R
rdean
Guest
Bought off, that's a shock.
What other explanation could there be? Other than "no affair"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bought off, that's a shock.
Like the MessiahRushie or the HeavenlyNewt.
You usually are wrong, Steph whether intentionally or not.
I'm surprised Republicans haven't played this card before. Oh, wait, they did, only it was a "dude". Come on people. Make up your mind. Is it "Oscar Meyer" or is it "Oysters"?
They better watch their backs. I'm sure Homeland Security is already conducting surveillance on National Enquirer employees. You ever hear of the 'Disappeared?' These Enquirer employees better be careful. That being said,i wouldn't be too quick to dismiss the National Enquirer. The Liberal dominated MSM will ignore this story just like they do whenever a Democrat is involved in a scandal. That doesn't mean it's not true though. We saw this with the John Edwards scandal. The MSM tried their best to ignore that scandal and even defended Edwards afterward. This scandal could be the real-deal. I just worry about Enquirer employee safety at this point. This White House is capable of anything.
Heil!
Hail!!
You usually are wrong, Steph whether intentionally or not.
you got a mighty high horse to get off and on my dear. wonder how you do it day in and day out. doesn't it wear you out at times?
You usually are wrong, Steph whether intentionally or not.
you got a mighty high horse to get off and on my dear. wonder how you do it day in and day out. doesn't it wear you out at times?
The diff is I don't lie as a matter of tactics, you do.
You usually are wrong, Steph whether intentionally or not.
you got a mighty high horse to get off and on my dear. wonder how you do it day in and day out. doesn't it wear you out at times?
The diff is I don't lie as a matter of tactics, you do.
you got a mighty high horse to get off and on my dear. wonder how you do it day in and day out. doesn't it wear you out at times?
The diff is I don't lie as a matter of tactics, you do.
You mean you don't realize the stuff you post is untrue?
So some one thinks the National Enquirer is a reliable source of information?
The diff is I don't lie as a matter of tactics, you do.
You mean you don't realize the stuff you post is untrue?
What you and I post may be untrue but that does not mean that we know it; it only means we have not been good with our sources. Stephanie on the other hand lies as easily as she takes a dump. Forgive me for this level of crudity, but that is an apt metaphor for Steph's truthfulness as a human being.
You mean you don't realize the stuff you post is untrue?
What you and I post may be untrue but that does not mean that we know it; it only means we have not been good with our sources. Stephanie on the other hand lies as easily as she takes a dump. Forgive me for this level of crudity, but that is an apt metaphor for Steph's truthfulness as a human being.
no wonder you are so full of shit there jakey, you seem to know a lot about dumps. Remember little one, just because you ACCUSE me of lying doesn't PROVE IT SO. how is that search for a life coming?