Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL............well..........dang..............Id say Wilson was a pretty damn good shot with a handgun!!! Fuck that's impressive as shit!!!
By the way.............message to the OP........the grand jury decision happened last week!!! Nobody cares about drivel like this at this point!!
They think that Hollywood gun fights are real world reality. You know unlimited bullets and being able to hit a bullseye from a hundred yards away. With a pistol, while running.Statis, you do realize that the effective range of Officer Wilson's sidearm (Sig Sauer P239 in .40 cal) is far less than the 50 yards you believe Mike Brown to have been shot at, right? It would have been quite a feat to have hit him more than once or twice at that distance; especially if either one of them was moving. Therefore I see zero believability in your supposition.
Who's Williams? Did he kill a thug too?Or, it can also mean that Williams lied about his position when he fired the shots.
I see nothing that says that a 239 cannot shoot 50 yards. In fact, most pistols can. Easily.
In fact, it would be a shitty pistol, or in this case, semi-automatic handgun, if you cannot fire a decent shot for at least 100 meters.
Or, it can also mean that Williams lied about his position when he fired the shots.
The evidence was put in front of the Grand Jury.
Many witnesses were involved.
The Grand Jury found Wilson was innocent of wrong doing.
It's really simple to measure the distance, and quite accurately:
Those who measured started at the fire-hydrant that was near the police car from which officer Wilson fired the deadly shots:
Distance from the driver's side door (when officer Wilson claims he fired the shots) to the fire hydrant: 17 feet.
Distance from the fire hydrant to the spot where Michael Brown was standing when he was shot: 131 feet.
131 +17 = 148.
Now, there is an angle involved between the cop car and the hydrant, which means that actual distance of 17 feet, calculated as a straight line, will be somewhat less, maybe one third less. So, the true distance may be 140 to 141 feet. The angle represented by the yellow line looks to be about 35 degrees to the plain, if you consider the straight path of the sidewalk next to the hydrant to be the plain.
The police report says 35 feet. And a police officer said TWICE in a press conference that the distance was 35 feet:
(1:13 and 6:01)
35 feet and 148 are nowhere close to each other in terms of distance. 148 feet = 49 yards, or just about one-half of a football field.
The film clearly documents the start and end points, and they can be confirmed by police photos and photos shot by witnesses on that day.
35 feet could be an argument for immediate danger for a police officer. But 148 feet? No way.
Why did the Ferguson police lie about this detail?
And if the Ferguson police have lied about this, then we must ask what else they have lied about?
You know, sometimes it's all about simple math. The Ferguson police can lie for a while, but they cannot change geography and they cannot undo so many photos and videos.
Discuss.
Does a suspected perpetrator who is 148 feet away from an officer represent a danger to that officer's life?
LOL............well..........dang..............Id say Wilson was a pretty damn good shot with a handgun!!! Fuck that's impressive as shit!!!
By the way.............message to the OP........the grand jury decision happened last week!!! Nobody cares about drivel like this at this point!!
The truth is always important. Or are Righties not interested in the truth?
Spambot still wanting someone to pay attention to it.
It could try participating in the conversation rather than reposting the same spam.
The Grand Jury got all of the details and couldn't produce an indictment. The more of the evidence I see the more I can see that we've been lied to by the media from day one.No, it is fishy.
As is the fact that Wilson's captain said Wilson didn't know about the robbery and then Wilson testified that he did.
Yes, more and more details are going to come out that will not line up with the facts, because the FPD lied at the onset. Really, physical distance from point A to point B is not hard to measure. It's one of the first things that criminal labs do in the case of shootings, to determine trajectory and a number of other factors. The only plausible reason the FPD would have had to lie and say only 17 feet (which would be only twice the distance from that police car to the fire-hydrant marked in the photo) would be to claim immediate danger to the life of officer Wilson. Also, at 148 feet, there is no way that an officer can claim that a perpetrator (and Michael Brown WAS a perpetrator, make no mistake about it, he was no angel) turned around to rush an officer.
Okay, let's do the same thing with a black grand jury and a prosecutor who doesn't misstate the law.
There were black witnesses who supported Wilson's account.The evidence was put in front of the Grand Jury.
Many witnesses were involved.
The Grand Jury found Wilson was innocent of wrong doing.
Okay, let's do the same thing with a black grand jury and a prosecutor who doesn't misstate the law.
He was a criminal. Not that I believe your distances at all but he could have been 148 MILES away and he would still have deserved to die.
Brown
No he wasn't.Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death
Simple math proves you wrong. And it is documented. You can even see the flowers still being put on the sidewalk directly across from the spot where Michael Brown was shot down in cold blood, 148 feet away from an officer who was in no way in danger.
