Mississippi & Louisiana Join Refusal to Honor Same Sex "Marriage"

[EdwardBaiamonte]

: extend freedom and liberty to all citizens?

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Arkansas County Clerk Resigns So She Doesn't Have To Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses"
Arkansas County Clerk Resigns So She Doesn t Have To Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

Keep 'em coming...

Hope she finds a nice job at Walmart

A bit above her pay-grade, but, WTH.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Arkansas County Clerk Resigns So She Doesn't Have To Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses"
Arkansas County Clerk Resigns So She Doesn t Have To Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

Keep 'em coming...

Now that's freedom of choice in action. She can go work at Walmart and then bitch about having to sell condoms to gay guys.

 

[daws101]

: extend freedom and liberty to all citizens?

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

: extend freedom and liberty to all citizens?

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

 

[daws101]

: extend freedom and liberty to all citizens?

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.[/QUOTE]

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

[/QUOTE]dear why so afraid to stick to the subject of OP?? for 4th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?

 

[daws101]

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject of OP?? for 4th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?[/QUOTE]you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject of OP?? for 4th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.[/QUOTE]
dear, did you forget you're the idiot who said all scientists agree the CA drought is caused by global warming??

 

[daws101]

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject of OP?? for 4th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear, did you forget you're the idiot who said all scientists agree the CA drought is caused by global warming??[/QUOTE]dodge didn't say all just the ones who are correct and that's most of them.
you can go back to masturbating NOW.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject?? for 3rd time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us??

false there ed you are trying to change the subject.

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear why so afraid to stick to the subject of OP?? for 4th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?

you first need to answer how you came to the erroneous conclusion that there has been 10.000 years of freedom on this planet and WHY SAME SEX Marriage infringes on your right to be mentally ill.

dear, did you forget you're the idiot who said all scientists agree the CA drought is caused by global warming??

dodge didn't say all just the ones who are correct and that's most of them.
you can go back to masturbating NOW.[/QUOTE] for 5th time: Why does freedom and liberty now mean homosexual marriage. What does your fear teach us?? Ever see a conservative afriad of a debate?
What does that teach you?

 

[Syriusly]

Roe is settled. That abortions are more difficult to get is a good thing, imo. I think 12 weeks as a cut off and only for rape, incest, or the life health of the mother.

If it settled why is there still a considerable movement to overturn it?

It's in force, its not settled. To be settled an amendment would have to be passed to actually put it in the document, not as part of an overturnable decision. And even then it wouldn't be settled.

Citizens United is settled- even though there is a considerable movement to overturn it.

An amendment would not 'settle' the issue- it just means that fewer people would disagree- there will always be disagreement.

To this day- the issue of 'mixed race marriage' is not settled- there are still people who are against mixed race marriage.

The number of people who are against mixed raced marriage so much they would ban it via government action is tiny enough that we could call the matter "settled". Even if people don't like it, most of them don't want to do anything about it except sneer at it and maybe disown their kids if one of them ever enters into one.

For abortion, you have a sizable portion of our country that would LOVE to overturn Roe v. Wade (including ironically, Roe).

A guy walks up to the beautiful blonde and asks her- "Would you have sex with me for 1,000,000 dollars?"
She hesitates and thinks about it a moment and says- "well okay"
"Would you have sex with me for $20.00?"
The woman errupts with outrage- and screams "What do you take me for?"
The man answers- "We already established that, we are just haggling on the price now.

So your "settled" is just a matter of the arguable size of the minority opinion- which just coincidentally coincides with your opinion.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Roe is settled. That abortions are more difficult to get is a good thing, imo. I think 12 weeks as a cut off and only for rape, incest, or the life health of the mother.

If it settled why is there still a considerable movement to overturn it?

It's in force, its not settled. To be settled an amendment would have to be passed to actually put it in the document, not as part of an overturnable decision. And even then it wouldn't be settled.

Citizens United is settled- even though there is a considerable movement to overturn it.

An amendment would not 'settle' the issue- it just means that fewer people would disagree- there will always be disagreement.

To this day- the issue of 'mixed race marriage' is not settled- there are still people who are against mixed race marriage.

The number of people who are against mixed raced marriage so much they would ban it via government action is tiny enough that we could call the matter "settled". Even if people don't like it, most of them don't want to do anything about it except sneer at it and maybe disown their kids if one of them ever enters into one.

For abortion, you have a sizable portion of our country that would LOVE to overturn Roe v. Wade (including ironically, Roe).

A guy walks up to the beautiful blonde and asks her- "Would you have sex with me for 1,000,000 dollars?"
She hesitates and thinks about it a moment and says- "well okay"
"Would you have sex with me for $20.00?"
The woman errupts with outrage- and screams "What do you take me for?"
The man answers- "We already established that, we are just haggling on the price now.

So your "settled" is just a matter of the arguable size of the minority opinion- which just coincidentally coincides with your opinion.

abortion and gay marriage are best handled by the states so you can move rather than have the majority viewpoint shoved down your throat. American is supposed to be about freedom, not mob rule.

 

[Syriusly]

So, if we just had more married homos the poverty rate would drop?

The Heritage Foundation thinks so. You've heard of them, yes?

Reducing Poverty by Promoting Healthy Marriage

Key word is "healthy".

And you have evidence that our marriages aren't?

Common sense would tell you that two guys sticking their dicks into fecal matter, probably isn't healthy.
.

And how does that apply to the lesbian who asked you the question?

Or the gay men who don't have anal sex?
Or the straight couples that do?

 

[Syriusly]

Roe is settled. That abortions are more difficult to get is a good thing, imo. I think 12 weeks as a cut off and only for rape, incest, or the life health of the mother.

If it settled why is there still a considerable movement to overturn it?

It's in force, its not settled. To be settled an amendment would have to be passed to actually put it in the document, not as part of an overturnable decision. And even then it wouldn't be settled.

Citizens United is settled- even though there is a considerable movement to overturn it.

An amendment would not 'settle' the issue- it just means that fewer people would disagree- there will always be disagreement.

To this day- the issue of 'mixed race marriage' is not settled- there are still people who are against mixed race marriage.

The number of people who are against mixed raced marriage so much they would ban it via government action is tiny enough that we could call the matter "settled". Even if people don't like it, most of them don't want to do anything about it except sneer at it and maybe disown their kids if one of them ever enters into one.

For abortion, you have a sizable portion of our country that would LOVE to overturn Roe v. Wade (including ironically, Roe).

A guy walks up to the beautiful blonde and asks her- "Would you have sex with me for 1,000,000 dollars?"
She hesitates and thinks about it a moment and says- "well okay"
"Would you have sex with me for $20.00?"
The woman errupts with outrage- and screams "What do you take me for?"
The man answers- "We already established that, we are just haggling on the price now.

So your "settled" is just a matter of the arguable size of the minority opinion- which just coincidentally coincides with your opinion.

abortion and gay marriage are best handled by the states so you can move rather than have the majority viewpoint shoved down your throat. American is supposed to be about freedom, not mob rule.

How is either someone's abortion being shoved down your throat? Or someone's marriage?

 

[Syriusly]

: extend freedom and liberty to all citizens?

so after 10,000 years freedom and liberty means homosexual marriages?

hey ed human civilization is just about that old and except for the last 150 years there was no freedom .
you can go back to sleep now.

dear please explain why you think freedom and liberty now means homosexual marriage or admit you lack the IQ to be here

Marriage is now free and equal to all persons regarding of which gender that they want to marry.

Which gives them more freedom- and takes nothing away from yours.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

So, if we just had more married homos the poverty rate would drop?

The Heritage Foundation thinks so. You've heard of them, yes?

Reducing Poverty by Promoting Healthy Marriage

Key word is "healthy".

And you have evidence that our marriages aren't?

Common sense would tell you that two guys sticking their dicks into fecal matter, probably isn't healthy.

But........here's more.

Homosexual couples less healthy than married heterosexuals study finds News LifeSite

On The Unhealthy Homosexual Lifestyle

Facts About Youth Health Risks of the Homosexual Lifestyle

The Facts on the Gay Movement

Shigella Infections among Gay & Bisexual Men (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - April 9, 2015) - Shigella germs are present in the feces (poop) of people with shigellosis while they have diarrhea and up to a few weeks after the diarrhea has gone away. Shigella is very contagious; exposure to even a tiny amount of fecal matter with Shigella in it can cause infection. Symptoms usually start 1-2 days after exposure, but may range from 12-96 hours. Transmission of Shigella infection occurs in the following ways:
- Person-to-person contact. Shigella passes from stools or soiled fingers of one person to the mouth of another person, which can happen during sexual activity. Oral-anal sex, or oral stimulation (i.e., sucking or licking) of the anus (anilingus or "rimming"), may be especially risky.
- Eating food contaminated by someone who has shigellosis.
- Swallowing recreational or drinking water that was contaminated by infected fecal matter.

You're comparing single people to married people.

Where are the lesbians?

I'm comparing lifestyles.

The lesbians are eating at the Y.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Lonestar, myob, this has been decided.

You should take your own advice.

You should take anyones advice but your own.

When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Sunday stated that county clerks, judges and justices of peace can deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples for religious reasons, arguing that the Supreme Court did not abolish religious liberty.

No, he said they might be able to claim that issuing one violates their right to religious freedom, but that whether or not it did so depends.
He wrote, "Factual situations may arise in which the county clerk seeks to delegate the issuance of same-sex marriage licenses due to a religious objection, but every employee also has a religious objection to participating in same-sex-marriage licensure. In that scenario, were a clerk to issue traditional marriage licenses while refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses, it is conceivable that an applicant for a same-sex marriage license may claim a violation of the constitution. If instead, a county clerk chooses to issue no marriage licenses at all, it raises at least two questions. First, a clerk opting to issue no licenses at all may find himself or herself in tension with the requirement under state law that a clerk "shall" issue marriage licenses to conforming applications. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.§ 2.008(a) (West 2006). A court must balance this statutory duty against the clerk's constitutional rights as well as statutory rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. Second, a court must also weigh the constitutional right of the applicant to obtain a same-sex marriage license. Such a factually specific inquiry is beyond the scope of what this opinion can answer. In short, county clerks and their employees retain religious freedoms that may provide for certain accommodations of their religious objections to issuing same-sex marriage licenses--or issuing licenses at all, but the strength of any particular accommodation claim depends upon the facts." In other words, "it depends."

He also said he had a team of lawyers to help defend the clerks if they are threatened with legal action for refusing to abide by an unconstitutional law.

Texas as a whole did not concede. Which was my point

So the laws requiring clerks to marry interracial couples was unconstitutional? Weird....

Did it go against a persons religious belief? No.

Apples and oranges.

Stop comparing yourselves to black Americans, it makes you look desperate.

"Did it go against a persons religious belief?" Of course it did. Much of the justification for the ban on interracial marriage was based on a twisted interpretation of the bible.

"Theodore Bilbo was one of Mississippi’s great demagogues. After two non-consecutive terms as governor, Bilbo won a U.S. Senate seat campaigning against “farmer murderers, corrupters of Southern womanhood, [skunks] who steal Gideon Bibles from hotel rooms” and a host of other, equally colorful foes. In a year where just 47 Mississippi voters cast a ballot for a communist candidate, Bilbo railed against a looming communist takeover of the state — and offered himself up as the solution to this red onslaught.For Senator Bilbo, however, racism was more that just an ideology, it was a sincerely held religious belief. In a book entitled Take Your Choice: Separation or Mongrelization, Bilbo wrote that “[p]urity of race is a gift of God . . . . And God, in his infinite wisdom, has so ordained it that when man destroys his racial purity, it can never be redeemed.” Allowing “the blood of the races [to] mix,” according to Bilbo, was a direct attack on the “Divine plan of God.” There “is every reason to believe that miscegenation and amalgamation are sins of man in direct defiance to the will of God.”
When Religious Liberty Was Used To Justify Racism Instead Of Homophobia ThinkProgress

Senator Bilbo sound an awful lot like many commenting here.
There is still a church in Texas that claims that interracial marriage is contrary to the word of God.
http://www.applebybaptistchurch.com/Articles/B.P.& ****** Js..pdf

"First let me be clear; I would witness to a Negro as quickly as I would any other race. I am sorry for using a term they themselves use in this article. However, I am not going to avoid the Scriptures in order to have a Negro in our congregation as many of the brethren do. If a Black couple or family wants to come to our Church they need not expect me to avoid what God says about the Hamite. If an interracial couple (Hamite and Gentile, or Hamite and Jew, etc.) wants to come to our assembly they will need to know I will not be silent about their UN scriptural union just to keep them. It has nothing to do with being prejudiced; it is a matter of the Bible."

Such view were very prevalent in the South at the time Loving was decided. So, if a member of the Appleby Baptist Church is a clerk in Texas, you would support that clerks right to refuse a marriage license to an interracial couple.

Weak

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lonestar is simply pissed the lesbians have most of the money and all of the pussy.