Armed security would have stopped transgender school shooter….

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,237
2,290
The left wing, democrat party, transgender child murderer had a journal and the democrats in Nashville have been hiding it. The leak of 3 pages reveals the reason, as the hate for white people is clearly written on the pages.

The biggest point? If the school had armed security, or armed teachers…..the attack would not have happened.

How do we know……as with many of these attackers, the democrat party, left wing, transgender child murderer tells us……..

On another page, we find out what Hale’s biggest fear that day was . .

Upon arrival, and before getting guns out of the vehicle, the shooter planned to check the parking lot for any armed security personnel.

As we now know, no security personnel were found, and the shooter was able to take time entering the school without any armed opposition. The killing didn’t stop until police officers entered the school and did their actual jobs (something the Uvalde Police Department in Texas could learn a thing or three from).

The bottom line is this: the one thing this shooter feared was armed security. She had no fear of the law. There was no fear what anyone in the Republican Party was going to say about transgender people afterwards. There was no fear of what anyone in the Democrat Party was going to say about guns afterwards. There was no revulsion at the idea of murdering innocent children, and thus no moral restraints.

.

 
The left wing, democrat party, transgender child murderer had a journal and the democrats in Nashville have been hiding it. The leak of 3 pages reveals the reason, as the hate for white people is clearly written on the pages.

The biggest point? If the school had armed security, or armed teachers…..the attack would not have happened.

How do we know……as with many of these attackers, the democrat party, left wing, transgender child murderer tells us……..

On another page, we find out what Hale’s biggest fear that day was . .

Upon arrival, and before getting guns out of the vehicle, the shooter planned to check the parking lot for any armed security personnel.

As we now know, no security personnel were found, and the shooter was able to take time entering the school without any armed opposition. The killing didn’t stop until police officers entered the school and did their actual jobs (something the Uvalde Police Department in Texas could learn a thing or three from).

The bottom line is this: the one thing this shooter feared was armed security. She had no fear of the law. There was no fear what anyone in the Republican Party was going to say about transgender people afterwards. There was no fear of what anyone in the Democrat Party was going to say about guns afterwards. There was no revulsion at the idea of murdering innocent children, and thus no moral restraints.

.

Yo mean instead of flashing large neon signs saying "Gun Free Zone"??
 
Another advantage is the students will be less likely to attack the teachers ... this is a growing problem across the USA and these "stand your ground" laws would be helpful for the teachers keep control in the classroom ... I know it's not the child's fault the parents hate him, and the state prohibits abortion ... we're kinda stuck giving teachers that life-and-death decision ...

The next question is will the teacher pull that trigger? ... or like so many police officers, turn tail and run ...
 

And? This is why you allow some staff to carry guns with training, and more important, you allow parents to carry their legal guns with them when they visit the school during the day, dropping off forgotten lunches and homework, and picking up kids for dental and medical appointments.

The fact that at any time there may be people with guns on campus, who the shooter will not be able to readily identify, is the primary deterrent after just locking the school doors.
 
And? This is why you allow some staff to carry guns with training, and more important, you allow parents to carry their legal guns with them when they visit the school during the day, dropping off forgotten lunches and homework, and picking up kids for dental and medical appointments.

The fact that at any time there may be people with guns on campus, who the shooter will not be able to readily identify, is the primary deterrent after just locking the school doors.

No one knows a shooter is armed until people are already dead. I've stated many times I care less if a teacher wants to arm themselves. As far as I'm concerned they can but it's not going to solve the problem unlike what you seem to think.
 
No one knows a shooter is armed until people are already dead. I've stated many times I care less if a teacher wants to arm themselves. As far as I'm concerned they can but it's not going to solve the problem unlike what you seem to think.


Yeah, it is going to solve the problem if the school posts signs saying that some of the staff are armed and will defend the school if attacked....

We know this stops mass shooters because, like the democrat party, left wing, transgender child murderer in Nashville, they leave notes, or tell the police when they are captured. They are looking to commit murder, not engage in a gun fight.

Just a sample from other mass public shooters....

3/27/23

Police said the suspect’s writings revealed she planned to hit another location but was deterred by “too much security.”

Transgender Shooter Kills Six At Nashville Christian School




5/15/22.....

New York Mass Public Shooter Explicitly targeted: “areas where CCW are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack” “areas with strict gun laws are also great places of attack,” Another Socialist/Environmentalist

-----
The El Paso environmentalist/socialist/racist shooter also discussed doing an attack in a place where others wouldn’t be able to stop the attack:


One moment, please...


10/26/19

Mass Shootings in Gun-Free Zones - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

According to ABC News, El Paso law enforcement officials advise that, moments before his killing rampage, the shooter cased the Walmart “looking for Mexicans.” While that may be so, it is nevertheless true that, consistent with his “manifesto,” his recon was also calculated to make sure that he would be attacking in a low-security area. In that regard, the Walmart store had no armed security guard, no police presence, and was located in a shopping mall that was a self-proclaimed “gun-free zone.”
Similarly, in the Dayton, Ohio, mass shooting on Sunday, which immediately followed the El Paso murders, the victims were attacked as they exited a nightspot that was a gun-free zone.
And, in the Garlic Festival shootings in Gilroy, California last week, the victims were trapped inside a fenced area after going through metal detectors to make sure that they were disarmed. The shooter avoided the metal detectors by cutting through the fence and then attacking a victim pool that the Gilroy authorities had rendered incapable of defending themselves.
So it is that these most recent massacres share the one common element of almost all mass casualty shootings: gun-free zones.In addition to the El Paso shooter’s “manifesto,” there is abundant anecdotal evidence that mass casualty shooters prefer gun-free zones. For example, in 2016, Dearborn Heights, Michigan, ISIS supporter Khalil Abu Rayyan had an online discussion with an undercover FBI agent in which he discussed his plan for a “martyrdom operation” by attacking a Detroit church. He told the agent that this would be an easy target because “people are not allowed to carry guns in church.” Fortunately, Abu Rayyan was arrested before he could achieve martyrdom.
Similarly, in 2015, Elliot Rodger murdered six people in a Santa Barbara, California, gun-free zone. In his 141-page “manifesto,” he explained that in planning his attack he had decided against launching it in other locations where someone with a gun might be present to cut short his killing spree.
In the 2012 Aurora, Colorado, theater massacre, the killer’s diary showed that he had decided against attacking an airport because of its “substantial security.” And, out of the seven movie theaters within 20 minutes of the shooter’s home, he chose the only one that had posted signs declaring it to be a gun-free zone.
Given this record, anyone concerned with eliminating — or at least substantially reducing — mass public shootings must ask whether or not gun-free zones pose a danger to the public by attracting killers who prefer an unarmed victim pool and should give serious consideration to the following propositions:



3/3-/18

Orlando, Pulse Night club shooter wanted to attack Disney land

Pulse shooter's initial target was Disney site, prosecutors say


Prosecutors say the Orlando nightclub shooter intended to attack Disney World’s shopping and entertainment complex by hiding a gun in a stroller but became spooked by police and chose the gay club as his target.
3/5/18
https://www.nationalreview.com/blog/corner/profile-of-a-school-shooter/

The second thing: The shooter reveals that he thought seriously about whether his target would be a “gun free zone.” I mention this not to endorse any particular policy, but to make it clear that it is by no means rare for those who would do harm to first scope out their destinations and to make sure that they won’t encounter much resistance. The shooter openly explains that he chose the local elementary school, rather than the school he was really angry with (his own), because it lacked an armed guard. He also admits to having researched how long it took cops to respond in the area (15 minutes), and how long it would be before SWAT was on site (45 minutes). This echoes comments made by the shooter at Isla Vista, who considered carrying out his attack on Halloween, but decided against it because there’d be “too many cops walking around during an event like Halloween, and cops are the only ones who can hinder my plans.”

The actual story linked above...


“I HAVE TO BEAT ** ** . .” he wrote nine days before the Sept. 28, 2016, shooting in a misspelled reference to the Sandy Hook killer,** **. “Atleast 40.”

Two days later, he debated whether he should attack his middle school, from which he’d been expelled, or his elementary school, just up the road.

He decided on Townville Elementary because it was closer and had no armed security.



“Itll be like shooting fish in a barrel,” he wrote his friends, whose identities remain unclear, along with whether the FBI has tracked any of them down. The agency declined to comment, citing Jesse’s open case.

In the chat, he said he had researched police response times for the area and found that it would take them 15 minutes to get there, maybe 45 for SWAT. He said he would throw pipe bombs into each classroom before he got in a shootout with police and killed himself with his shotgun. He said he had been planning a massacre for two years.

=========


The Colorado theater shooter evidence...

Did Colorado shooter single out Cinemark theater because it banned guns?

Yet, neither explanation is right. Instead, out of all the movie theaters within 20 minutes of his apartment showing the new Batman movie that night, it was the only one where guns were banned. In Colorado, individuals with permits can carry concealed handgun in most malls, stores, movie theaters, and restaurants. But private businesses can determine whether permit holders can carry guns on their private property.
Most movie theaters allow permit holders carrying guns. But the Cinemark movie theater was the only one with a sign posted at the theater’s entrance.
A simple web search and some telephone calls reveal how easily one can find out how Cinemark compared to other movie theaters. According to mapquest.com and movies.com, there were seven movie theaters showing "The Dark Knight Rises" on July 20th within 20 minutes of the killer’s apartment at 1690 Paris St, Aurora, Colorado. At 4 miles and an 8-minute car ride, the Cinemark’s Century Theater wasn't the closest. Another theater was only 1.2 miles (3 minutes) away.
There was also a theater just slightly further away, 10 minutes. It is the "home of Colorado's largest auditorium," according to their movie hotline greeting message. The potentially huge audience ought to have been attractive to someone trying to kill as many people as possible. Four other theaters were 18 minutes, two at 19 minutes, and 20 minutes away. But all of those theaters allowed permitted concealed handguns.
So why would a mass shooter pick a place that bans guns? The answer should be obvious, though it apparently is not clear to the media – disarming law-abiding citizens leaves them as sitting ducks


FBI: Dearborn Heights ISIS supporter planned to attack Detroit church

In conversation's between Abu-Rayyan and the undercover agent, Abu-Rayyan described his desire to commit a martyrdom operation.

The complaint filed in federal court doesn’t specify which Detroit church he was allegedly planning to attack, only that it was close and could seat 6,000 members.

The complaint quotes Abu-Rayyan saying:

“It's easy, and a lot of people go there. Plus people are not allowed to carry guns in church. Plus it would make the news. Everybody would've heard. Honestly I regret not doing it. If I can't do jihad in the Middle East, I would do my jihad over here."

He had also told the undercover agent that a church would be an easy target because people are not allowed to carry guns there and that it would make the news.

----------------
Minnesota…...

Minnesota teen made bombs, stockpiled guns in prep for school massacre: police

The unhinged teen told cops, after being busted Tuesday, that he planned to shoot his sister, mom and dad with a .22-caliber rifle before he went to a rural field and set a fire to distract cops.
The 11th-grader then said he planned to go to Waseca Junior and Senior High School where he would toss Molotov cocktails and explode pressure-cooker bombs to try and kill “as many students as he could” in the cafeteria during lunchtime.
About 1,000 students, in 7th through 12th grade, attend the school.
LaDue, according to the notebook of his plan, would kill the school resource officer before continuing to kill other students. He was prepared to be gunned down by a SWAT Team, police said.


************************


Vince Vaughn is right about guns (and was brave to be so honest) | Fox News

Last June, Elliot Rodger, who killed six people in Santa Barbara, Calif., explained his own choice. In his 141-page “Manifesto,” Rodger turned down alternate targets because he worried that someone with a gun would cut short his killing spree.

That same month, Justin Bourque shot to death three people in Canada. His Facebook page made fun of gun bans, with pictures of defenseless victims explaining to killers that they weren’t allowed to have guns.

The diary of the Aurora, Colorado, “Batman” movie theater killer, James Holmes, was finally released this past week. It was clear that he was considering both attacking an airport and a movie theater, but he turned down the airport option because he was concerned about their “substantial security.”

Of course, there are numerous other examples such as the Columbine killersopposing the concealed carry law that was then working its way through the state legislature. The bill would have allowed people to carry permitted concealed handguns on school property. The killers timed their attack for the very day that final passage of the law was planned for in the legislature.

If you go to the link for the Colorado theater shooter they have a photo of his journal where he has notes about airports…..he lists one of the items…."Substantial Security"

http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/james-holmes-notebook-dragged.pdf
**************

Sandy hook, did not have police resource officer

Building a safer Sandy Hook | News21: Gun Wars

The high school and middle school, which already had armed resource officers, doubled down on security and restricted all visitors that didn’t have prior permission to enter.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/lupica-lanza-plotted-massacre-years-article-1.1291408?print


*****************

MILLER: Adam Lanza shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown final report

The shooter only stopped when the police arrived. He had plenty of ammunition and was prepared to continue changing magazines and reloading.
 
Yeah, it is going to solve the problem if the school posts signs saying that some of the staff are armed and will defend the school if attacked....

That may even encourage some as they have no desire to end the day alive.
 
That may even encourage some as they have no desire to end the day alive.

Yeah....except for the fact that we have multiple shooters who stated they avoided armed targets because even if they planned on dying by cop, they didn't want anyone stopping their attack when it started.
 

Armed security would have stopped transgender school shooter​


So would a mental evaluation requirement for the purchase of a gun.
Funny how I haven't seen the anti-gun loons offer that...
 

Armed security would have stopped transgender school shooter​


So would a mental evaluation requirement for the purchase of a gun.
Funny how I haven't seen the anti-gun loons offer that...

Or just a waiting period ... think Homer Simpson stamping his foot in the gun store ... "Two weeks? ... but I'm angry right now !!!" ...
 
Another advantage is the students will be less likely to attack the teachers ... this is a growing problem across the USA and these "stand your ground" laws would be helpful for the teachers keep control in the classroom ... I know it's not the child's fault the parents hate him, and the state prohibits abortion ... we're kinda stuck giving teachers that life-and-death decision ...

The next question is will the teacher pull that trigger? ... or like so many police officers, turn tail and run ...

Not so many police officers......one group in Uvalde vs. the two guys who went into the building and shot the left wing, democrat party, transgender child murderer.....they arrived and immediately entered the building and attacked the killer.
 
No one knows a shooter is armed until people are already dead. I've stated many times I care less if a teacher wants to arm themselves. As far as I'm concerned they can but it's not going to solve the problem unlike what you seem to think.
When opposing force is 10 feet away instead of 15 minutes away the number of deaths are far less
 
When opposing force is 10 feet away instead of 15 minutes away the number of deaths are far less

And odds are there are no deaths because the killer chooses a different target, a gun free zone instead of the site protected by an unknown number of armed people....
 
Or just a waiting period ... think Homer Simpson stamping his foot in the gun store ... "Two weeks? ... but I'm angry right now !!!" ...


How would a waiting period have stopped this attack? Are you serious, or did you just throw that out there as a reflexive response?

Mass shooters plan their attacks months to years in advance, a waiting period does nothing to stop them.

In particular, from the 3 pages from the left wing, democrat party, transgender child murderer, she counts down the hours until her attack is going to start.....having planned it for a long time.

Also, criminals do not undergo waiting periods, they get straw buyers to buy their guns or they steal their guns.....

Waiting periods are just a really stupid, feel good, irritant to normal people trying to buy a gun.
 

Forum List

Back
Top