Newby
Does it get any better?
- Jan 6, 2009
- 9,094
- 1,749
- 190
Unless you're suggesting that our natural population growth should be curtailed somehow, I can't see why it wouldn't expand.Is that as it exists now in the present day, or can that change based on the expansion of the 'muslim world'?
Depending on the situation, yes. Do I think that somebody should hunt down and behead Geert Wilders? Not really, but it would be good riddance if he happened to keel over and die tomorrow. The diplomatic approach should never be ruled out completely, even with you're dealing with the filthiest liars and bandits.
If so, the the 'muslim world' would perfectly understand whenever violence is used to resist the further expansion of the defined 'muslim world' into the 'non-muslim' world as it exists now then as well? Would you say that France and other countries in Europe have been invaded by the 'muslim world' and have every right to resist such an invasion?
I'll tell you what -- how about you get back to me about "invasions" when Muslim airplanes are releasing their payloads over Paris and wiping out villages in the border regions of Spain. Your attempt to draw parallels between sporadic unrest in immigrant communities and full-scale military occupations is about the silliest thing I've heard all morning. Sorry; having your car windows broken by teenagers isn't quite the same as seeing bombs dropped on your neighborhood and having your entire life turned upside down by imperialistic thugs who just can't be content with minding their own business.
While I agree with the "invasions" paragraph, to say that the muslim world should naturally expand, I would ask: expand to where? Do you mean simple population growth in your own countries, or taking back some countries that used to be muslim? Or even countries that never were muslim?
Which is exactly my point and what I was getting at. If they don't want the 'muslim world' to be 'invaded' by non-muslims then why would they expect anything different in the reverse? Especially when they don't seem to want to adopt the culture and the laws of the countries they are expanding too, but rather expect that country to change their laws to accomodate them. Why is the 'muslim world' sacred, yet the western world is not? That's a rhetorical question of course, I already know the answer to that one. And I understand what he means when he says 'muslim world' as well.
And maybe if the 'muslim world' didn't give the 'imperialistic thugs' valid reasons for not minding their own business, then you wouldn't have to worry about 'invasions'?