Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Comey was ordered to clean up Clinton and Obama's mess until he got fired for being a crook, a liar, and a subversive piece of shit. Rod Rosenstein tried to get Mueller appointed as head of The FBI to finish the job and Trump threw him and Mueller out of The White House. Rosenstein then appoints Mueller as DeFacto head of The FBI to investigate Trump for not hiring Mueller as the head of THE FBI.Mueller's there to hide the crimes of the previous administration. That's his forte, he's the cleaner.
Obama kicks out the Russian diplomats.
Russia calls Flynn.
Obama was spying on Flynn.
Flynn conspired with Russia!
This is all a bullshit set up. We all know it.
Mueller's purpose is to give a Democrat controlled House the document they needed to bring impeachment charges against Trump. That will be his statement.Victoria Toensing: Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes?
"The sorry saga began with a January 12, 2017 column about the Flynn/Kislyak conversations by The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, who described his source as a “senior U.S. government official,” i.e., an Obama administration functionary. Whoever told Ignatius the fact of and substance of the eavesdropped conversations committed a felony by leaking classified information.
The second crime is publicly revealing a U.S. citizen’s identity as being a party to those conversations. When there is authorized intelligence collection of foreign officials, the identity of the U.S. person who is incidentally picked up during that collection is to be minimized (not disclosed), even within the U.S. government. Instead of the party’s name, the document substitutes “[U.S. Person].” There is a process for “unmasking”—obtaining the name of the undisclosed person--when the government official determines knowing the name is important to national security. A written request must be made to the collecting agency that is responsible for the document. Only a handful of officials are given that authority, e.g. NSA has only 20. Perhaps there was a valid need for an Obama official to know Flynn’s identity. That issue is irrelevant. Providing it to Ignatius was a crime."
"Before Flynn flunked remembering every word of a conversation he was asked to recall weeks later, an Obama administration official had egregiously broken the national security and privacy laws. But only Flynn has been charged with a crime.
"Not only was the basis for questioning Flynn a ruse, but more significantly the FBI did not have to ask him about the conversations to determine if there was a crime because it had the transcripts and recordings of every single word. If Flynn had committed any illegal act in the conversations, the Justice Department could have indicted him that day. But it did not. Nor did Mueller ever mention such an illegality in his December 2017 charges against Flynn for false statements."
"Mueller should have pursued these crimes as he is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
So, this is what we have:
So this whole conspiracy is based off of the fact that Obama spied on a political opponent. With the help of the FBI he conducted political espionage against the current president in an attempt to win the 2020 election. The whole purpose of it is purely political. There is no legal basis to any of it. Hillary rigged the 2016 nomination and now Democrats are in the process of rigging the 2020 election.
- This investigation began because Obama wanted to spy on the Trump campaign
- They used a fake document paid for by Hillary and the DNC to start an FBI investigation
- They recommended that Trump fire the FBI director for incompetence
- They created a Special Council investigation because Trump fired his FBI director
- The Special Council's report will be the foundation for impeachment
- They feel that Trump will lose the 2020 election because he had been impeached and thus tainted
I really have to laugh at these threads. They are truly funny. Let us see, first you condemn Mueller for going beyond his mandate, then you say he is not going far enough. The you want Mueller to go after Obama, but to the best of my knowledge, Obama was never at any Trump Tower meetings, never worked for the criminal enterprise known as the Trump Organization and not a single Obama staff member has pleaded guilty to a crime.
Continue with your comical deflections. It makes for good entertainment.
The Great Obama had a scandal free administration
Trump didn’t last a week
Yet Obama has committed numerous crimes.....but for some strange reason no prosecutor will attempt to indict him.I really have to laugh at these threads. They are truly funny. Let us see, first you condemn Mueller for going beyond his mandate, then you say he is not going far enough. The you want Mueller to go after Obama, but to the best of my knowledge, Obama was never at any Trump Tower meetings, never worked for the criminal enterprise known as the Trump Organization and not a single Obama staff member has pleaded guilty to a crime.
Continue with your comical deflections. It makes for good entertainment.
Yet Obama has committed numerous crimes.....but for some strange reason no prosecutor will attempt to indict him.
If you have evidence that Obama committed crimes, you should contact the FBI.
Mueller is not Director of the FBI. He is a Special Counsel, appointed to investigate a very specific scope--namely Russian interference in the 2016 to include any possible collaboration by US persons, and related secondary criminal activity.
Because unlike tRump's crimes they only exist in the collective conservative imagination.Victoria Toensing: Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes?
"The sorry saga began with a January 12, 2017 column about the Flynn/Kislyak conversations by The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, who described his source as a “senior U.S. government official,” i.e., an Obama administration functionary. Whoever told Ignatius the fact of and substance of the eavesdropped conversations committed a felony by leaking classified information.
The second crime is publicly revealing a U.S. citizen’s identity as being a party to those conversations. When there is authorized intelligence collection of foreign officials, the identity of the U.S. person who is incidentally picked up during that collection is to be minimized (not disclosed), even within the U.S. government. Instead of the party’s name, the document substitutes “[U.S. Person].” There is a process for “unmasking”—obtaining the name of the undisclosed person--when the government official determines knowing the name is important to national security. A written request must be made to the collecting agency that is responsible for the document. Only a handful of officials are given that authority, e.g. NSA has only 20. Perhaps there was a valid need for an Obama official to know Flynn’s identity. That issue is irrelevant. Providing it to Ignatius was a crime."
"Before Flynn flunked remembering every word of a conversation he was asked to recall weeks later, an Obama administration official had egregiously broken the national security and privacy laws. But only Flynn has been charged with a crime.
"Not only was the basis for questioning Flynn a ruse, but more significantly the FBI did not have to ask him about the conversations to determine if there was a crime because it had the transcripts and recordings of every single word. If Flynn had committed any illegal act in the conversations, the Justice Department could have indicted him that day. But it did not. Nor did Mueller ever mention such an illegality in his December 2017 charges against Flynn for false statements."
"Mueller should have pursued these crimes as he is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
Did you mean thought?Mueller's purpose is to give a Democrat controlled House the document they needed to bring impeachment charges against Trump. That will be his statement.Victoria Toensing: Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes?
"The sorry saga began with a January 12, 2017 column about the Flynn/Kislyak conversations by The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, who described his source as a “senior U.S. government official,” i.e., an Obama administration functionary. Whoever told Ignatius the fact of and substance of the eavesdropped conversations committed a felony by leaking classified information.
The second crime is publicly revealing a U.S. citizen’s identity as being a party to those conversations. When there is authorized intelligence collection of foreign officials, the identity of the U.S. person who is incidentally picked up during that collection is to be minimized (not disclosed), even within the U.S. government. Instead of the party’s name, the document substitutes “[U.S. Person].” There is a process for “unmasking”—obtaining the name of the undisclosed person--when the government official determines knowing the name is important to national security. A written request must be made to the collecting agency that is responsible for the document. Only a handful of officials are given that authority, e.g. NSA has only 20. Perhaps there was a valid need for an Obama official to know Flynn’s identity. That issue is irrelevant. Providing it to Ignatius was a crime."
"Before Flynn flunked remembering every word of a conversation he was asked to recall weeks later, an Obama administration official had egregiously broken the national security and privacy laws. But only Flynn has been charged with a crime.
"Not only was the basis for questioning Flynn a ruse, but more significantly the FBI did not have to ask him about the conversations to determine if there was a crime because it had the transcripts and recordings of every single word. If Flynn had committed any illegal act in the conversations, the Justice Department could have indicted him that day. But it did not. Nor did Mueller ever mention such an illegality in his December 2017 charges against Flynn for false statements."
"Mueller should have pursued these crimes as he is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
So, this is what we have:
So this whole conspiracy is based off of the fact that Obama spied on a political opponent. With the help of the FBI he conducted political espionage against the current president in an attempt to win the 2020 election. The whole purpose of it is purely political. There is no legal basis to any of it. Hillary rigged the 2016 nomination and now Democrats are in the process of rigging the 2020 election.
- This investigation began because Obama wanted to spy on the Trump campaign
- They used a fake document paid for by Hillary and the DNC to start an FBI investigation
- They recommended that Trump fire the FBI director for incompetence
- They created a Special Council investigation because Trump fired his FBI director
- The Special Council's report will be the foundation for impeachment
- They feel that Trump will lose the 2020 election because he had been impeached and thus tainted
And people though Dick Nixon taping conversations in The White House was bad?
Reality.
Obama threw out the Russian diplomats knowing the Russians would contact Flynn, who was part of the Trump transition team.
It was a set up.
Donald Trump and Putin did not rig the 2016 and steal it from HIllary.
It did not happen.
It was a set up
Reality.
Obama threw out the Russian diplomats knowing the Russians would contact Flynn, who was part of the Trump transition team. It was a set up. Donald Trump and Putin did not rig the 2016 and steal it from Hillary. It did not happen.
We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.Trump is being overwhelmingly exposed as a criminal liar and probably impeachable offenses and his supporters here on USMB are still blabbering bu...bu...bu...Obama.....Hillary.
By pointing out the stupidity of people like YOU!As you prove daily.You can't fix 'stupid'.
The Great Obama had a scandal free administration
Trump didn’t last a week
No, O didnt. There was plenty of scandal with benghazi, solyndra, billions greasing his buds pockets for stimulus, illegal campaign funds violations.etc.
