More evidence of using the teabaggers, then throwing them away

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
71,519
51,307
3,605
*
I guess Republicans did not learn the lesson from the mid-terms:



Deficit Hypocrisy

It was not long ago that Republicans succeeded in holding unemployment benefits hostage to a renewal of the high-end Bush-era income tax cuts and — as a little bonus — won deep estate tax cuts for America’s wealthiest heirs. Those cuts will add nearly $140 billion to the deficit in the near term, while doing far less to prod the economy than if the money had been spent more wisely.

That should have been evidence enough that the Republican Party’s one real priority is tax cuts — despite all the talk about deficit reduction and economic growth. But here’s some more:

On Dec. 22, just before they left town for the holidays, House Republican leaders released new budget rules that they intend to adopt when they assume the majority in January and will set the stage for even more budget-busting tax cuts.

First, some background: Under pay-as-you-go rules adopted by Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, tax cuts or increases in entitlement spending must be offset by tax increases or entitlement cuts. Entitlements include big health programs like Medicare and Medicaid, for which spending is on autopilot, as well as some other programs for veterans and low-income Americans. (Discretionary spending, which includes defense, is approved separately by Congress annually.)

The new Republican rules will gut pay-as-you-go because they require offsets only for entitlement increases, not for tax cuts. In effect, the new rules will codify the Republican fantasy that tax cuts do not deepen the deficit.

It gets worse. The new rules mandate that entitlement-spending increases be offset by spending cuts only — and actually bar the House from raising taxes to pay for such spending.




More at the link. Read the rest, then try to defend these new rules.
 
Pay as you go is being resurrected? The horror. It only lasted a week before they tossed it on its ear. I thought it was dead.

Taxes above a certain level do not raise revenue, they cause revenue to sink. The only reason to have rates over 25% is you want to screw someone over you don't like.
 
You cannot have a discussion on economics with people who believe that the Federal government IS the US economy
 
Last edited:
Say what? Republicans didn't learn their lesson after Americans kicked out 60+ democrats in the worst mid term defeat since 1948? Give the GOP a chance to get sworn in. "Tea baggers" is a deliberate offensive term used by hate-mongers on the left. It's Tea Party.
 
So, no teabaggers are going to defend the deficit-increasing new rules?

I don't blame you, but at least show some intellectual honesty and condemn these actions.

Teabaggers = SUCKERS!!!

c128.gif
c128.gif
c128.gif
 
You cannot have a discussion on economics with people who believe that the Federal government IS the US economy
 
First, some background: Under pay-as-you-go rules adopted by Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, tax cuts or increases in entitlement spending must be offset by tax increases or entitlement cuts. Entitlements include big health programs like Medicare and Medicaid, for which spending is on autopilot, as well as some other programs for veterans and low-income Americans. (Discretionary spending, which includes defense, is approved separately by Congress annually.)

The new Republican rules will gut pay-as-you-go because they require offsets only for entitlement increases, not for tax cuts. In effect, the new rules will codify the Republican fantasy that tax cuts do not deepen the deficit.
That's more intellectually honest than passing the silly "paygo" rule, then ignoring it when it's democratics doling out the goodies, then claiming republicans are holding the sainted pooooooor hostage.
 
First, some background: Under pay-as-you-go rules adopted by Democratic majorities in the House and Senate in 2007, tax cuts or increases in entitlement spending must be offset by tax increases or entitlement cuts. Entitlements include big health programs like Medicare and Medicaid, for which spending is on autopilot, as well as some other programs for veterans and low-income Americans. (Discretionary spending, which includes defense, is approved separately by Congress annually.)

The new Republican rules will gut pay-as-you-go because they require offsets only for entitlement increases, not for tax cuts. In effect, the new rules will codify the Republican fantasy that tax cuts do not deepen the deficit.
That's more intellectually honest than passing the silly "paygo" rule, then ignoring it when it's democratics doling out the goodies, then claiming republicans are holding the sainted pooooooor hostage.
:eusa_shhh: He fell for that.
 
Pay as you go is being resurrected? The horror. It only lasted a week before they tossed it on its ear. I thought it was dead.

Taxes above a certain level do not raise revenue, they cause revenue to sink. The only reason to have rates over 25% is you want to screw someone over you don't like.

You are brighter than that or have you forgotten the 1990s?
 
So, no teabaggers are going to defend the deficit-increasing new rules?

I don't blame you, but at least show some intellectual honesty and condemn these actions.

Teabaggers = SUCKERS!!!

c128.gif
c128.gif
c128.gif

Have you ever condemned Democrats for increasing the deficit?

The correct answer is, of course, "No".
Did the Democrats run on that during the mid-terms? NO!

Did the Republicans run on that during the mid-terms? YES!

You lose!


Dumbass.
 
Remind me of how this all happens after the Republicans actually control the house.
You didn't read the OP. These are the new rules, from Boehner, for the 2011 House, newly filled with gullible teabaggers.
 
Pay as you go is being resurrected? The horror. It only lasted a week before they tossed it on its ear. I thought it was dead.

Taxes above a certain level do not raise revenue, they cause revenue to sink. The only reason to have rates over 25% is you want to screw someone over you don't like.

You are brighter than that or have you forgotten the 1990s?

Yes, Newt's Congress stopped the government from spending every last cent

Now if the government were to "Shut down" 75% of Americans would Thank God for the relief
 
Moron, our people came swaggering back in for the lame duck session and harry, nancy, and barack kicked their yellow little asses. Either we come up with a way for real governance in this coming term, Obama is going to be president for life by the time this is all over.
 
Pay as you go is being resurrected? The horror. It only lasted a week before they tossed it on its ear. I thought it was dead.

Taxes above a certain level do not raise revenue, they cause revenue to sink. The only reason to have rates over 25% is you want to screw someone over you don't like.

You are brighter than that or have you forgotten the 1990s?

Yes, Newt's Congress stopped the government from spending every last cent

Now if the government were to "Shut down" 75% of Americans would Thank God for the relief

You are dodging, little boy. Newt and gang got their asses handed to them for trying to shut down the government last time, and that is what will happen this time if we try it again.
 
Moron, our people came swaggering back in for the lame duck session and harry, nancy, and barack kicked their yellow little asses. Either we come up with a way for real governance in this coming term, Obama is going to be president for life by the time this is all over.

Dems still had an overwhelming majority in the Lame Duck, right?

Obama will not even get nominated in 2012
 
Moron, our people came swaggering back in for the lame duck session and harry, nancy, and barack kicked their yellow little asses. Either we come up with a way for real governance in this coming term, Obama is going to be president for life by the time this is all over.
"Your people" are the ones who got their asses handed to them --in both the primaries and the general-- and Princess Nan, Grubby Harry and Little Lord Obammyroy came back and crammed as much of their neo-Marxist crap up our asses, before they go to their nice cushy lobbying jobs.

But hey...Someone has to live your lie....May as well be you. :lol::lol::lol:
 
You are brighter than that or have you forgotten the 1990s?

Yes, Newt's Congress stopped the government from spending every last cent

Now if the government were to "Shut down" 75% of Americans would Thank God for the relief

You are dodging, little boy. Newt and gang got their asses handed to them for trying to shut down the government last time, and that is what will happen this time if we try it again.

Yeah? You think people are happy about Washington overspending $1.3 Trillion annually AND 10% unemployment AND record poverty?

Why the fuck do you think people gave Obama a record setting shellacking?
 

Forum List

Back
Top