservatives don't believe you can change fundamental human nature, but you can effect behavior.......left wingers don't believe you can control behavior, so you must completely change human nature.....which is why they fail every time, and end up filling mass graves with innocent men, women and children.

Which reinforces the point that Pelousy & Co. are indeed communists by ignoring the horror her invaders have brought to ordinary Americans. Thousands of robberies, rapes, and murders and she and her ilk has yet to meet an Angel Mother of their victims. She simply doesn't care as long as her agenda continues of allowing us to be overrun in the hope the invaders can be turned into commiecrat voters to replace the white working class votes Trump took from her party. Theirs is an agenda that was hatched 40 years ago to take over the government schools and universities, promote a lifestyle of perversion and abortion, and look the other way while our jobs went overseas and our factories closed thanks to their hideous departmental regulations never made law by Congress. They have no qualms about violence to gain power.....Pelousy actually defended MS-13 when Trump called them animals. They'll encourage black and hispanic rioting next summer if they can't impeach Trump before then. We are in a civil war right now for the heart and soul of our Nation.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

that is exactly what I think of you and conservatives.


I believe gays should be accepted in society (and not ostracized, discriminated against or bullied) because

(watch out bozo....rational thought is coming)

1. their homosexuality is nobody's business but their own.
2. their homosexuality doesn't affect YOU or anyone else.
3. they fkn exist and they have always existed.
4. there is no rational or logical reason to abuse gays simply because they are gay.
5. they deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, including marriage, spousal rights and job protection.
6. most gays are decent and honorable people, better people than most conservatives.

since your response is "but I am a fkn conservative snowflake and homosexuality angers me.....and god..."

don't bother.


Pot should be legal because

1. is it no more dangerous than beer
2. we don't want a nanny state
3. people should be free to choose for themselves.

Religion should NOT be "indoctrinated" in public schools because

1. nobody has the right to brainwash OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN with ANY religion.

Since your arguments are all "liberals are primitives with limited capacity rational thought" (proving you have NO capacity for rational thought) and all you respond with is "fuk you libshit..." or words to that effect....

you might as well just admit I used RATIONAL THOUGHT and you've got nada....

have I ever mentioned that the blues suck?

Blues is for people who are incapable of rational thought.

try some THOUGHT PROVING music....like angel vivaldi....or andy james.....

I'm sure it is far beyond your limited musical and intellectual capacity.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

that is exactly what I think of you and conservatives.


I believe gays should be accepted in society (and not ostracized, discriminated against or bullied) because

(watch out bozo....rational thought is coming)

1. their homosexuality is nobody's business but their own.
2. their homosexuality doesn't affect YOU or anyone else.
3. they fkn exist and they have always existed.
4. there is no rational or logical reason to abuse gays simply because they are gay.
5. they deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, including marriage, spousal rights and job protection.
6. most gays are decent and honorable people, better people than most conservatives.

since your response is "but I am a fkn conservative snowflake and homosexuality angers me.....and god..."

don't bother.


Pot should be legal because

1. is it no more dangerous than beer
2. we don't want a nanny state
3. people should be free to choose for themselves.

Religion should NOT be "indoctrinated" in public schools because

1. nobody has the right to brainwash OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN with ANY religion.

Since your arguments are all "liberals are primitives with limited capacity rational thought" (proving you have NO capacity for rational thought) and all you respond with is "fuk you libshit..." or words to that effect....

you might as well just admit I used RATIONAL THOUGHT and you've got nada....

have I ever mentioned that the blues suck?

Blues is for people who are incapable of rational thought.

try some THOUGHT PROVING music....like angel vivaldi....or andy james.....

I'm sure it is far beyond your limited musical and intellectual capacity.....

And here we see proof of
a. the indoctrination provided by government schooling
and
b. the inability to see beyond personal pleasure


This is the Democrat voter, writ large.

 

[rightwinger]

Thank Goodness we have Liberals in our society

They are the only ones concerned with fairness and making our world better

 

[M14 Shooter]

Nature really has just one rule:
Work, or die.

Liberals think they can change this.

 

[rightwinger]

Nature really has just one rule:
Work, or die.

Liberals think they can change this.

Liberals realize we function as a society and not survival of the fittest

Thank Goodness we have liberals in our society

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

that is exactly what I think of you and conservatives.


I believe gays should be accepted in society (and not ostracized, discriminated against or bullied) because

(watch out bozo....rational thought is coming)

1. their homosexuality is nobody's business but their own.
2. their homosexuality doesn't affect YOU or anyone else.
3. they fkn exist and they have always existed.
4. there is no rational or logical reason to abuse gays simply because they are gay.
5. they deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, including marriage, spousal rights and job protection.
6. most gays are decent and honorable people, better people than most conservatives.

since your response is "but I am a fkn conservative snowflake and homosexuality angers me.....and god..."

don't bother.


Pot should be legal because

1. is it no more dangerous than beer
2. we don't want a nanny state
3. people should be free to choose for themselves.

Religion should NOT be "indoctrinated" in public schools because

1. nobody has the right to brainwash OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN with ANY religion.

Since your arguments are all "liberals are primitives with limited capacity rational thought" (proving you have NO capacity for rational thought) and all you respond with is "fuk you libshit..." or words to that effect....

you might as well just admit I used RATIONAL THOUGHT and you've got nada....

have I ever mentioned that the blues suck?

Blues is for people who are incapable of rational thought.

try some THOUGHT PROVING music....like angel vivaldi....or andy james.....

I'm sure it is far beyond your limited musical and intellectual capacity.....

^^^ and here we have proof of the limited capacity of liberal primitives. Your 'gay' argument is 50 years out of date with respect to Republicans. A parroted liberal drone talking point not updated since 1972 like the rest of your parroted nonsense. Do you have any original thoughts?

Fine, why don't you explain a more recent gay issue like how California black and Hispanic Democrats voted to ban gay marriage in California and how you liberal primitives who claim to champion popular votes ran to the courts to overturn the result of that popular vote. No? lol

As for music lib primitive please, one of us spent the weekend studying/playing Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue, it wasn't you. The 5 Browns heard of them? Steinway & Sons? Juilliard? Bah, I laugh in your general direction.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

that is exactly what I think of you and conservatives.


I believe gays should be accepted in society (and not ostracized, discriminated against or bullied) because

(watch out bozo....rational thought is coming)

1. their homosexuality is nobody's business but their own.
2. their homosexuality doesn't affect YOU or anyone else.
3. they fkn exist and they have always existed.
4. there is no rational or logical reason to abuse gays simply because they are gay.
5. they deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, including marriage, spousal rights and job protection.
6. most gays are decent and honorable people, better people than most conservatives.

since your response is "but I am a fkn conservative snowflake and homosexuality angers me.....and god..."

don't bother.


Pot should be legal because

1. is it no more dangerous than beer
2. we don't want a nanny state
3. people should be free to choose for themselves.

Religion should NOT be "indoctrinated" in public schools because

1. nobody has the right to brainwash OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN with ANY religion.

Since your arguments are all "liberals are primitives with limited capacity rational thought" (proving you have NO capacity for rational thought) and all you respond with is "fuk you libshit..." or words to that effect....

you might as well just admit I used RATIONAL THOUGHT and you've got nada....

have I ever mentioned that the blues suck?

Blues is for people who are incapable of rational thought.

try some THOUGHT PROVING music....like angel vivaldi....or andy james.....

I'm sure it is far beyond your limited musical and intellectual capacity.....

And here we see proof of
a. the indoctrination provided by government schooling
and
b. the inability to see beyond personal pleasure


This is the Democrat voter, writ large.

I took a few minutes to destroy his 50 year old talking points using only the intellect in my left pinky, that's all it required.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

that is exactly what I think of you and conservatives.


I believe gays should be accepted in society (and not ostracized, discriminated against or bullied) because

(watch out bozo....rational thought is coming)

1. their homosexuality is nobody's business but their own.
2. their homosexuality doesn't affect YOU or anyone else.
3. they fkn exist and they have always existed.
4. there is no rational or logical reason to abuse gays simply because they are gay.
5. they deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, including marriage, spousal rights and job protection.
6. most gays are decent and honorable people, better people than most conservatives.

since your response is "but I am a fkn conservative snowflake and homosexuality angers me.....and god..."

don't bother.


Pot should be legal because

1. is it no more dangerous than beer
2. we don't want a nanny state
3. people should be free to choose for themselves.

Religion should NOT be "indoctrinated" in public schools because

1. nobody has the right to brainwash OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN with ANY religion.

Since your arguments are all "liberals are primitives with limited capacity rational thought" (proving you have NO capacity for rational thought) and all you respond with is "fuk you libshit..." or words to that effect....

you might as well just admit I used RATIONAL THOUGHT and you've got nada....

have I ever mentioned that the blues suck?

Blues is for people who are incapable of rational thought.

try some THOUGHT PROVING music....like angel vivaldi....or andy james.....

I'm sure it is far beyond your limited musical and intellectual capacity.....

And here we see proof of
a. the indoctrination provided by government schooling
and
b. the inability to see beyond personal pleasure


This is the Democrat voter, writ large.

I took a few minutes to destroy his 50 year old talking points using only the intellect in my left pinky, that's all it required.

That one is an embarrassment to the side he imagines he belongs to.
That's why I like it when he posts.


All the best to your pinky.

 

[rightwinger]

All that is good and great in this country can be attributed to Liberals