Most mass shooters got their guns legally.

It's almost criminal the way the left is willing to swallow skewed statistics without checking. The firearms used in the Columbine shootings were purchased legally but not by the shooters. The firearm used in the Sandy Hook school shooting was purchased legally but not by the shooter. The media invents skewed statistics while the democrat party fights to insure that maniacs can buy guns because they usually vote democrat.
 
Of course they often claim gun owners don't commit crimes. Check a recent list of thread titles here.


They do not. Criminals in possession of illegal guns commit almost all of our gun crime.

You lie, and are dishonest, using 12 people out of over 350 million Americans to smear legal gun owners and to push banning and confiscating guns....you are a vile asshole.

Meanwhile, you protect the democrat party, the party responsible for the 19,000 gun murders in primarily democrat party controlled cities.....where the democrat party attacks the police to the point they can't or won't do their job in arresting criminals.....and then, the democrat party releases the most violent gun offenders over and over again....the ones doing almost all of the shootings in this country........
 
Right wingers, and unstable gun enthusiasts often claim legal gun owners just don't commit crimes. Not sure why, but they are rarely corrected for such a huge lie. One thing almost all mass shooters have in common is how they legally got their AR15, which is the weapon of choice for most mass shooters. Mass shooters are known as Good Guys With A Gun, right up until they open fire. There is no doubt that shooters generally match a pattern, and enacting red flag laws and universal background checks would have denied many mass shooters the weapons used in their attacks. It's past time for reasonable gun control, and only a fool can't see that.
In two thirds of school shootings, the shooter obtained the weapon from home or a friend's home because some 52% of gun owners don't lock them in a secure cabinet.
 
In two thirds of school shootings, the shooter obtained the weapon from home or a friend's home because some 52% of gun owners don't lock them in a secure cabinet.

And locking up their guns would be meaningless because these shooters plan their attacks and are obviously willing to commit murder.......

I am all for people locking up their guns when they are not being used or carried for self defense, but I am not going to support mandating it with laws that will simply be used to attack normal gun owners.

Mass public shootings in 2022.....

12

Twelve individuals out of over 350 million Americans.....

School shootings?

School shootings...

2022.....1
2021....1
2020....0
2019....0
2018.....2
2017....0
2016...0
2015....1 (community college)
2014...1
2013.....0
2012....2
2011....0
2010...0
2006.....1

1999.......1

1998.....2

1992....1

1989....1


So mass public school shootings are the rarest of rare events in this country........our real problem is the democrat party attacking our police to the point they can't, or won't do their jobs, and the democrat party policy of releasing the most violent gun criminals over and over again. These criminals, released by democrat party judges and prosecutors with soft on crime laws passed by democrat party politicians, are the ones doing 99.9% of all shootings in our country, in primarily democrat party controlled cities.

Encourage people to lock up their guns, but if we want to stop gun crime, vote out every single democrat from office.
 
In two thirds of school shootings, the shooter obtained the weapon from home or a friend's home because some 52% of gun owners don't lock them in a secure cabinet.
Wrong , the Lions share of the High profile Mass Shooters ( Except the Moslem San Bernardino couple and Adam Lanza and a few others ) Legally purchased their Firearms .
 
Wrong , the Lions share of the High profile Mass Shooters ( Except the Moslem San Bernardino couple and Adam Lanza and a few others ) Legally purchased their Firearms .
Correct.
Some of these people were able to do so because the various governments failed to report their convictions, etc, to the NICS.
The rest were able to do so because we do not exclude people from exercising their rights until after they do something to warrant it, and due process is met..
 
Correct.
Some of these people were able to do so because the various governments failed to report their convictions, etc, to the NICS.
The rest were able to do so because we do not exclude people from exercising their rights until after they do something to warrant it, and due process is met..
Because their Shrinks & Psychologists have laws that keep their Info from gettin out and that they are on SSRIs and have had 51/50 holds in recent past
 

Forum List

Back
Top