Mr. President - We The People

Obama's problem in this election is that he is not running against an unpopular incumbent. He's running on his own record... and he's got nothing.

Obama still enjoys a huge lead in projected electoral votes and leads in most swing states

The problem with your Messiah is that he is unpopular with his own base, unpopular personally and has no clear message for his path forward

Expect Obama to win with 325 or more electoral votes

Sad but true, in my opinion. With 47 percent not paying federal income tax and those same 47 percent now going to be on the free Obamacare train who among them are going to vote to take any chance of losing their freebies? I don't think I would. So it appears that by putting more and more people into federal government dependency an almost unsurmountable advantage has been created. No matter which side of the aisle one sits that can't seem like good news.

Two reasons 47 percent don't pay Federal Income tax

1. Bush tax cuts raised the bar on when you start paying taxes
2. Unemployment and low paying jobs put more people under that bar
 
Well let's address Iraq was a war of choice comment

I said



And you said what?

I dealt with your non-sequitur.

WWII was not a war of choice. Vietnam was..

But it doesn't change the underlying point.

Our military is a huge redistribution of wealth.

Are you disagreeing with that?

redistribution of wealth is taking from those who have earned it and giving it to those who have not.

Restribution of wealth is taking wealth from one area and putting it into another.

But lets work with your definition.

What wealth does the military generate, on it's own?
 
We, the People;

President Obama 3.7

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama 7.1 Governor Romney -0.3

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

President Obama 221 Governor Romney 181

RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map

And the President has a solid lead in the battleground states

It's June 2012, not October 2008. Just a little reminder for ya.



Yes it is now that Americans have experienced hope and fundamentally change America obama is toast.


"The bill sent for President Barack Obama's signature enables just over $100 billion to be spent on highway, mass transit and other transportation programs over the next two years...."

:woohoo: . :woohoo: . :woohoo: . :woohoo: . :woohoo: . :woohoo: . :woohoo:


:party: . :party:


:thewave:

*

Biden.jpg


"You're WHUPPIN' 'EM, Bubba!!!!!"
 
The guy trying to get his job definitely gives even less of a damn.

obama doesn't even take care of his family members. I wonder if his aunt is still living in the getto?

You know, you may have a point. He SHOULD do more to help extended family members. Too bad he was too busy crafting - and single-handedly saving - legislation that will help a lot of people while subsequently eating Republicans' lunch...AGAIN.


:badgrin:

That's a pathetic excuse for a millionaire who leaves his aunt living off of welfare. Just like a typical greedy hypocrite liberal....
 
obama doesn't even take care of his family members. I wonder if his aunt is still living in the getto?

You know, you may have a point. He SHOULD do more to help extended family members. Too bad he was too busy crafting - and single-handedly saving - legislation that will help a lot of people while subsequently eating Republicans' lunch...AGAIN.


:badgrin:

That's a pathetic excuse for a millionaire who leaves his aunt living off of welfare. Just like a typical greedy hypocrite liberal....

Ah yes, how sour those grapes are, eh?
 

Did you actually watch that video? It contradicts itself on many occasions. For example it talks about "re-distribution of wealth" and shows images of soldiers during the invasion of Iraq.

Iraq was not a defensive war..but a war of choice. And one that cost a great deal of money. That money came from tax payers..and was paid to private corporations dealing in arms and equipment.

Why is there no mention of that sort of re-distribution of wealth?

Allow ME!!!!!!


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETqX3DRtZtU]60 Minutes: George W. Bush Sought to -Find A Way- to Invade Iraq - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fHGCZC6EQs]Iraq War Profiteers: Part 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awbC_bXwEWg]Iraq War Profiteers - Part 2 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]​
 
I dealt with your non-sequitur.

WWII was not a war of choice. Vietnam was..

But it doesn't change the underlying point.

Our military is a huge redistribution of wealth.

Are you disagreeing with that?

redistribution of wealth is taking from those who have earned it and giving it to those who have not.

Restribution of wealth is taking wealth from one area and putting it into another.

But lets work with your definition.

What wealth does the military generate, on it's own?

obama is the great Re-distributor of wealth but his own.
 
We the People of the United States elected President Barack Obama by a two to one margin and intend to do it again

just keep thinking like obama and you'll going to have hurt feelings come November and finally realize America doesn't love you as much as you love yourself and think others should.

Evidently they do

He has a huge lead on Romney

We the People have Spoken

No, you the parasite class have spoken. We the people have unilaterally rejected Marxism, which is why Obama has lost every single election and poll he's been involved with since taking office. The first six special election campaign's he got involved with, the Democrat candidate lost, including to conservative Scott Brown in uber liberal Massachusetts. And let's not forget Scott Walker winning über liberal Wisconsin twice.... I won't even mention the earth shattering ass-kicking the parasite class took in the November 2010 elections :lol:
 
redistribution of wealth is taking from those who have earned it and giving it to those who have not.

Restribution of wealth is taking wealth from one area and putting it into another.

But lets work with your definition.

What wealth does the military generate, on it's own?

obama is the great Re-distributor of wealth but his own.

And that's your answer?

Lets go to the big board.

Survey says!

Not up there.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88_CrTsqg7Y&feature=related]Family Feud (1978)--A most difficult first question and how much is 1+1? - YouTube[/ame]
 
redistribution of wealth is taking from those who have earned it and giving it to those who have not.

Restribution of wealth is taking wealth from one area and putting it into another.

But lets work with your definition.

What wealth does the military generate, on it's own?

obama is the great Re-distributor of wealth but his own.

The greatest redistribution of wealth in our history came about because of Reagans policies
 
Obama 69,456,897

McCain 59,934,814

How exactly do you get two to one out of that result?

Obama 365

McCain 173

If Bush was declared the winner because of the EC vote despite losing the popular vote, then Obama can be considered to have won by a 2-1 margin on the same basis.

Obama's problem in this election is that he is not running against an unpopular incumbent. He's running on his own record... and he's got nothing.
 
Sorry an ad with platitudes, canards and sloganeering doesn't do it for me.

All needs said is 8 percent unemployment, crushing debt on our children, the division that HE has fostered in this country.....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc]Mitch McConnell: Top Priority, Make Obama a One Term President - YouTube[/ame]

*

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpOUctySD68]No You Can't (Featuring John Boehner) - YouTube[/ame]​
 
Obama 69,456,897

McCain 59,934,814

How exactly do you get two to one out of that result?

Obama 365

McCain 173

If Bush was declared the winner because of the EC vote despite losing the popular vote, then Obama can be considered to have won by a 2-1 margin on the same basis.

Obama's problem in this election is that he is not running against an unpopular incumbent. He's running on his own record... and he's got nothing.


"NOTHING"??

bd_laughatem.gif
 

Did you actually watch that video? It contradicts itself on many occasions. For example it talks about "re-distribution of wealth" and shows images of soldiers during the invasion of Iraq.

Iraq was not a defensive war..but a war of choice. And one that cost a great deal of money. That money came from tax payers..and was paid to private corporations dealing in arms and equipment.

Why is there no mention of that sort of re-distribution of wealth?

For example it talks about "re-distribution of wealth"

That's horse shit and you know it is.

"Virtually every economics Ph.D. who has worked in a prominent role in the Bush Administration acknowledges that the tax cuts enacted during the past six years have not paid for themselves--and were never intended to."




:eusa_whistle:
 
Restribution of wealth is taking wealth from one area and putting it into another.

But lets work with your definition.

What wealth does the military generate, on it's own?

obama is the great Re-distributor of wealth but his own.

And that's your answer?

Lets go to the big board.

Survey says!

Not up there.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88_CrTsqg7Y&feature=related]Family Feud (1978)--A most difficult first question and how much is 1+1? - YouTube[/ame]

:badgrin: Your candor is failing.
 
obama is the great Re-distributor of wealth but his own.

The greatest redistribution of wealth in our history came about because of Reagans policies

What ever Reagan did worked what obama is doing is not working.

No it didn't. There were financial calamities during Reagan's 2 terms that required bailouts. Additionally he put up one of the biggest tax increases in American history and it was weighted to hit the less fortunate in this country.

And that wasn't even enough. George HW Bush had to raise taxes as well.
 
:badgrin: Your candor is failing.

Failing what?

Again..I've brought up points about your video and you fail to address them..opting instead to deflect from the points.

Which causes one to question how much credence you give to your own OP.

You should have no trouble defending the message.

But you seem to.

:confused:
 

Forum List

Back
Top