Looks Like Pelosi Wanted the January 6 Riot to Occur, Refused All Requests to Use NG Troops to Guard Capitol

[Faun]

You really are a moron... who appointed the House SAA? NANCY... ITs called CHAIN OF COMMAND. You people are so damn stupid.

LOL

Imbecile, no one appoints the Sergeant at Arms. It's an elected position.

Like I always say, there's no dumber creature slithering the Earth than a conservative.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

FED

FED

FED!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well, well, isn't this interesting: It turns out that at least four days before January 6, TRUMP authorized the use of 20,000 National Guard (NG) troops to protect the Capitol but that Nancy Pelosi refused every request to use the troops even when the capitol police leadership requested the troops.

John Solomon broke this blockbuster story this morning on Just the News. Tonight on Hannity he will discuss another newly obtained document that shows that Sen. Schumer's staff received FBI intel that some of the protestors would storm the Capitol but failed to act on it.

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.

justthenews.com

She had no problem having NG troops guard the Capitol for weeks after the riot, even though there was no credible threat of trouble, but her supposed excuse for refusing requests to use NG troops was that it would be "bad optics." "Bad optics"? Ensuring the safety of the Capitol would be "bad optics"? Why wasn't it "bad optics" to keep NG troops around the Capitol for weeks after the riot when there was clearly no need for them?

 

[Faun]

They are appointed you dumb ass. The committee can only suggest.

You really are having a really hard time with this...

Cretin...

The Sergeant-at-Arms

The Sergeant–at–Arms is elected at the beginning of a Congress by the resolution electing all officers of the House (other than the Speaker). Upon election, the Sergeant–at–Arms is administered the oath of office by the Speaker. The Sergeant–at–Arms is subject to removal by the House or by the Speaker, pursuant to clause 1 of rule II. If the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms becomes vacant during a Congress (due to the resignation, removal, death, or incapacity of the Sergeant–at–Arms), the House will typically fill the vacancy by adopting a new resolution electing an individual to that position. However, the Speaker has the statutory authority to appoint a temporary replacement until the House is ready to elect a new Sergeant–at–Arms. The oath of office is administered to a new Sergeant–at–Arms upon election or appointment.​

Do you have any idea at all how retarded you look when you call someone else a 'dumbass' when in fact, YOU'RE the dumbass who clearly doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about??