JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 15,253
- 16,147
- 2,405
- Thread starter
- #21
No, your question to me seemed to be aimed at all environmental laws, not just climate change related legislation. The problem with enacting climate change laws is the obstructionism of the right. No doubt that higher café standards helped as well as regs that the Obama Administration enacted and that Trump is trying to undo.Are you serious? Look at pictures of US cities in the 60s and 70s and as they are now. Are you telling me the clean air act did not work? Remember the burning rivers and acid rain? We haven't had a Love Canal recently have we? There is a very long list of very successful environmental laws.Well that is the purpose of the debate. To get to a solution that will work.Action and adaptation? Show me where the multi billions, some estimate over a trillion, has resulted in any meaningful action or adaption.I applaud the need to change the debate to action and adaption. The science is settled. There are people still debating whether the earth is round. Time to move on or we will get nowhere.
You guys have been doing that for decades now. Asking for a tally of results is completely reasonable.
Why are you hesitating to brag about all that you greenies have done?
Your dishonest dodge is noted. The topic is global warming.
You dodged because you know that there has been no results from all your efforts.