Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so Obama is loony to you?Nope, you wont' be here in 2012, unless the GOP pulls together. I hope so, and purges the far reactionaries to the right who have been pulling the party down.
Shellacking?Loony statement.
If it looks like another Obama victory, you will will run. I will give you the last word.
thanks, i knew you would do that you fucking moronso Obama is loony to you?Nope, you wont' be here in 2012, unless the GOP pulls together. I hope so, and purges the far reactionaries to the right who have been pulling the party down.
Shellacking?
If it looks like another Obama victory, you will will run. I will give you the last word.
In your head.
thanks, i knew you would do that you fucking moronso Obama is loony to you?
In your head.
'
After 'shellacking,' Obama laments disconnect - Politics - Decision 2010 - msnbc.com
you really are the fucking moron i call you
notice how he ran away, AGAINthanks, i knew you would do that you fucking moronIn your head.
'
After 'shellacking,' Obama laments disconnect - Politics - Decision 2010 - msnbc.com
you really are the fucking moron i call you
Jake has some type of affectation where he cannot not hear anything bad about Obama even when uttered from his Ossiah's own lips. Maybe Criminal Minds will do a show about it?
thanks, i knew you would do that you fucking moronIn your head.
'
After 'shellacking,' Obama laments disconnect - Politics - Decision 2010 - msnbc.com
you really are the fucking moron i call you
Jake has some type of affectation where he cannot not hear anything bad about Obama even when uttered from his Ossiah's own lips. Maybe Criminal Minds will do a show about it?
still not owning up to your being WRONGmdn1200 has affection and lust for men, but that is beside the point.
I have said that Obama at times has not been as good as a leader as I would have liked. I have all said that some of the opposition to him here is because that he, simply, is bi-racial.
The attacks here merely reveal you far right wacks wannabee conservatives are not "a step above", not "a winning generation."
Either the GOP changes to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism, or it will go back to the days of the 1930s and 1960s.
You idiots are stuck in the past.
Time to grow up.
I guess Republicans did not learn the lesson from the mid-terms:
Deficit Hypocrisy
It was not long ago that Republicans succeeded in holding unemployment benefits hostage to a renewal of the high-end Bush-era income tax cuts and as a little bonus won deep estate tax cuts for Americas wealthiest heirs. Those cuts will add nearly $140 billion to the deficit in the near term, while doing far less to prod the economy than if the money had been spent more wisely.
That should have been evidence enough that the Republican Partys one real priority is tax cuts despite all the talk about deficit reduction and economic growth. But heres some more:
On Dec. 22, just before they left town for the holidays, House Republican leaders released new budget rules that they intend to adopt when they assume the majority in January and will set the stage for even more budget-busting tax cuts.
First, some background: Under pay-as-you-go rules adopted by Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, tax cuts or increases in entitlement spending must be offset by tax increases or entitlement cuts. Entitlements include big health programs like Medicare and Medicaid, for which spending is on autopilot, as well as some other programs for veterans and low-income Americans. (Discretionary spending, which includes defense, is approved separately by Congress annually.)
The new Republican rules will gut pay-as-you-go because they require offsets only for entitlement increases, not for tax cuts. In effect, the new rules will codify the Republican fantasy that tax cuts do not deepen the deficit.
It gets worse. The new rules mandate that entitlement-spending increases be offset by spending cuts only and actually bar the House from raising taxes to pay for such spending.
More at the link. Read the rest, then try to defend these new rules.
Nothing to refute there because you have nothing. Talk honest and straight, or be cut out.<snip>mdn1200 has affection and lust for men, but that is beside the point.
I have said that Obama at times has not been as good as a leader as I would have liked. I have all said that some of the opposition to him here is because that he, simply, is bi-racial.
The attacks here merely reveal you far right wacks wannabee conservatives are not "a step above", not "a winning generation."
Either the GOP changes to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism, or it will go back to the days of the 1930s and 1960s.
You idiots are stuck in the past.
Time to grow up.
daveman, link us to where you condemn both democrat and republican spending, please.
The proper tactic for the GOP to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism is NOT to move to the left, Jake.mdn1200 has affection and lust for men, but that is beside the point.
I have said that Obama at times has not been as good as a leader as I would have liked. I have all said that some of the opposition to him here is because that he, simply, is bi-racial.
The attacks here merely reveal you far right wacks wannabee conservatives are not "a step above", not "a winning generation."
Either the GOP changes to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism, or it will go back to the days of the 1930s and 1960s.
You idiots are stuck in the past.
Time to grow up.
daveman, link us to where you condemn both democrat and republican spending, please.
You've seen me condemn Democrat spending. And I condemned Bush's spending here: Nutral Underground - View Single Post - Missing Boy Scout Found Alive
How 'bout you, Jake?
Time to grow up, reactionaries. Every last one of you have shown a real deficit in understanding reality.
The proper tactic for the GOP to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism is NOT to move to the left, Jake.mdn1200 has affection and lust for men, but that is beside the point.
I have said that Obama at times has not been as good as a leader as I would have liked. I have all said that some of the opposition to him here is because that he, simply, is bi-racial.
The attacks here merely reveal you far right wacks wannabee conservatives are not "a step above", not "a winning generation."
Either the GOP changes to meet the challenge of the re-growth of liberalism, or it will go back to the days of the 1930s and 1960s.
You idiots are stuck in the past.
Time to grow up.
Time to grow up, reactionaries. Every last one of you have shown a real deficit in understanding reality.
...says the guy unable to acknowledge that Obama used the word "shellacking".
You want me to praise Obama for doing what I condemned Bush for? Is that one of your "moderate Republican" positions?daveman, link us to where you condemn both democrat and republican spending, please.
You've seen me condemn Democrat spending. And I condemned Bush's spending here: Nutral Underground - View Single Post - Missing Boy Scout Found Alive
How 'bout you, Jake?
You condemned Bush. Good. I notice that was almost four years ago. Have you changed since then into a GOP meat puppet since then? But give credit where credit is due four years later.
Sorry, kid. You don't get to move the goalposts. I produced. You never have. You suffer from a common leftist failing: "If I say it, it must be true!"Show us where you have condemned the Republican spending since then.
You don't have the horsepower to be giving orders, kid.Me demonstrating what I condemned? Naw, don't have to. You are the one with the creditability problem. Snap to it, son.
