Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death

[zeke]

We already know that lefties are NEVER interested in the truth.

No the fucking truth asshole is that no kid should be shot down in the street for stealing cigs and punching a cop.

 

[PredFan]

LOL.....Joe B always disappears for awhile after I make him look like a dick.


fucking fag

Stop patting yourself on the back, Joe is a fool, and easily shown to be one. Any 5th grader could do it.

 

[PredFan]

We already know that lefties are NEVER interested in the truth.

No the fucking truth asshole is that no kid should be shot down in the street for stealing cigs and punching a cop.

Yeah the witnesses, the expert testimony, and the forensic science says you are stupid.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

He was a criminal. Not that I believe your distances at all but he could have been 148 MILES away and he would still have deserved to die.

When did get to face his accuser in court? When was his swift and speedy trial?

What capital crime had he been accused of? When was he tried by a jury of his peers, found guilty and then sentenced to death?

 

[PredFan]

3 bullet casings found close to browns body

evidence the distance between the two which was much MUCH less then 148 feet

Or that Wilson picked up his brass and moved it.

 

[PredFan]

Left wingers are so stupid and so dishonest that ones only recourse us to make fun if them and irritate them as much as possible.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

He was 148 feet away and Wilson managed to get two head shots on the boy with a police issue Glock? Wow, that's amazing. Oh wait...

You've been fooled by a photo/meme, and a bad one at that. Officer Wilson was carrying a .40 caliber Sig-Sauer P239 handgun at the time of the shooting. I've also seen several photos and other images depicting a Glock, but from what I've read that is not the firearm he was carrying.

Why were there no fingerprints found on his gun?

Because it was not dusted for fingerprints.

Why didn't Wilson's photos show any damage beyond a couple of small reddish areas?

Why was Wilson allowed to clean away evidence?

 

[Roadrunner]

Michael Brown was 148 feet from Wilson as he was shot to death

No he wasn't.

Who fuckin' cares.

He fucked up, he died.

 

[Roadrunner]

No, it is fishy.

As is the fact that Wilson's captain said Wilson didn't know about the robbery and then Wilson testified that he did.

Yes, more and more details are going to come out that will not line up with the facts, because the FPD lied at the onset. Really, physical distance from point A to point B is not hard to measure. It's one of the first things that criminal labs do in the case of shootings, to determine trajectory and a number of other factors. The only plausible reason the FPD would have had to lie and say only 17 feet (which would be only twice the distance from that police car to the fire-hydrant marked in the photo) would be to claim immediate danger to the life of officer Wilson. Also, at 148 feet, there is no way that an officer can claim that a perpetrator (and Michael Brown WAS a perpetrator, make no mistake about it, he was no angel) turned around to rush an officer.

The trial is over moron. You won't find anything that the PROFESSIONALS didn't.

There was no trial, because there was no crime on the officer's part, and the criminal died.

 

[Roadrunner]

It doesn't matter if he was 20 miles away. Why are you doing this? Do you think that you can find out some evidence that the Grand Jury didn't? They hear the actual testimony from the experts and the witnesses, you did not and will not. YOU will accept anything gleaned off the internet unvetted in any way, as long as it promotes your narrative.

I disregard the grand jury proceeding because it was tainted by race, by McCollough's biases, and by police incompetence and misconduct.

I bet you think anyone that has had a family member killed by a black should be excluded from police work, law school, or elective office, don't you?

 

[Roadrunner]

The dolts on the left watch too much crime TV!!


Mental cases........shit should never even gone to the grand jury.

"The community" demanded a grand jury since they were not allowed to lynch Darren Wilson.

 

[Anathema]

they don't show if he had his hands up when the bullet went through his skull. there's no way to tell that, forensically.

Nor does it matter. He was a criminal, therefore he was undeserving of the right to continue wasting oxygen by living.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The evidence was put in front of the Grand Jury.
Many witnesses were involved.

The Grand Jury found Wilson was innocent of wrong doing.

No they did not.

 

[Roadrunner]

The forensic evidence supported Darren Wilson's version of the events. You disagree, forensics says your wrong. Why do you lefties hate science anyway? Is it because facts are unfeeling? Facts can't be coerced into changing due to skin color? Facts tell the truth?

the Forensics only proved he wasn't shot in the back.

they don't show if he had his hands up when the bullet went through his skull. there's no way to tell that, forensically.

But for weeks you insisted he was shot in the back.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Darren Wilson's gun was NOT tested for Michael Brown's fingerprints, and officer was able to wash blood from his hands: Probe's serious errors exposed in grand jury files

• A jury ruled Darren Wilson will not stand trial over Michael Brown shooting
• Jury files reveal examples of crime scene protocol not being followed
• Officer Wilson was allowed to drive himself away from the crime scene
• He then put his weapon in an evidence bag himself after washing his hands
• Wilson claimed that Brown had tried to wrestle his gun from him
• But the gun was never tested for fingerprints, an investigator revealed

Read more: Darren Wilson s gun was NOT tested for Michael Brown s fingerprints and officer was able to wash blood from his hands Probe s serious errors exposed in grand jury files Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[Roadrunner]

We already know that lefties are NEVER interested in the truth.

No the fucking truth asshole is that no kid should be shot down in the street for stealing cigs and punching a cop.

No kid should weigh 300 lbs.

 

[DriftingSand]

Panorama photo: cop car is on the left, Mike Brown's body is on the right.

The two sides of the apartment complex line up perfectly. There is no way in the world that that is even close to 35 feet. It is indeed well over 100 feet. 145-148 is more likely. The only way to get points A and B into the picture is with a panoramic photo. That alone tells you something about the distance.

Wilson already testified that he "gave chase" as he was trained to do. You don't really believe that Wilson shot his pistol while in his car -- do you?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

From the reams of grand jury testimony and police evidence, here are some key points that, if this case had gone to trial, could have been highlighted by prosecutors (not including the witnesses who appeared to contradict Wilson’s testimony):

1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilson’s testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. “I think it was his blood,” Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.



A photo of Wilson's injuries taken at the hospital after his altercation with Brown, released by the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

2. The first officer to interview Wilson failed to take any notes.

The first supervising officer to the scene, who was also the first person to interview Wilson about the incident, didn’t take any notes about their conversation. In testimony more than a month after the incident, the officer offered his account from memory. He explained that he hadn’t been equipped with a recorder and hadn’t tried to take any written notes due to the chaotic nature of the situation. He also didn’t write up any notes soon after the fact. “I didn’t take notes because at that point in time I had multiple things going through my head besides what Darren was telling me,” the officer stated.

The same officer admitted during his grand jury testimony that Wilson had called him personally after they both had been interviewed by investigators. Wilson then went over his account again with the officer. The officer told the grand jury that there were no discrepancies between Wilson’s first account in person and his second account on the phone. But the call raises questions about whether Wilson may have influenced witness testimony.

3. Investigators failed to measure the likely distance between Brown and Wilson.

An unnamed medical legal examiner who responded to the shooting testified before the grand jury that he or she had not taken any distance measurements at the scene, because they appeared “self-explanatory.”

“Somebody shot somebody. There was no question as to any distances or anything of that nature at the time I was there,” the examiner told the jury.

The examiner also noted that he or she hadn’t been able to take pictures at the scene -- as is standard -- because the camera's batteries were dead. The examiner later testified that he or she accompanied investigators from the St. Louis County Police Department as they photographed Brown’s body.



A photo of the Aug. 9 crime scene in Ferguson, released by the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

4. Investigators did not test Wilson’s gun for fingerprints.

Talking with police investigators and before the grand jury, Wilson claimed that Brown had grabbed at Wilson's gun during the initial incident in the police car and that Brown's hand was on the firearm when it misfired at least once. Wilson also told police that he thought Brown would overpower him and shoot him with his own gun. “I was not in control of the gun,” Wilson said. Eventually he regained control of the weapon and fired from within the car.

Investigators could have helped to prove or disprove Wilson’s testimony by testing his service weapon for Brown’s fingerprints. But the gun was not tested for fingerprints. An investigator argued before the grand jury that the decision was made not to test the weapon because Wilson “never lost control of his gun.”

5. Wilson did not immediately turn his weapon over to investigators after killing Brown.

A detective with the St. Louis County Police Department, who conducted the first official interview of Wilson, testified to the grand jury that Wilson had packaged his own service weapon into an evidence envelope following his arrival at the police station in the wake of the shooting. The detective said the practice was not usual for his department, though he was unclear on the protocol of the Ferguson Police Department. He said he didn’t explore that aspect further at the time.

According to the detective’s testimony, standard practice for the St. Louis County Police Department would be for an officer involved in a shooting to keep his or her weapon holstered until it can be turned over to a supervisor and a crime scene unit detective. While that clearly didn’t take place in Wilson’s case, the detective also testified that he believed the firearm was handled in a way that preserved the chain of custody.



A photo of Wilson's service weapon, released by the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

6. An initial interview with investigators was delayed while Wilson traveled to the hospital with his superiors.

The same St. Louis County Police Department detective also testified that while he had intended to conduct his initial interview with Wilson at the Ferguson police station, a lieutenant colonel with the Ferguson Police Department decided that Wilson first needed to go to the hospital for medical treatment. The detective said that while it is common practice to defer to any medical decision of this nature, Wilson appeared to be in good health and didn’t have any notable injuries that would have prevented an interview from being conducted at the station. Wilson would also testify that he didn’t believe he needed to go to the hospital.

But that day, Wilson got into a vehicle with the lieutenant colonel and another Ferguson police official and went to the hospital, while the St. Louis County detective traveled in another vehicle.

7. Wilson’s initial interview with the detective conflicts with information given in later testimony.

In his first interview with the detective, just hours after Brown’s death, Wilson didn’t claim to have any knowledge that Brown was suspected of stealing cigarillos from a nearby convenience store. The only mention of cigarillos he made to the detective was a recollection of the call about the theft that had come across his radio and that provided a description of the suspect.

Wilson also told the detective that Brown had passed something off to his friend before punching Wilson in the face. At the time, the detective said, Wilson didn’t know what the item was, referring to it only as “something.” In subsequent interviews and testimony, however, Wilson claimed that he knew Brown’s hands were full of cigarillos and that fact eventually led him to believe Brown may have been a suspect in the theft.

 

[Pop23]

3 bullet casings found close to browns body

evidence the distance between the two which was much MUCH less then 148 feet

Or that Wilson picked up his brass and moved it.

With 40 onlookers, at noon on a residential street and none of the witnesses reported seeing this movement.

Delusional much?

 

[Meathead]

When did get to face his accuser in court? When was his swift and speedy trial?

What capital crime had he been accused of? When was he tried by a jury of his peers, found guilty and then sentenced to death?

Wilson was never accused of a crime nor certainly found guilt and sentenced to death.Weird questions.