Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He'd love to be Ayatollah.He'd love it in Iran.Mike Huckabee The Supreme Court can t overrule God - CNNPolitics.com
"I respect the courts, but the Supreme Court is only that -- the supreme of the courts. It is not the supreme being. It cannot overrule God," he said. "When it comes to prayer, when it comes to life, and when it comes to the sanctity of marriage, the court cannot change what God has created."
Well, for a while, till the GOP eventually vet him out as too crazy and divisive to win in swing states.And the religious loons will line up to vote for this guy. Amazing.
Mike Huckabee The Supreme Court can t overrule God - CNNPolitics.com
"I respect the courts, but the Supreme Court is only that -- the supreme of the courts. It is not the supreme being. It cannot overrule God," he said. "When it comes to prayer, when it comes to life, and when it comes to the sanctity of marriage, the court cannot change what God has created."
Huckabee wants a theocracy.
Then why didn't he do that as the Governor of Arkansas?
Our Courts would strike it down as unconstitutional so don't worry about anyone trying to run the country as a theocracy.
Huckabee wants a theocracy.
Then why didn't he do that as the Governor of Arkansas?
Our Courts would strike it down as unconstitutional so don't worry about anyone trying to run the country as a theocracy.
Pfffttt..... they live in a world far removed from reality.
Cuz he can't do it doesn't mean he didn't want to.Huckabee wants a theocracy.
Then why didn't he do that as the Governor of Arkansas?
Our Courts would strike it down as unconstitutional so don't worry about anyone trying to run the country as a theocracy.
ROFLMNAO!
Isn't it cool how forbidding deviant behavior, somehow represents a theocracy?
(The Reader should realize that such a perversion of reason, is a presentation of the mental disorder which also presents as sexual deviancy... . )
Does that explain your obvious interest in queer folk?The gay activities of gay folks can't concern me too terribly much. I lack the interest, and the taste for specially cultivated outrage.They'd have to give up their voodoo economics too. Although....I'm sure the talking heads could fool enough low info voters into thinking the GOP has a good record on the economy.
The above exchange is the intellectual equivalent of homosexual mutual materbation... OKA: a shameful waste of energy.
However, there is a great deal of interest in homosexuals among the self-described conservatives/Republicans/right-wing on this board.
I'm figuring it's some kind of secretly hopeful envy.
Explain your obvious interest in queer folk.
There's also a great deal of interest in the flu, cancers and heart disease. But I wouldn't say that such are any more of a concern than mental illness.
Yes, it does.
It is foolish to expect that viable policy from those whose very existence is unviable.
What is reasonable to expect from allowing the unviable to set public policy is an unviable public... thus an unviable culture. And I'm against that. So I speak out against it, a lot.
The trouble with that is...Not Christians, but Fundamentalist Christians. Just as the Taliban is made up of fundamentalist Muslims.I agree.The American Taliban. Worship as we do or our God's law will deliver justice. Stop thinking, start believing.Mike Huckabee The Supreme Court can t overrule God - CNNPolitics.com
"I respect the courts, but the Supreme Court is only that -- the supreme of the courts. It is not the supreme being. It cannot overrule God," he said. "When it comes to prayer, when it comes to life, and when it comes to the sanctity of marriage, the court cannot change what God has created."
What tripe.
Your characterization of Christians as Taliban is, indeed, tripe.
Don't kit yourself...Does that explain your obvious interest in queer folk?The gay activities of gay folks can't concern me too terribly much. I lack the interest, and the taste for specially cultivated outrage.The above exchange is the intellectual equivalent of homosexual mutual materbation... OKA: a shameful waste of energy.
However, there is a great deal of interest in homosexuals among the self-described conservatives/Republicans/right-wing on this board.
I'm figuring it's some kind of secretly hopeful envy.
Explain your obvious interest in queer folk.
There's also a great deal of interest in the flu, cancers and heart disease. But I wouldn't say that such are any more of a concern than mental illness.
Yes, it does.
It is foolish to expect that viable policy from those whose very existence is unviable.
What is reasonable to expect from allowing the unviable to set public policy is an unviable public... thus an unviable culture. And I'm against that. So I speak out against it, a lot.
Given the overwhelming support for gay rights in this country,
your views are the new deviancy.
No, Huckabee has the support of some who want a return to a more God-fearing and Christian -like social and cultural and legal framework in this country - such as we had for the first couple of centuries of our national existence...Huckabee has the support of those who think we should be more like Iran or Saudi Arabia.
Don't kit yourself...Does that explain your obvious interest in queer folk?The gay activities of gay folks can't concern me too terribly much. I lack the interest, and the taste for specially cultivated outrage.
However, there is a great deal of interest in homosexuals among the self-described conservatives/Republicans/right-wing on this board.
I'm figuring it's some kind of secretly hopeful envy.
Explain your obvious interest in queer folk.
There's also a great deal of interest in the flu, cancers and heart disease. But I wouldn't say that such are any more of a concern than mental illness.
Yes, it does.
It is foolish to expect that viable policy from those whose very existence is unviable.
What is reasonable to expect from allowing the unviable to set public policy is an unviable public... thus an unviable culture. And I'm against that. So I speak out against it, a lot.
Given the overwhelming support for gay rights in this country,
your views are the new deviancy.
Look at the large numbers of Marriage Defense Laws that surfaced across the country, many of them spawned as public referenda...
It required activist judges to overturn those State -level laws...
Given a different Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution as it pertains to Gay Marriage - thereby clearing the way for a revisiting of State -level Marriage Defense laws - via public referenda - it seems entirely likely that the voters in a great many States would, once again, as they have in the very recent past, serve-up referenda results in defense of Marriage in the traditional man-woman framework.
All the people of this country need, to head down that path again, is a sign from the judicial branch of their government, that their mandate will not be swept aside and ignored next time, and that so-called 'overwhelming support' ya'll love to cite, will evaporate faster than a drop of water spilled into a hot fry-pan...
Pffffffftttt...
No, Huckabee has the support of some who want a return to a more God-fearing and Christian -like social and cultural and legal framework in this country - such as we had for the first couple of centuries of our national existence...Huckabee has the support of those who think we should be more like Iran or Saudi Arabia.
Without all the politically correct horseshit, without abortion, without the welfare state, and with deviants and perverts (homosexuals) stuffed back into the closet.
My guess is, that's pretty much the extent of it.
All this likening to Iran, Saudi Arabia, et al, is merely hyperbole.
Don't kit yourself...Does that explain your obvious interest in queer folk?There's also a great deal of interest in the flu, cancers and heart disease. But I wouldn't say that such are any more of a concern than mental illness.
Yes, it does.
It is foolish to expect that viable policy from those whose very existence is unviable.
What is reasonable to expect from allowing the unviable to set public policy is an unviable public... thus an unviable culture. And I'm against that. So I speak out against it, a lot.
Given the overwhelming support for gay rights in this country,
your views are the new deviancy.
Look at the large numbers of Marriage Defense Laws that surfaced across the country, many of them spawned as public referenda...
It required activist judges to overturn those State -level laws...
Given a different Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution as it pertains to Gay Marriage - thereby clearing the way for a revisiting of State -level Marriage Defense laws - via public referenda - it seems entirely likely that the voters in a great many States would, once again, as they have in the very recent past, serve-up referenda results in defense of Marriage in the traditional man-woman framework.
All the people of this country need, to head down that path again, is a sign from the judicial branch of their government, that their mandate will not be swept aside and ignored next time, and that so-called 'overwhelming support' ya'll love to cite, will evaporate faster than a drop of water spilled into a hot fry-pan...
Pffffffftttt...
lol, how many states had anti-miscegenation laws when the Supreme Court struck them down?
Could someone provide a practical example of how this would manifest?
Is there a situation in which a Supreme Court ruling would be ignored because of something in the Bible?
Seems like a legitimate question and a legitimate concern.
.
Oh, but you characters DO love to pretend an equivalency between Racial Discrimination and Abhorrence of Sexual Perversity....lol, how many states had anti-miscegenation laws when the Supreme Court struck them down?
Nobody said anything about the 19th Century... merely a return to some of its values... the better ones, worth saving.No, Huckabee has the support of some who want a return to a more God-fearing and Christian -like social and cultural and legal framework in this country - such as we had for the first couple of centuries of our national existence...Huckabee has the support of those who think we should be more like Iran or Saudi Arabia.
Without all the politically correct horseshit, without abortion, without the welfare state, and with deviants and perverts (homosexuals) stuffed back into the closet.
My guess is, that's pretty much the extent of it.
All this likening to Iran, Saudi Arabia, et al, is merely hyperbole.
So Huckabee wants to build a bridge to the 19th century. Has he warned black Americans about this plan?
Nobody said anything about the 19th Century... merely a return to some of its values... the better ones, worth saving.No, Huckabee has the support of some who want a return to a more God-fearing and Christian -like social and cultural and legal framework in this country - such as we had for the first couple of centuries of our national existence...Huckabee has the support of those who think we should be more like Iran or Saudi Arabia.
Without all the politically correct horseshit, without abortion, without the welfare state, and with deviants and perverts (homosexuals) stuffed back into the closet.
My guess is, that's pretty much the extent of it.
All this likening to Iran, Saudi Arabia, et al, is merely hyperbole.
So Huckabee wants to build a bridge to the 19th century. Has he warned black Americans about this plan?
The less-worthy ones, like racial discrimination, can be safely left in the past.
Any pretense that so-called 'fundamentalists' are pursuing or advocating a return to the slave-era is just that - pretense - partisan pretense.
Oh, but you characters DO love to pretend an equivalency between Racial Discrimination and Abhorrence of Sexual Perversity....lol, how many states had anti-miscegenation laws when the Supreme Court struck them down?
Racial admixture is not an Evil, and is not banned by various religious dogma nor backed by thousands of years of active teaching that it is wrong.
Sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals) do not enjoy that same advantage.
Rightly so.
Oh, but you characters DO love to pretend an equivalency between Racial Discrimination and Abhorrence of Sexual Perversity....lol, how many states had anti-miscegenation laws when the Supreme Court struck them down?
Racial admixture is not an Evil, and is not banned by various religious dogma nor backed by thousands of years of active teaching that it is wrong.
Sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals) do not enjoy that same advantage.
Rightly so.
