Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Funny, only one of us has a DD214, and it isn't you.
How is that any different than what you guys did putting the current bunch of knuckledraggers on.Replace current SC judges with Dem / Socialist DIE hires is the goal intention of Dem / Socialist court packing.
People need to prove they are eligible to vote. I know that you and other Democrats would like nothing more than to remove this requirement. You don’t see the dangers of allowing non-citizens to vote or for people to vote on other’s behalf, etc. All that matters to Democrats is power and getting elected. The last thing the Democrats really want is a an election where each man and women that wanted to vote cam in with an ID, was verified and voted in person. That would be disastrous for their party, but ironically, the best thing for the country and our sovereignty.
Again, still more than you did.Lee Harvey Oswald had one of those, too. So does this guy,
John Anthony Walker - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You can wipe your ass with yours, it doesn't represent the service of an American in your case.
Again, still more than you did.
How is that any different than what you guys did putting the current bunch of knuckledraggers on.
Except there's no evidence that happens. What often happens in these cases is what you had happen in Florida in 2000, where thousands of eligible voters were purged from the roles because they had similar names to someone who was inelligible.
Everyone should have the right to vote whether they have an ID or not.
It was obvious you would want to sidestep the court packing issue. What the Dems / Socialists want is a court packed with DIE knuckleheads who are unqualified but will be obedient comrades to the Dem / Socialist politburo.
Except there's no evidence that happens. What often happens in these cases is what you had happen in Florida in 2000, where thousands of eligible voters were purged from the roles because they had similar names to someone who was inelligible.
It was obvious you would want to sidestep the court packing issue. What the Dems / Socialists want is a court packed with DIE knuckleheads who are unqualified but will be obedient comrades to the Dem / Socialist politburo. The only qualifications required for Comatose Joe are " let me sniff your hair", and "I'll buy you ice cream little girl because daddy owes you''.
Yes, there is evidence it happens, but proving it in mass is difficult, which is why the left doesn’t want voter id. The fact is, voter id makes things much secur, that cannot be denied. Whether or not you believe people are taking advantage of not having to provide an ID is irrelevant. We should be proactive and stop as much potential cheating as possible.
The most recent appointee to the Supreme Court is pretty solid proof of this, isn't it?
A mentally-retarded bimbo that doesn't know what a woman is, and has a history of siding with criminals, and especially sex offenders and child abusers.
No proof any of that is happening in any significant amount.Including illegal aliens, those who want to vote multiple times, those who want to vote under someone else's name, etc., right?
Failing to protect the electoral system from fraud is a violation of the voting rights of those who are eligible to vote, disenfranchising us by diluting our legitimate votes with votes that ought not have been allowed.
And again, it is blatantly obvious why you are so staunchly opposed to any reasonable measures to prevent election fraud from happening. You •WANT• election fraud to happen. You're on the side that openly expects and hopes to benefit from it.
Wow, I can hear the desperation... You guys set up the situation where SCOTUS can ignore sensible precedents as long as you have a majority, so court stacking is fine.
Except, no. Every vote has to be reconciled with a voter roll. So either these illegals are REALLY GOOD at guessing who isn't going to show up, or it isn't happening.
The problem is, of course is that when you guys do this, you usually end up disenfranchising people who have every right to vote, as Jeb did in 2000.
Yes, your obsession with the transgender is kind of amusing...
But compared to Barrett and Thomas, she's a genius. Two other people who were appointed because of their gender and race, respectively.
Except you're cutting and pasting slogans about "poor people" somehow being denied voting access. That's such nonsense. It may come as a surprise to you that "poor people" and POC's can get an ID. I understand your concern that as the overseer of those "poor people", it's your duty to be their hero and savior. Do you need tights and a cape?Except that's not what you are worried about. What you are worried about is poor people who have every right to vote doing so in numbers and voting for change.
Except you're cutting and pasting slogans about "poor people" somehow being denied voting access. That's such nonsense. It may come as a surprise to you that "poor people" and POC's can get an ID. I understand your concern that as the overseer of those "poor people", it's your duty to be their hero and savior. Do you need tights and a cape?
Actually, your belief that "poor people" and POC's are too helpless and/or ignorant to figure out how to get an ID is really pathetic.Actually, getting an ID is a bigger pain in the ass than you think. We've been trying to get my wife's updated for two months.
Actually, your belief that "poor people" and POC's are too helpless and/or ignorant to figure out how to get an ID is really pathetic.
Not at all.
My wife is hardly poor, although she is a person of color. Well, we made an appointment to update her name and address on her DL, only to find they want a bill or invoice under her name at the new address. So we had to change that, and THEN wait another month before they have another appointment open.
Wow, I can hear the desperation... You guys set up the situation where SCOTUS can ignore sensible precedents as long as you have a majority, so court stacking is fine.
No proof any of that is happening in any significant amount.
My wife is hardly poor, although she is a person of color. Well, we made an appointment to update her name and address on her DL, only to find they want a bill or invoice under her name at the new address. So we had to change that, and THEN wait another month before they have another appointment open.
Yes, your obsession with the transgender is kind of amusing...
But compared to Barrett and Thomas, she's a genius. Two other people who were appointed because of their gender and race, respectively.
Don’t worry. Your party is lettingg [sic] them flood in and they will later push for amnesty followed by allowing anyone legally in the country having the right to vote. You know it. We all know it. You just aren’t intelligent enough to see how dangerous that is to our country.
Except that's exactly what your side wants to do, isn't it?It is no the job of the SCOTUS to interpret laws based on what YOU think are ”sensible”. Their job is to interpret the laws based on our Constitution. Democrats don’t much like this because they expect the SCOTUS to be activists and interpret laws based on what the Democratic Party tells them to do . The Democrats on the bench do exactly that.
Don’t worry. Your party is lettingg them flood in and they will later push for amnesty followed by allowing anyone legally in the country having the right to vote. You know it. We all know it. You just aren’t intelligent enough to see how dangerous that is to our country.
No, guy, I realize you are a bit dim due to generations of inbreeding and moonshine, but here's the thing.And you believe that because she is Asian she had to provide this information? You are completely obsessed with race. It consumes you.
