Nature Sets Limits....

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
.....but Liberals don't understand that.


The greatest President in a hundred years said “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” So many of the doctrines and predictions on which Progressive/Liberal beliefs are built…..aren’t so.


1.With the Enlightenment came the view that mankind can do anything, can know everything, and is without limits in relation to the universe.

It gave rise to the French Revolution, and the end of religion as no longer useful: man became God. And no matter where and how often the idea came to chaos and destruction…..it persists today as communism, Progressivism, socialism, and Liberalism.




2.“April 13, 1798, was a Friday. But it was springtime in revolutionary Paris, meaning that under the Directory’s new calendar it was the twenty-forth day of the month of Germinal in the Year Six, and the next day of rest was still six days distant, not two.

Has any reform been more futile? The Government’s arrogant discard of Christianity means that weeks have been extended to ten days instead of seven. The revision’s intent is to supplant the papal calendar with a uniform alternative of twelve months of thirty days each, based on the system of ancient Egypt.

Bibles themselves were torn up to make paper gun cartridges in the grim days of 1793, and now the biblical week has been guillotined, each month instead divided into three decades of ten days, with the year, with the year beginning at the autumn equinox and five to six holidays added to balance idealism with our solar orbit. Not content with regimenting the calendar, the government has introduced a new metric system for weight and measure.

There are even proposals for a new clock of precisely 100,000 seconds each day. Reason, reason!...The new calendar is the kind of logical idea imposed by clever people that completely ignores habit, emotion, and human nature and thus forecasts the Revolution’s doom.


Your colonial revolution was one of political independence. This one in France is about the very order of life. My God, a king guillotined! Thousands sent to slaughter! Wars unleashed on every French border! Atheism enshrined! Church lands seized, debts ignored, estates confiscated, rabbles armed, riots, anarchy, and tyranny!” From the novel “Napoleon’ Pyramids,” by William Dietrich


3. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…”
Bolshevik Festivals, 1917–1920



4. When reason and science became the replacement for religion and morality, one of the limits on mankind had been reached. How many times must we realize that science can tell us what we can do, not what we should do?

5. When religion was attacked and terror became government policy, in the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh



Shouldn’t this have been an indication on mankind’s limitations, a warning?
 
Last edited:
Being something like 1,500 miles of ocean water away from what you’re rebelling against was probably a contributing factor to the lesser bloodshed of the American Revolution.

Damn you’re dumb
 
Liberals = Bad

We get it NorthKoreaChic, No need to start yet another thread about it. Get some help.
 
Being something like 1,500 miles of ocean water away from what you’re rebelling against was probably a contributing factor to the lesser bloodshed of the American Revolution.

Damn you’re dumb


I understand your .....'condition'......and I can help.


The French Revolution occurred almost simultaneously with the American Revolution. While sharing many similarities, there was one glaring difference. The French were not Christian and attempted to introduce a godless humanistic government. The result is amply recorded in history books. Instead of the liberty, justice, peace, happiness, and prosperity experienced in America, France suffered chaos and injustice as thousands of heads rolled under the sharp blade of the guillotine.”
Religion and Government in America: Are they complementary? — The Mandate



"...a godless humanistic government."

Democrats of an earlier time.

An American party that had concentration camps for it's citizens
 
Being something like 1,500 miles of ocean water away from what you’re rebelling against was probably a contributing factor to the lesser bloodshed of the American Revolution.

Damn you’re dumb


The Brits were concentrating on the French you're the ignorant one
 
Last edited:
Being something like 1,500 miles of ocean water away from what you’re rebelling against was probably a contributing factor to the lesser bloodshed of the American Revolution.

Damn you’re dumb
Now that's my favorite baby killer! Her whole post went right over you tiny twisted head!
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....
The left's unwillingness or inability to accept the limits of human nature are at the root of their century-long efforts to establish their global "Worker's Paradise."

They don't know or don't care about the death and destruction it has foisted on humanity … they only know they want "free" stuff - stuff paid for by others, of course - and they want it NOW!!

Mass killings under communist regimes - Wikipedia
 
Being something like 1,500 miles of ocean water away from what you’re rebelling against was probably a contributing factor to the lesser bloodshed of the American Revolution.

Damn you’re dumb

Wrong..... the French Revolution started murdering people for the slightest offense...... that very well could have happened here, but for the difference in culture between the colonists and the French......
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....
The left's unwillingness or inability to accept the limits of human nature are at the root of their century-long efforts to establish their global "Worker's Paradise."

They don't know or don't care about the death and destruction it has foisted on humanity … they only know they want "free" stuff - stuff paid for by others, of course - and they want it NOW!!

Mass killings under communist regimes - Wikipedia



There is this admission.....

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic."
Joseph Stalin



And here there very same view from one of the regular lying Leftist posters on this board:

When I pointed out that his antecedents, the communists, slaughtered 100 million men, women and children.....he sneered at the deaths this way:


"Sure it wasn't 100 billion?"
FDR Admiration Society
FDR Admiration Society
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....


There was a neat little book called the Politics of Star Trek....I know, but it was interesting in how it looked at episodes of the series and the philosophy you find in them....

The author made the point that Conservatives don't believe you can change fundamental human nature, but you can effect behavior.......left wingers don't believe you can control behavior, so you must completely change human nature.....which is why they fail every time, and end up filling mass graves with innocent men, women and children.
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....


There was a neat little book called the Politics of Star Trek....I know, but it was interesting in how it looked at episodes of the series and the philosophy you find in them....

The author made the point that Conservatives don't believe you can change fundamental human nature, but you can effect behavior.......left wingers don't believe you can control behavior, so you must completely change human nature.....which is why they fail every time, and end up filling mass graves with innocent men, women and children.


In October 1919, Lenin paid a secret visit to the laboratory of the great physiologist I. P. Pavlov, a Russian physiologist known chiefly for the concept of the conditioned reflex. In his classic experiment, he found that a hungry dog can be trained to associate the sound of a bell with food and will salivate at the sound even in the absence of food.

Lenin wanted to find out if his work on the conditional reflexes of the brain might help the Bolsheviks control European behaviour.
“I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained.

Pavlov was astounded
. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardise the population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly” replied Lenin. Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.”…
Orlando Figes, "A People's Tragedy," p.732-733



That is the way Communists, Progressives, Liberals want their citizens trained.......or killed.

 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....
The left's unwillingness or inability to accept the limits of human nature are at the root of their century-long efforts to establish their global "Worker's Paradise."

They don't know or don't care about the death and destruction it has foisted on humanity … they only know they want "free" stuff - stuff paid for by others, of course - and they want it NOW!!

Mass killings under communist regimes - Wikipedia



There is this admission.....

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic."
Joseph Stalin



And here there very same view from one of the regular lying Leftist posters on this board:

When I pointed out that his antecedents, the communists, slaughtered 100 million men, women and children.....he sneered at the deaths this way:


"Sure it wasn't 100 billion?"
FDR Admiration Society
FDR Admiration Society
Evidently at least some of the 2020 Dem hopefuls know that being tagged a socialist is not good for their electoral chances. I notice Liz Warren has repeatedly claimed she and her proposals are not socialist but I can't imagine anyone other than her lemmings buy her denials, nor can I imagine the Repubs will just let it slide.

Never Trumper: I'll vote for almost any Democrat, but lurching left won't beat Trump
 
6. Is there a nature inherent in all human beings, a ‘human nature’?

Is it simply a social construct, malleable and flexible, to be altered according to the type of laws and government in effect?

Or, is this also one of the limitations that nature imposes?






“What was, however, distinctive to American progressives early in the twentieth century was the sweep of their serene confidence that science, including and especially political science, now enabled the benevolent control of “life”- all of it.
…one impediment had to be removed. Human life could not be made sufficiently malleable until human beings we disabused of the idea of human nature. The philosophy of natural right…the Republic’s foundation, rests on one premise: There is a universal human nature.

Progressivism rests on….a heroic negative….the idea that human beings are essentially blank slates on which pretty much anything can be written…”
George Will, ”The Conservative Sensibility,” p. 35



Liberals, Progressives, Democrats…..still out to prove that.


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


Human reconstruction….the belief that there is no inherent, immutable, human nature.
They need to believe it or there can be no Progressivism, no Liberalism.....
The left's unwillingness or inability to accept the limits of human nature are at the root of their century-long efforts to establish their global "Worker's Paradise."

They don't know or don't care about the death and destruction it has foisted on humanity … they only know they want "free" stuff - stuff paid for by others, of course - and they want it NOW!!

Mass killings under communist regimes - Wikipedia



There is this admission.....

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic."
Joseph Stalin



And here there very same view from one of the regular lying Leftist posters on this board:

When I pointed out that his antecedents, the communists, slaughtered 100 million men, women and children.....he sneered at the deaths this way:


"Sure it wasn't 100 billion?"
FDR Admiration Society
FDR Admiration Society
Evidently at least some of the 2020 Dem hopefuls know that being tagged a socialist is not good for their electoral chances. I notice Liz Warren has repeatedly claimed she and her proposals are not socialist but I can't imagine anyone other than her lemmings buy her denials, nor can I imagine the Repubs will just let it slide.

Never Trumper: I'll vote for almost any Democrat, but lurching left won't beat Trump



That's why the Establishment Democrats are pushing the dunce, Biden.

We need a Reagan-style landslide to shock the Democrat Party back to their senses and away from this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
 
Liberals are primitives with limited capacity for rational thought.

KenobiIronyMeters.jpeg
 
“Human nature is the one constant through human history. It is always there.” --Thucydides



7. Nature imposes limits on what man can do. Communism was based on changing human nature, as is Liberalism and Progressivism.

Try though they might, gulags, murder, mental institution….none of it changed human nature.




In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR



Yet Bernie Sanders, Communist, is a Democrat front-runner.
 
8. The Founders made their belief known, with four references to The Divine in the Declaration of Independence. As the very opposite, the atheists of Karl Marx couldn’t have been happier than when they read Charles Darwin’s theory, positing a scientific alternative to the Book of Genesis.


One of the first readers of 'On the Origin of Species' was Friedrich Engels, then living in Manchester. He wrote to Karl Marx: "Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect."
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "Marx-Engels Collected Works" , vol. 40, p. 441.


Meaning, ‘no need for God or religion to explain life on earth.’ A series of mutations supplants God as the explanation.
Marx needs Darwin!!!




9. Now, here we see the most definitive of the limits nature puts on man’s endeavors: Darwin posited a series of alterations that result in new species. Impossible.

In Darwin's time, paleontologist Louis Agassiz knew the fossil record better than any man alive.
"He recognized that the problem with Darwinism was not the survival of the fittest, but rather the arrival of the fittest. Agassiz knew, as did most all animal and plant breeders both then and today, that clear limits exist to variation and no known way exists to go beyond these limits in spite of 4,000 years of trying. ....
... all mutations known to us cannot even begin to produce the variety required for molecules to mankind evolution, but rather they create 'monstrosities, and the occurrence of these, under disturbing influences, are…only additional evidence of the fixity of species. '"
Louis Agassiz: Anti-Darwinist Harvard Paleontology Professor



There is a limit, a natural limit, to mutations, and ultimately they are lethal!

...leaving Marx and Marxists without the scientific support they need for their doctrines.
 

Forum List

Back
Top